That was because he was suspendedPlease, do you remember why Flanagan lost his NRL coaches licence? Refresher, because he spoke to players about recruitment for next year.
Go Dogs
That was because he was suspendedPlease, do you remember why Flanagan lost his NRL coaches licence? Refresher, because he spoke to players about recruitment for next year.
Go Dogs
No he wontThere's plenty of rules and clauses in the NRL that get bent or flat out ignored including the cap. You are pretty naive if you think these get adhered to in the competitive environment like the NRL.
Barrett will have his hands all over the Dogs roster shaping it for next year from the minute he signs on.
Unfortunately the mail (not from the media)is Hill is pushing the Barrett barrow pretty hard. I really hope Lynne & Dunn finally wake up & take control of the ship.
Ask 'The Drunk' over at News Corp. Phil knows more than we do. Or the club, it would seem. He's already named 3, including Bellamy! Probably peers into his weathered Scotch glass each evening like a soothsayer reading tea leavesHow many other coaches did our club actually interview before deciding on Barrett?..
And why do you think that’s the case?Unfortunately the mail (not from the media)is Hill is pushing the Barrett barrow pretty hard. I really hope Lynne & Dunn finally wake up & take control of the ship.
That might help join a couple more dots in the same way I was largely headed...Sounds like hill is aligning himself with the khoury / gould camp, for job longevity, maybe he knows something the Anderson's may not know in terms of board movement in the near future.
Pretty weak from Anderson and the footy club board to get strong armed by the Leagues Club chairman into Barrett.That might help join a couple more dots in the same way I was largely headed...
Agree. And precisely why I can’t believe that’s the case and why Hill would align himself that way - doesn’t add up to me - unless there’s something else none of us have seen yet.Pretty weak the Anderson and the footy club board to get strong armed by the Leagues Club chairman into Barrett.
Hill’s MO is divide & conquer.And why do you think that’s the case?
I can join the dots on some who want Barrett and why but why Hill? He doesn’t even have a vote at board level anyway, even though he attends the meetings.
Pretty weak from Anderson and the footy club board to get strong armed by the Leagues Club chairman into Barrett.