likeadoggy
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2010
- Messages
- 5,852
- Reaction score
- 545
SBW is poison
Does that make Ferguson gential warts?He is poison, mundine is plague and nassar is disease.
Or AIDS lolDoes that make Ferguson gential warts?
What if it suits him to win the Premiership that year?I have forgiven him but no I don't want him back, Sonny Bill plays for Sonny Bill and only cares about what suits Sonny Bill. That's fine that he is that way as he has every right to look after his own best interests, but I don't care for players like that in our side as our team has always worked better when it's all for 1 and 1 for all, like a family. When players believe they are bigger than the team it creates disharmony and you get results like a certain somebody caused last year. Besides there is nothing wrong with the ability our current crop of forwards have and we also don't have to rely on any 1 individual to make things happen as they all do their job and share the load.
If he was, doesn't that mean he could legally touch genitals at will?Does that make Ferguson gential warts?
I went to school and played club footy with him haha.I'd rather bring back Gary Warburton.
Ok but the Roosters have established halves, we don't need the forwards especially SBW what we need is a good halfback and now a fullback. And I don't believe SBW single handedly won the Roosters the premiership nor would he single handedly win one for us with out the key players I just spoke of. And do you want to go back to relying on one player to provide the spark?What if it suits him to win the Premiership that year?
I mean everything you are saying is right, but SBW played for SBW last year. Disharmony or not the Roosters are the current Premiers
To be honest, last year he would of been that x-factor that could of won it for us because his play style is so suited to our 2012 form. I think if SBW was to return we need our 2012 form back to get the best game breaking performances people expect from him.Ok but the Roosters have established halves, we don't need the forwards especially SBW what we need is a good halfback and now a fullback. And I don't believe SBW single handedly won the Roosters the premiership nor would he single handedly win one for us with out the key players I just spoke of. And do you want to go back to relying on one player to provide the spark?
Would you be kind enough to define the term 'established' for me? . Last time I watched a game of football, Mitchell Pearce was mediocre (and that's been nice), and his opposing number 7 won Dally M in a GF beaten side.Ok but the Roosters have established halves, we don't need the forwards especially SBW what we need is a good halfback and now a fullback. And I don't believe SBW single handedly won the Roosters the premiership nor would he single handedly win one for us with out the key players I just spoke of. And do you want to go back to relying on one player to provide the spark?