Won’t argue with opinion 2 but Australia can go all clean and environmentally friendly shit but Australia won’t even do nothing on a global scale it’s a water drop in the ocean.Ok, but as I asked before: lets forget the concept of climate change for a second:
Option 1 is more expensive to develop, produces harmful pollution and is finite.
Option 2 is cheaper, cleaner on the environment and humans, insulates our economy and at least part of the mix is renewable.
Doesn't option 2 just make more logical sense?