Okay. Everyone can take a breath again now.
1st half. Excellent.
2nd half, well.........
But let's get some perspective.
The first half of the second half was gifted back to the Rorters (send-off sympathy?)
Yeah, we had the "on 12" advantage at the time, but the overlap isn't as important if you have the ball; and at 7-1 "six-agains" and a 6-5 penalty count ,but with two of ours being "not-discretionary" (he couldn't not award the sucker punch and the leg drop - it's right there on tape), the Rorters were given same favourable "discretion".
We didn't handle the situation well (obviously) and losing Taffe, whose speed was really hurting the Rorters' backs, and forcing the reshuffle didn't help our cause at all.
The Rorters are a good enough team to be able to take that kind of leg-up, and run with it, especially against a team that is still learning to believe and has spent the best part of a decade in a losing habit.
So, from that perspective, who wouldn't happily welcome the 2 points (I'll take it over a brave loss, thanks).
We needed the points, we got them. How is of less importance.
We get to build from the 1st 40, and learn to be more resilient from the 2nd.
This is like learning from a loss, but getting 2 competition points for it.
1st half. Excellent.
2nd half, well.........
But let's get some perspective.
The first half of the second half was gifted back to the Rorters (send-off sympathy?)
Yeah, we had the "on 12" advantage at the time, but the overlap isn't as important if you have the ball; and at 7-1 "six-agains" and a 6-5 penalty count ,but with two of ours being "not-discretionary" (he couldn't not award the sucker punch and the leg drop - it's right there on tape), the Rorters were given same favourable "discretion".
We didn't handle the situation well (obviously) and losing Taffe, whose speed was really hurting the Rorters' backs, and forcing the reshuffle didn't help our cause at all.
The Rorters are a good enough team to be able to take that kind of leg-up, and run with it, especially against a team that is still learning to believe and has spent the best part of a decade in a losing habit.
So, from that perspective, who wouldn't happily welcome the 2 points (I'll take it over a brave loss, thanks).
We needed the points, we got them. How is of less importance.
We get to build from the 1st 40, and learn to be more resilient from the 2nd.
This is like learning from a loss, but getting 2 competition points for it.