No no no that was Bennett not BarrettJust hearing on the radio that there is a number of players that have a Barrett clause stipulated in their contracts so it may be a hostage situation. If Barrett goes so could many key playas....
Well done everybody involved
I raised this once as a potential concern and a few drop-kicks shot me down.Just hearing on the radio that there is a number of players that have a Barrett clause stipulated in their contracts so it may be a hostage situation. If Barrett goes so could many key playas....
Well done everybody involved
Hang in there bud, the kennel is full of coaches and board members, just fight them allI raised this once as a potential concern and a few drop-kicks shot me down.
Anyway, if true, we can put the money towards actual spine players.
I find it hard to believe there are any clauses like that, Canterbury refuse to do it, remember the Mbye scenario ?Can anyone remember a player actually activating one of these clauses over the past 20 years? They always get talked about but I’m struggling to think of one case where it’s ever happened.
If that's true the club is fucking dumb for putting that in there contract but it's not like they have been setting the world on fireJust hearing on the radio that there is a number of players that have a Barrett clause stipulated in their contracts so it may be a hostage situation. If Barrett goes so could many key playas....
Well done everybody involved
Yeah I have a hard time believing there’s clauses like that to begin with and a even harder time believing a player would ever activate it.I find it hard to believe there are any clauses like that, Canterbury refuse to do it, remember the Mbye scenario ?
And for half the contract moneyImagine any players saying they only want to be coached by tbagz.