I think you’ll find all managers, the RLPA & even the NRL wont allow that to happen
May be the case, yet employment is based around performance.
You don't meet performance expectations, you're warned, and if ongoing, you're on your arse boy!
If he is not a willing participant to sign on with those conditions, he is not the type of player we need at the club, period!
I strongly suspect that to be the case, yet I would love for him to come to us and prove me wrong.
So our club is run by clowns too?
Who off contract would you like us to sign that fit the 1m bill?
I don't think Latrell is worth the reported amount but that's the situation we're in unfortunately. Also even knowing that I'd still sign him.
Well, there's the matter of a business in administration, due to fraud that the owners apparently didn't know about, despite blind Freddie being likely being able to see a glaring financial issue.
Two trips to the other side of the world, nil signings.
Prospective coach with dogs heritage and from all reports, would of loved to have returned, that was let thru to the keeper.
So yes, there's evidence that suggests the clown label is justified.
Why do we have to sign someone for a million?
Can we not sign a few players and/or forward pay a few players on our books already?
No it is not, we can say thanks but no thanks!
In fact, that is oft the harder choice taken by champions.