- Joined
- Mar 5, 2005
- Messages
- 40,982
- Reaction score
- 1,181
That's different and Manly could have prevented it several times a very long time ago. This is a different situation.So what about our coach breaking a contract to come over and coach us?
That's different and Manly could have prevented it several times a very long time ago. This is a different situation.So what about our coach breaking a contract to come over and coach us?
You make me laugh tbh...I have always agreed with you lol. Though this one we are way way way apart. Moltzen & Tedescoe can both stay the **** away from our jerseys or I will be filthy.
Folau, Hayne, Tomkins, Beale all awesome A+ effort for replacing Barba with superstar quality.
Locke is a settlement.
Tedescoe/Moltzen/Nuffies I will deadset rage.
I don't give a sh1t about the negative rubbish in the media they will always write about us... I care bout being competitive and winning... because once you do that, everybody forgets about all the other stuff.Neither way is honourable and neither better or worse. We would be hypocritical in this forum to condone a switch by Hayne but chuck rocks at Barba for not honouring his contract with us.
We all know how the scenario would play out in the media in a negative fashion. Rise above it.
Locke isn't a bad option to think about though...has a big heart. A good fit but still like Josh at the back.
The basics are the same. Hasler wanted more money and a new contract and they wouldn't give it. Sure he deserved it and I will never know how there board didn't get sacked but he was contracted for another year and left and came across to us. Sure I don't know all the little insider stuff but as I said the basics are the same and the manly fans would agree, they are still fuming over it.That's different and Manly could have prevented it several times a very long time ago. This is a different situation.
Basics may be the same but it's the process in which is causing anger. Hasler was a very easy fix on Manly's behalf while we're dealing with a lying disrespectful little cnt.The basics are the same. Hasler wanted more money and a new contract and they wouldn't give it. Sure he deserved it and I will never know how there board didn't get sacked but he was contracted for another year and left and came across to us. Sure I don't know all the little insider stuff but as I said the basics are the same and the manly fans would agree, they are still fuming over it.
Yep, that's what I'm saying.Neither way is honourable and neither better or worse. We would be hypocritical in this forum to condone a switch by Hayne but chuck rocks at Barba for not honouring his contract with us.
plus we sort of went by the book, we signed him for the end of his current deal initiallyThat's different and Manly could have prevented it several times a very long time ago. This is a different situation.
Yeah agree but remember that's from our side of the fence. Unfortunately knowing a couple of manly fans that's what they think of Hasler and him taking alot of the staff with him. Easy fix at manly, may appear so but remember Toovey hasn't done anything other than keep Hasler's plan in place. He has the same team etc so we will see how good toov's is after this current crop move on and he has to come up with stuff himself.Basics may be the same but it's the process in which is causing anger. Hasler was a very easy fix on Manly's behalf while we're dealing with a lying disrespectful little cnt.
I remember people questioning James graham, Sam burgess etcYou make me laugh tbh...
What have you seen from Tomkins to make you believe that he will strive in the NRL?
Agree, but not worth the $1M he is asking forI remember people questioning James graham, Sam burgess etc
I've seen Tomkins play a few games on TV & a few games live & he is a standout
Whether he will continue that form in NRL, I'd love to find out!
Yeah. I wouldn't pay that for anyone with Izzy a possible exceptionAgree, but not worth the $1M he is asking for
I think the only Players in the NRL that are worth the $1M are GI & JT & SmithYeah. I wouldn't pay that for anyone with Izzy a possible exception
Being such a heavy contact sport there are too many injures to risk signing a player with such a large chunk of your cap
The basics are far from the same. If you knew the truth about the situation you would laugh at the ineptitude of the Manly Board. Hasler did everything by the book. Greenberg did everything by the book. Manly Board were (and still are) a rabble and were impossible to work with.The basics are the same. Hasler wanted more money and a new contract and they wouldn't give it. Sure he deserved it and I will never know how there board didn't get sacked but he was contracted for another year and left and came across to us. Sure I don't know all the little insider stuff but as I said the basics are the same and the manly fans would agree, they are still fuming over it.
Manly could of kept Hasler, and we could of probably kept barba if we upgraded his contract. Difference is that Barba had one good year and then caused drama and had an average 2013 season. Hasler gave them 2 premierships and turned them into one of the best sides for the past 5 years, he was worth everything they could give him.....Barba isn't.Thing to remember is nice guys finish last, if we sit back and allow team's to steal players away from us that are on contract and don't do it in return on the right opportunities than we will lose. Sure we will sit back in our moral high chairs but losing marquee players without replacing them we will not win another premiership. We stole Hasler early so our hands are already dirty. I don't blame Bronco's in this I am upset with Barba and Orr and how they have conducted themselves!