Parra_Power
Kennel Addict
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2007
- Messages
- 7,729
- Reaction score
- 0
Is this another Mancheste Unbited Spam Thread??? It seems to me like it is... So I'll add to it...
Manchester United manager Sir Alex Ferguson has launched a passionate defence of his club's right to tour the Far East.
United opened their visit with a 2-2 draw against J-League champions Urawa Red Diamonds in Saitama, Darren Fletcher and Cristiano Ronaldo netting for Ferguson's men.
Almost 60,000 fans turned out on a horrible rain-swept evening, once more proving the popularity United enjoy in Asia and giving credence to the belief the Barclays Premier League champions were right to stick to their guns and make the trip in the face of opposition from the Asian Football Federation and FIFA president Sepp Blatter.
The ongoing Asia Cup did mean United were forced to cancel their intended trip to Malaysia. However, Ferguson rejected the notion all United, one of half a dozen senior English clubs who will be visiting the region over the next fortnight, are interested in is cashing in commercially.
'We are not trying to steal fans from other clubs and it is not about just taking,' he said.
'Yesterday we arrived after a 14-hour journey and some of the players went to a school for the blind, while others went on a hospital visit to see some young kids.
'Football has changed a lot since I was a boy. Nowadays, people watch games on TV and tours like this give them the opportunity to see some of their favourite players in the flesh. That is exciting for them.
'We have also brought our soccer schools to this part of the world in order to try and help educate young players. It is part of Manchester United's history and tradition to give out information and knowledge and also add our name to particular causes.
'It is unfortunate the Asia Cup is on when we have the opportunity to come here.
'Every second year there is a World Cup or a European Championship, when we cannot give a tour the same kind of attention we are doing at the moment.'
Despite an inexplicable Edwin van der Sar blunder which gifted Urawa the opener and Shinji Ono's late solo effort that denied United victory, Ferguson expressed his satisfaction with their efforts.
At such an early stage of their pre-season campaign, the fluidity of United's passing was excellent and Ferguson feels many of his usual summer questions have already been answered.
'We always hope for early indicators about the progress of the players and team,' he said.
'I told them before the start of last season we were setting off on a journey that could take them a long way. We have had further evidence there is no regression.
'You always look to see whether the enthusiasm is still there, whether the desire is still there and whether the players are still enjoying their football. I think we saw that they are.'
Ferguson is hoping a resolution to the Carlos Tevez affair can finally be reached this week.
The Argentina striker is expected to undergo a medical on Thursday, although, as yet, there has been no breakthrough.
'Things are bowling along and we hope he comes but there is no news really,' said the United boss.
Ferguson has also ruled new arrivals Owen Hargreaves and Nani out of Friday's encounter with FC Seoul in the South Korean capital.
The pair are currently suffering minor knee and ankle injuries respectively and although no doubt keen to play, Ferguson argued there is little point risking injury at this stage.
'Owen has a touch of tendinitis, which happens with a lot of players at the start of the season,' he said.
'Maybe he will be okay for the third game of the tour. Nani will be back then.
'He picked up an ankle injury during the European Under-21 Championships. It is not long term but there is no need to rush him back.'
The one before last season was gun for themWho Cares, It's only United's Same Jersey for around 20 Season Now... No Difference from last Year...
I've got that jersey. with a no 7 on the back and ronaldo's name. I think it was his first year at the club.05/06 one man
LONDON, July 21 (Reuters) - Representatives of the Football Association will meet soccer's world governing body FIFA on Monday to discuss the long-running Carlos Tevez saga.
The Argentine forward's proposed transfer from West Ham United to Manchester United has reached stalemate because of an issue over who actually owns the player./news/story?id=446998&cc=
'My understanding is that a senior lawyer from the FA will come to Zurich to meet our senior legal people,' FIFA spokesman Andreas Herren told the BBC on Saturday.
An FA spokesman said: 'We have regular meetings with FIFA and next week we will raise the issue of third-party ownership on Monday.'
The two clubs have asked FIFA to settle the dispute and the FA are keen for the world governing body to tighten rules over third-party ownership of players, fearing that similar transfers could happen.
West Ham own Tevez's playing registration although agent Kia Joorabchian says he retains the striker's economic rights and therefore is entitled to any transfer fee.
West Ham were fined £5.5 million ($11.28 million) for breaking Premier League rules over the complex signing of Tevez last August. They were allowed to continue playing him after satisfying the Premier League that the third-party agreement with Joorabchian had been torn up.
Joorabchian accused West Ham this week of 'inconsistencies' in their statements regarding Tevez, while West Ham hit back by reiterating that they had terminated any agreements with Joorabchian on April 27.
The Premier League are insisting that any deal for Tevez should be between the clubs.
Tevez flew into Manchester last week but West Ham refused United permission for him to undergo a medical at Old Trafford.
Third-party ownership of football players is common in south America but was almost unheard of in Britain until Tevez and fellow Argentine Javier Mascherano joined West Ham.
Mascherano has since joined Liverpool.
Gabriel Heinze looks to be on his way out of Manchester United. But he won't be going to Liverpool. Gabriele Marcotti wonders why
THEATRE FOLK call it "breaking character". It's the shattering of an illusion, rather like when, as an eight-year-old, you might have run into the goody and the villain amicably having a G&T at the bar after a Christmas panto. Or perhaps discovering that the guy you thought was Father Christmas is actually your dad, and, no, he doesn't even bother dressing up in the suit.
The footballing equivalent occurs when supposed rivals sit down and do business together. We like to think that our heroes on the pitch feel about opposing teams pretty much the way we do. There are some opponents we harbour a secret admiration for, some opponents for whom we don't care either way and some opponents who we just plain hate.
As a rivalry, Liverpool and Manchester United falls into the latter category. And it's rivalry which goes beyond the two managers. After all you would imagine that Arsene Wenger would be further down Sir Alex's Christmas card list than Rafa Benitez and that if the Spaniard had to describe his least favourite colleague, his sights would turn to Stamford Bridge rather than Old Trafford.
advertisementYet while there is no animosity between the two bosses, the long-standing grudge match between England's two most successful clubs infects everyone, whether it's Liverpool fans stoning Alan Smith's ambulance or Gary Neville candidly announcing that he doesn't like Scousers.
Sir Alex understands those sentiments which is why, on Thursday, he categorically vetoed Gabriel Heinze's move to Anfield. "We have received a written offer from Liverpool for Heinze and we have rejected it because it's Liverpool. We wouldn't sell to Liverpool, Arsenal or Chelsea and we have relayed that to the agent. We have told him that in no uncertain terms," said United's chief executive, David Gill, who added that it would be a different matter if an offer came in from abroad.
When news of the veto reached Rafa Benitez, he was somewhat perplexed. Attitudes over such matters vary greatly on the continent. In his native Spain, of course, Barcelona and Real Madrid do not enjoy doing business with each other. True, the likes of Bernd Schuster (now, ironically, in charge at the Bernabeu), Michael Laudrup, Luis Milla and, most notoriously, Luis Figo moved from Barca to Real, while Luis Enrique went in the opposite direction. And just last month, Javier Saviola swapped the Camp Nou for the Bernabeu.
But in each of those transfers, the selling club had little control over the move, either because it was a Bosman or because a release clause was involved. The one exception was Samuel Eto'o. When he joined Barcelona in 2004, after five years on loan at Mallorca, he was part-owned by Real Madrid. In one of the most bone-headed moves in history, Real, after much discussion, opted to let him go, believing he "wasn't needed".
But, according to a source close to the Liverpool manager, Benitez genuinely believed there was a chance to do business with United. Part of it had to do with the fact that, in real terms, United and Liverpool isn't exactly a rivalry of equals in the way that Barcelona and Real is. After all, in the past 15 years, United have finished in the top two 12 times, Liverpool have done it once. But part of it had to do with the fact that Benitez saw it as the kind of deal which would genuinely help both clubs.
In Italy, such moves are far from rare. No fewer than four Champions League-winning Milan players, including Andrea Pirlo and Clarence Seedorf, came directly from crosstown rivals Inter in various swap deals. In fact, a few years ago, Benitez himself spoke admiringly of these cases as evidence that while rivaly on the pitch is important, if there is a deal to be done, there is no point in cutting off your nose to spite your face.
In fact, some of the Milan clubs' "mutually beneficial deals" are somewhat suspect and, indeed, the Italian FA have opened an enquiry. Between 2003 and 2005, the two clubs regularly "swapped" no fewer than eight players (mostly obscure ones who would then get shipped off on loan to the nether divisions) in what allegedly amounted to "creative accounting". The "trick" allegedly worked like this: Milan would sell players like goalkeeper Simone Brunelli (who has made a total of zero professional appearances in his six-year career to Inter for £2 million. At the same time, Inter would sell a guy like midfielder Matteo Deinite to Milan for £2m. No money would actually change hands and both players would then be loaned out to lower division clubs. But, on the balance sheet, it made sense. Both players would be signed to five-year deals, allowing the clubs to amortise the expense, which meant that, in that year's accounts, they would show up as a £400,000 debit.
Meanwhile, the transfer fee itself would be included straight away, as a £2m credit. And - presto! - with the stroke of a pen and a few contracts, both clubs would make a "paper profit" of £1.6m without actually spending a penny. The following year they could always sell both players back to each other, perhaps this time for £3m and the house of cards would continue to grow.
But back to Heinze. Obviously his move would not fall into this category. And you can see just why Benitez felt it would be mutually beneficial. United have spent close to £50m on Nani, Anderson and Owen Hargreaves. And, if and when the Carlos Tevez move goes through, that figure will rise to somewhere between £70m and £80m. The Glazers would like to see that figure clawed back to close to £50m. Selling Kieran Richardson to Sunderland brought in £5.5m, another £10m could be raised by off-loading two out of Alan Smith, Darren Fletcher, Mickael Silvestre and Giuseppe Rossi. That would still leave them short of the target, which is why Liverpool felt the £6m to £7m that Gabriel Heinze would have fetched would have seemed attractive.
Heinze is not the player he was in his first season at Old Trafford. At 29, he isn't getting any younger and, after missing most of the 2005-06 campaign through injury, he is now the second-choice left back behind Patrice Evra. Given that Silvestre and John O'Shea are adequate alternatives, one would have thought that the Argentine might have been expendable. While players who move to rival clubs often become hate figures (just ask Figo or Sol Campbell or, closer to home, Mo Johnston), Heinze isn't exactly Gary Neville in terms of being "United through and through".
From Liverpool's perspective it certainly made sense. Heinze knows the Premiership well, he can provide cover in central defence as well and, crucially, when he plays at left back, he does so with a defender's mentality, which is something Benitez values - as evidenced by the fact that, in key matches, he moved the marauding John Arne Riise into midfield and played the right-footed Alvaro Arbeloa on the left of his back four.
And yet, if Gill and Sir Alex are to be believed, this is one deal that won't happen. No matter how much sense it might make for both teams, nobody wants to "break character".