Honestly, did no-one watch our 2nd half last week against Penrith with no Michael Ennis.? On 2 or 3 occasions Reynolds went to dummy half looked ahead and tried to run only to get monstered by the markers. On other times, his passes were behind his runners and otherwise often misdirected. Then Hokko went to dummy half a few times and threw the ball too far in front of Finucane to cause him to knock on and also stood before passing. Then Jackson went to dummy half and also provided generally slow service.
With only Ennis in doubt, only either Mybe or Reni can play. My question is, why do posters assume that the hooker has to be a middle defender? Id say play Mybe because he would provide generally quicker service from dummy half than Reni and is obviously faster out of dummy half to take the defence on. Our attack is the area of our game that needs a lift and Mybe will provide that more than Reni can. Our D has to be on all game or we are in trouble anyway.
With a whole week of ballwork, Mybe should be pretty slick as the DH come game day. You dont interchange hookers and thereby weaken other positions. Mybe is much younger than Reni and so should last longer in the game and if he can move a little wider in D then should last a whole game. Can anyone seriously think Reni would have the fitness to last the whole game if he was our DH and also had to be a middle defender. Also Mybe has a kicking game out of dummy half while Reni does not. I cans see that the Souths forwards will be looking to keep us pinned in our own quarter often as we run one out more than any other team to get out of trouble. So having Mybe at DH, he can kick if need be if Hokko or Reynolds are not in good clear position to kick.