News Xerri rejects $500k-a-season deal

Moedogg said:
I'm sure his value will increase dramatically in the coming seasons. 500k every year for the next 5 years is chump change for a player of his talent. NRL players only got a decade to make their money..
Click to expand...

He would get upgraded in 12 months if his manager is any good. Contracts are worthless these days if the player wants more money.
 
Wahesh said:
I don't understand why players reject money and force their club to go to the drawing board again, wasting everyone's time (including their own). It's simple... their agent should ask them what they want (while having an idea of his own what they are worth), and take this to the club. The club either says yes or no... that's it.
Click to expand...
That is way too straight forward and common sense for the players ( manipulators ) who prefer to play the bullshit game mate ie player managers!
 
KambahOne said:
That hole is only for this year so if we can't get Xerri for 2020, there's no point going after him for 2021 as we'll have Billy Smith back.
Click to expand...
Billy Smith looks like he could be physically dominant on the wing though.
Could end up being a backline of:
1. Tedesco
2. Smith
3. Manu
4. Xerri
5. Tupou
 
Prison Mike said:
Billy Smith looks like he could be physically dominant on the wing though.
Could end up being a backline of:
1. Tedesco
2. Smith
3. Manu
4. Xerri
5. Tupou
Click to expand...
Optomistic lol... Sure I'm sure Xerri will love to play wing
 
Wahesh said:
I don't understand why players reject money and force their club to go to the drawing board again, wasting everyone's time (including their own). It's simple... their agent should ask them what they want (while having an idea of his own what they are worth), and take this to the club. The club either says yes or no... that's it.
Click to expand...
Reverse the situation, what if the player would be happy with $600k and the club offers $700k, bad move by the agent to front up only asking for the $600k.

Go Dogs
 
$500k for a 19yo is a big offer. But in recent years a few clubs have paid massive overs to others that have exploded onto the scene. I think that it's still a bit of a gamble to offer it on a 5 year basis given that he's already had a shoulder reconstruction at 19. But if he improves and stays fit it could be a poor deal for him in the future. No doubt his manager would have pointed that out to him. Given his statements upon debuting there, it seems like he's pretty happy to be playing for them. But loyalty these days has a price tag and it wouldn't surprise me if he drops the loyalty for a better deal.

I don't know if the club has been among those talking to him or not. But we do have some decent prospects in the lower grades. Maybe we'll see some of them stake claims this year and negate the need to recruit another centre. Personally I hope that we return to a state where the juniors we bring through allow us to selectively snipe for positions in need.

I'm of the opinion that any wishing on my part won't change what the club does anyway. So if we wind up making a successful play for someone like Xerri I'll get excited about the signing after it gets announced rather than buying into speculation and having any kind of wishlist about potential recruits. I'm a spectator in every way. I don't lack respect for the people that have wishlists. But I do find it a bit amusing to see people tearing hair out over the fact that players they'd like to have here don't get recruited. I just don't see any point in stressing about things I have zero input on.
 
I cant work out how the sharks are under the cap they have 4 centres ffs dugan/jmoz/xerri and ramien
 
doggieaaron said:
I cant work out how the sharks are under the cap they have 4 centres ffs dugan/jmoz/xerri and ramien
Click to expand...

Been over the cap every year except 2016
How lucky was that.......

Fucking joke
 
coach said:
Been over the cap every year except 2016
How lucky was that.......

Fucking joke
Click to expand...

I thought Greenberg stated their gf side wasn't over the cap. That's technically excluding 13 players that weren't involved, so in all likelihood it's just a creatively constructed truth. Much like I could promise a lady 12 inches. I'm not going to say how many installments it would take to achieve that. But technically it's not a lie, just an exclusion of the facts to improve the sound of what I wanted to say.
 
Alan79 said:
I thought Greenberg stated their gf side wasn't over the cap. That's technically excluding 13 players that weren't involved, so in all likelihood it's just a creatively constructed truth. Much like I could promise a lady 12 inches. I'm not going to say how many installments it would take to achieve that. But technically it's not a lie, just an exclusion of the facts to improve the sound of what I wanted to say.
Click to expand...

Yeah 2016 wasn’t over but years before it was and after

It’s a joke
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top