Psycho Doggie
Kennel Immortal
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2014
- Messages
- 18,599
- Reaction score
- 26,797
He took identity politics to a whole new level and convinced a large subsection of society that he is their hero.So normal wage earning Americans are donating money to the BILLIONAIRE to fight a legal battle?
That is so F@#KED up.
What's your new point? - didn't we already go over this, several times?masks are not necessarily correlated with reductions in infection counts. See attached
2021-2024What's the new bets, Biden to be medical retired with in 12 months and the women to take over?
That's worth its own thread for realist to explode
Or Michelle?2021-2024
POTUS: Kamala Harris
Veep: Barack Obama
2024 Dem Ticket:
POTUS: Kamala Harris
Veep: AOC
Or Michelle?
Either way, so many minds blown, so many angry people.
You can keep saying that “masks would work if ppl would just wear properly”. But that is fantasy land. People don’t wear them properly because attempting to wear a mask for hours on end is not easy.What's your new point? - didn't we already go over this, several times?
We can do it again for the slow ones!
Appears "mask mandate" (a law/act/policy) r^2<1 as opposed to "masks" inferring a minimal impact on case numbers.
>>The mask wearer might need a re-do no their mask wearing course
Masks work just fine if worn and utilized properly and in conjunction with safe distancing, hand washing, mitigating face touching, etc., etc.,
The "moderate" faction will never allow AOC to get that far. There's massive in fighting within the Democrats at the moment for their poor showing in house and senate votes2021-2024
POTUS: Kamala Harris
Veep:BarackObama (edit: an Obama)
2024 Dem Ticket:
POTUS: Kamala Harris
Veep: AOC
Wait, I thought you were arguing against masks? Can't you see that your argument above actually proves that masks are important?You can keep saying that “masks would work if ppl would just wear properly”. But that is fantasy land. People don’t wear them properly because attempting to wear a mask for hours on end is not easy.
Surgeons don’t always do it perfectly either and then they have to resanitise and reapply a new mask.
Still better than nothing, a poorly placed mask ,a poorly 1meter social distance is still better than no mask and being shoulder to shoulder.You can keep saying that “masks would work if ppl would just wear properly”. But that is fantasy land. People don’t wear them properly because attempting to wear a mask for hours on end is not easy.
Surgeons don’t always do it perfectly either and then they have to resanitise and reapply a new mask.
I don’t argue against masks in a blanket sense. I argue for mask use in high risk scenarios like hospitals and doctors surgeries.Wait, I thought you were arguing against masks? Can't you see that your argument above actually proves that masks are important?
You need to wash and change your underwear too.You can keep saying that “masks would work if ppl would just wear properly”. But that is fantasy land. People don’t wear them properly because attempting to wear a mask for hours on end is not easy.
Surgeons don’t always do it perfectly either and then they have to resanitise and reapply a new mask.
Not necessarily true. Some commentary I was reading below:Still better than nothing, a poorly placed mask ,a poorly 1meter social distance is still better than no mask and being shoulder to shoulder.
So 1000+ cases ands 100 dead a day is not a high risk scenario??????I don’t argue against masks in a blanket sense. I argue for mask use in high risk scenarios like hospitals and doctors surgeries.
I also argue outside of these locations for people to make their own free choice about masks - if they want to they should be free to wear them.
What a load of crap.Not necessarily true. Some commentary I was reading below:
Intuition would suggest that facemasks offer a physical barrier preventing the emanation of droplets from the oral or nasal passages and therefore satisfy the efficacy requirement of the evidence ladder.
‘Venting’ is a phenomenon whereby air leaks at the interface between mask and face which can act to disperse potential contaminants originating from the pharynx.5The accumulation of moisture, during prolonged usage, may exacerbate this problem by increasing resistance to air flow through the filter itself. Moisture accumulation is also thought to facilitate the movement of contaminants through the material of the mask itself by capillary action.
These bacteria can subsequently be dislodged by movement. Friction at the face/mask interface has also been demonstrated to disperse skin scales which can further contribute towards wound contamination.
So essentially you'd be able to recognise the rational truth about masks except you've been hoodwinked by all the deceit out there that has effectively politicised mask wearing. That would explain why all of your arguments are half-baked at best.I don’t argue against masks in a blanket sense. I argue for mask use in high risk scenarios like hospitals and doctors surgeries.
I also argue outside of these locations for people to make their own free choice about masks - if they want to they should be free to wear them.