I think there is a couple of things going on.
1. Barrett was "told" by the Panthers of no poaching of their players. So Canterbury ask the Laundy's to go on a poaching hunt, leaving Barrett and themselves out of it. Even though the board "signs off" on purchased players, there is nothing the club or Barrett can do, if a clubs major sponsor goes out on a "rogue hunt"
2. Ever since Coorey got the boot, Gould has been shitting on the club. "Barrett should stay at the Panthers" as the Dogs are a mess internally. "Big news" to come out of Canterbury in the next few days, with massive infighting, they really are a "rabble". He than gets his SMH colleagues to write up BS stories, like the one where Laundy's didnt pay a cent for this years sponsorship, and the next 2 years are only 500k per year. Disgruntled Dogs members are calling an EGM with 100 members signing off, etc, etc, etc
How the fuck would Gould know what is going on internally? The media has been pissed off all year, because the Canterbury board have been totally mute, and all of a sudden since Coorey got the boot, all internal discussions, plans and "fighting" have been leaked out?
Coorey didnt have a clue what the board was doing (footy wise) and since he was kicked out, he has been feeding shit to Gould and the media
I am pretty sure this has ticked off a number of board members, and now Gould is going to cop it from the Laundy's - as per this article. The Laundy's might or might not be going out into the bush, maybe they are going after someone else, but Gould has bitten more then he can chew, and the best thing which could happen to us, is if the Panthers go out in straight sets while we land a couple of their players