NRL to consider limit on contact training as concussion crackdown continues

Mr. Ditkovich

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 9, 2017
Messages
1,670
Reaction score
3,462

The NRL will consider following the path of the NFL in limiting the number of full-contact training sessions to further reduce the risks of concussions.

The governing body has been criticised for a stricter enforcement of the rules midway through the season after a record 24 match review charges were laid during Magic Round. Only Storm forward Christian Welch chose to contest his dangerous-contact charge at the judiciary.

However, league powerbrokers are unapologetic about the crackdown and will consider instituting further measures to ensure the welfare of participants. One of those could come in the form of monitoring and limiting the amount of full-contact sessions that clubs are permitted to run.

Since 2011, the NFL has limited full-contact padded practices to 14 for the year, which equates to a maximum of one per week during the regular season.

The move came after studies of college football found the majority of head knocks occurred during training rather than in games. Since the rule was introduced, only 18 percent of NFL concussions have occurred in practice.

Having made it clear that any contact with the head and neck during games will result in immediate dismissal from the field, the NRL’s focus could soon turn to player welfare at training.

“That’s something we definitely have to look at, absolutely,” ARLC chairman Peter V’landys told the Herald.
“It’s my job to make it as safe as possible for the player. We have to review everything because there could be head knocks there too.

“I was ignorant of the fact that there is so much contact at training. It’s unregulated, so we definitely have to look at it, no doubt about it.

“I’m not being critical of any club or any coach, but it’s something that has been brought to my attention and naturally we will have a look at it.”

Australian boxing great Jeff Fenech, who has pledged his brain to the Australian Sports Brain Bank, has often spoken out about how fighters often receive their most brutal blows before they get to a fight. The “Marrickville Mauler” believes some of the worst concussive blows can be delivered during sparring sessions.

News that the NRL will also consider regulating pre-game training was well received by Dr Chris Levi, a respected neurologist who has treated the likes of Boyd Cordner and Tim Glasby after repeated head knocks.

“That is a very valid point, there’s not much point in only enforcing things on the field [during game days],” Dr Levi said. “You would look at the evidence around the adherence to that and how effective self regulation is, because at training it’s all about self-regulation, you don’t have a referee.

“It’s a sensible thing.”

The NRL is attempting to avoid the situation that occurred in the NFL, where the governing body agreed to pay damages that would amount to more than $1 billion over 65 years to resolve a host of concussion lawsuits from former players.

“I’ve said before that COVID was going to bankrupt us, but concussion could kill us,” V’landys said. “People are seeing that our intentions are good.”

In a further indication of how seriously the NRL is taking the concussion issue, it has fined Canterbury $20,000 its handling of Lachlan Lewis’ head knock in April. The Bulldogs sought a waived or reduced fine in responding to their breach notice, but the full fine will stand.

“While we respect the process that was undertaken and the fairness of the hearing we received, we are disappointed in the severity of the fine,” Canterbury CEO Aaron Warburton said.

“We also acknowledge that the determination does not call into question the professionalism capability or commitment of the club’s medical staff and management.

“The breach deals with a specific instance of non-compliance during round four.”
 

Caveman

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Sep 30, 2014
Messages
2,566
Reaction score
4,410
Bring on a break away competition where players sign a waiver knowing that the field.they choose to specialise in may have adverse effects on there body.

The money t hey make now, is much more than the fair compensation they would receive through a similar injury in the public.system.
 

Moedogg

Kennel Legend
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
13,805
Reaction score
20,877
It's hard to digest but I guess this is just the reality of professional sports these days.
I won't be surprised if it's mandatory for all players to wear a headgear in the future.

It won't kill the game but I will kill the NRL.
 

B-Train

Kennel Immortal
Joined
Mar 1, 2004
Messages
32,832
Reaction score
49,120
Players almost never get concussions at training as the contact is minimal in those sessions and they just grab each other instead of tackling.. That's exactly what the game needs right now though.. Less contact and physicality.. Idiots...

I guess there's no need to practice contact and defence at training since there's none in the games anymore.
 

CrittaMagic69

Kennel Immortal
Premium Member
Gilded
SC H2H Champion
2 x SC Draft Champ
Joined
Nov 15, 2013
Messages
73,103
Reaction score
78,858
Just cancel the game at this point lol
 

UmoGus

Kennel Legend
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
8,324
Reaction score
7,714
Next the players will have a tag hanging off each side that counts as a tackle and the ball can't be kicked above shoulder height
 

Caveman

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Sep 30, 2014
Messages
2,566
Reaction score
4,410
Players almost never get concussions at training as the contact is minimal in those sessions and they just grab each other instead of tackling.. That's exactly what the game needs right now though.. Less contact and physicality.. Idiots...

I guess there's no need to practice contact and defence at training since there's none in the games anymore.
I would support compulsory head gear, that should have been the first change they made.
 

Dognacious

Kennel Immortal
Staff member
Administrator
Premium Member
NF Draft Champion
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
23,593
Reaction score
11,028
I thought they might need more contact training to practice doing so without contacting the head?

And the blanket rule seems to unfairly punish accidental collisions too much. Like Tedesco falling into a player hitting his head. Its a contact sport (maybe not for much longer) so accidental collisions happen.

What if u accidentally clip your own player in a tackle, should u be sent off?

They need to be able to separate accidental from intentional, careless or reckless.
 

Dognacious

Kennel Immortal
Staff member
Administrator
Premium Member
NF Draft Champion
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
23,593
Reaction score
11,028
I would support compulsory head gear, that should have been the first change they made.
Yeh, they are so hell bent on being like the nfl, why not bring in helmets and headgear?
 

EzyB

Banned
Joined
May 15, 2021
Messages
1,337
Reaction score
1,699
Bring on a break away competition where players sign a waiver knowing that the field.they choose to specialise in may have adverse effects on there body.

The money t hey make now, is much more than the fair compensation they would receive through a similar injury in the public.system.
This 100%
 

chisdog

Kennel Legend
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
8,165
Reaction score
7,811

The NRL will consider following the path of the NFL in limiting the number of full-contact training sessions to further reduce the risks of concussions.

The governing body has been criticised for a stricter enforcement of the rules midway through the season after a record 24 match review charges were laid during Magic Round. Only Storm forward Christian Welch chose to contest his dangerous-contact charge at the judiciary.

However, league powerbrokers are unapologetic about the crackdown and will consider instituting further measures to ensure the welfare of participants. One of those could come in the form of monitoring and limiting the amount of full-contact sessions that clubs are permitted to run.

Since 2011, the NFL has limited full-contact padded practices to 14 for the year, which equates to a maximum of one per week during the regular season.

The move came after studies of college football found the majority of head knocks occurred during training rather than in games. Since the rule was introduced, only 18 percent of NFL concussions have occurred in practice.

Having made it clear that any contact with the head and neck during games will result in immediate dismissal from the field, the NRL’s focus could soon turn to player welfare at training.

“That’s something we definitely have to look at, absolutely,” ARLC chairman Peter V’landys told the Herald.
“It’s my job to make it as safe as possible for the player. We have to review everything because there could be head knocks there too.

“I was ignorant of the fact that there is so much contact at training. It’s unregulated, so we definitely have to look at it, no doubt about it.

“I’m not being critical of any club or any coach, but it’s something that has been brought to my attention and naturally we will have a look at it.”

Australian boxing great Jeff Fenech, who has pledged his brain to the Australian Sports Brain Bank, has often spoken out about how fighters often receive their most brutal blows before they get to a fight. The “Marrickville Mauler” believes some of the worst concussive blows can be delivered during sparring sessions.

News that the NRL will also consider regulating pre-game training was well received by Dr Chris Levi, a respected neurologist who has treated the likes of Boyd Cordner and Tim Glasby after repeated head knocks.

“That is a very valid point, there’s not much point in only enforcing things on the field [during game days],” Dr Levi said. “You would look at the evidence around the adherence to that and how effective self regulation is, because at training it’s all about self-regulation, you don’t have a referee.

“It’s a sensible thing.”

The NRL is attempting to avoid the situation that occurred in the NFL, where the governing body agreed to pay damages that would amount to more than $1 billion over 65 years to resolve a host of concussion lawsuits from former players.

“I’ve said before that COVID was going to bankrupt us, but concussion could kill us,” V’landys said. “People are seeing that our intentions are good.”

In a further indication of how seriously the NRL is taking the concussion issue, it has fined Canterbury $20,000 its handling of Lachlan Lewis’ head knock in April. The Bulldogs sought a waived or reduced fine in responding to their breach notice, but the full fine will stand.

“While we respect the process that was undertaken and the fairness of the hearing we received, we are disappointed in the severity of the fine,” Canterbury CEO Aaron Warburton said.

“We also acknowledge that the determination does not call into question the professionalism capability or commitment of the club’s medical staff and management.

“The breach deals with a specific instance of non-compliance during round four.”
I would have thought that if you are going to put this idea out there that you would have done your home work & found out how many concussions the clubs have had during training. Surely you base these decisions on facts rather than what happens in a different sport half way across the world?
 

Bulldogsteve

Banned
Premium Member
In the Sin Bin
SC H2H Champion
SC Top Scorer
Joined
Jun 29, 2020
Messages
8,007
Reaction score
14,535
Players almost never get concussions at training as the contact is minimal in those sessions and they just grab each other instead of tackling.. That's exactly what the game needs right now though.. Less contact and physicality.. Idiots...

I guess there's no need to practice contact and defence at training since there's none in the games anymore.
That’s incorrect mate, when they do scrimmages it is 100%. Souths had one yesterday, full contact. I agree there is no “shots” but it definitely is full on game contact
 

BELMORE

Kennel Addict
Joined
Oct 28, 2013
Messages
7,964
Reaction score
9,252
I heard Vlandys say they are considering appointing refs at clubs training facilities who will oversee scrimmages and report the high contact in which you can be suspended from games
 

chisdog

Kennel Legend
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
8,165
Reaction score
7,811
I thought they might need more contact training to practice doing so without contacting the head?

And the blanket rule seems to unfairly punish accidental collisions too much. Like Tedesco falling into a player hitting his head. Its a contact sport (maybe not for much longer) so accidental collisions happen.

What if u accidentally clip your own player in a tackle, should u be sent off?

They need to be able to separate accidental from intentional, careless or reckless.
What about players who get their head in the wrong place when making a tackle? Should the player he is tackling be sent off now too?
 
Top