Kenty may not do nrl360 for a while

SexBomb

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 9, 2023
Messages
2,433
Reaction score
2,604
Those that yell loudest and go out of their way to write multiple posts about a topic of women bashing and defend the accused
He might be a Paul Kent, yet he, like everyone else, deserves the right of innocent until proven guilty.
Something you would be wise to consider.

Oh, and I'd rather we openly discuss contentious issues in the open, than the last millennium's approach of sweeping them under the rug.
It encourages solutions to problems.
Yet you be you and stick your head under that rug in your closet, buddy!
 

BELMORE

Kennel Addict
Joined
Oct 28, 2013
Messages
7,969
Reaction score
9,286
He might be a Paul Kent, yet he, like everyone else, deserves the right of innocent until proven guilty.
Something you would be wise to consider.

Oh, and I'd rather we openly discuss contentious issues in the open, than the last millennium's approach of sweeping them under the rug.
It encourages solutions to problems.
Yet you be you and stick your head under that rug in your closet, buddy!
Oh I didn’t know that making assumptions about the victim and the situation and blaming them is considered a discussion… seems like you already know what happened. Is that you Paul Kent?


As much as I despise the prick, I have a nagging feeling they were engaged in fetish/kink play, and she got a case of the regrets afterwards.
Or he didn't put a ring on it like she was expecting, so we find ourselves in this situation with him.
We all know how evil, manipulative, and vindictive a woman scorned typically is.
 

SexBomb

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 9, 2023
Messages
2,433
Reaction score
2,604
Oh I didn’t know that making assumptions about the victim and the situation and blaming them is considered a discussion… seems like you already know what happened. Is that you Paul Kent?
youtube.com/embed/0UPftoWxFnY?si=IdnX-lljL0XQdVds&start=185&end=191

If you had the intelligence to read between the lines, you would realise from what was not said, that I speak with authority.
An authority from being on the receiving end in the past, arsehole!
I should not have to open that box to discredit someone who enjoys shaming victims, yet here we are!
If there is a single part of decency within you, I will receive an open apology and your remarks withdrawn.
Remember arsehole, I privately afforded you the chance to do so under your terms and you doubled down.
 

SexBomb

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 9, 2023
Messages
2,433
Reaction score
2,604
@BELMORE
I see you were on yesterday morning and evening, yet what I don't see, is a reply from you!
 

Cappuccino

Kennel Legend
Joined
Aug 5, 2019
Messages
9,116
Reaction score
16,306
WE BACK

Court plays footage of Paul Kent’s distraught alleged choking victim

Warning: Graphic content
Rugby league journalist Paul Kent allegedly held a woman to the ground and grabbed her neck, leaving her with injuries to her arms and chest, a court has heard.
Kent, 53, who has temporarily been stood down from his roles as a senior writer for The Daily Telegraph and host of Fox Sports show NRL 360, is defending the domestic violence allegations. He is accused of attacking the 33-year-old woman at his home in Lilyfield in May.
Paul Kent arriving at the Downing Centre Court in Sydney on Monday.

Paul Kent arriving at the Downing Centre Court in Sydney on Monday.Credit: Kate Geraghty
He is facing a two-day hearing at Sydney’s Downing Centre Local Court, charged with common assault, intentionally choking a person without consent and assault occasioning actual bodily harm.

As the first day of the hearing got under way on Monday morning, the court heard Kent and the alleged victim had been dating on-and-off for some months and Kent broke it off the night before the alleged assault.

Kent sat on one side of the courtroom – dressed in a navy dark blue suit with a striped black tie – while the alleged victim’s supporters sat on the other.

The court was played body-worn police footage of the alleged victim speaking to police on the side of the road in the aftermath of the alleged attack.

In the recording, the distraught woman can be heard saying she visited Kent the day before – on May 11– and saw a bottle of prosecco while she was making coffee.

She told police that she asked Kent who owned the bottle, since “he’s trying to sort his mental health out”, and she left soon after.
She said that, the day after the prosecco conversation, she was “messaging him a lot” and called him before walking through his back door about 10.30am.

The woman told police Kent either “gets really angry and aggressive or shuts down and won’t respond to messages” when he’s angry.
“I walked into his office, and he said, ‘What are you doing here?’ and he was screaming,” she said in the body-worn footage.

The woman told police that, after a short argument, Kent pushed her to the ground and assaulted her after she took his phone from him.

“He grabbed me and … he moved his hands onto my neck, and when he got his phone and he let go, I was trying to reach my phone and he had his hand on my mouth,” the woman can be heard saying in the video.

The footage showed police taking photos of the woman’s arm and hand, which she alleged had marks on them, as well as her chest, which she claimed was red.

Kent gave a different version of events in separate police body-worn footage taken shortly after that conversation.

The recording showed Kent opening his front door to police and leaning on it as they spoke to him.

At first, he told police she was “just being nasty” and he didn’t want to say anything about the incident.

When the police officer told him there had been an allegation of assault against him, he said, “No.” He told police he had been ignoring the woman’s calls and messages after an argument the previous day, and was doing work in his office that morning when he saw her standing in his hallway.

“I told her to leave and went to walk her out … and she grabbed my phone,” he told police in the footage.

“She fell to the ground and screamed … She called a friend … and then she rang you guys.”

When police prodded further about his attempt to grab his phone back, Kent made an action of clasping his hands together close to his neck.
“She had it [the phone] like this,” he said in the footage.

“I didn’t do anything like that [she is accusing]. I didn’t strike her, she fell to the ground. I said she has no right to be in this house.”

Kent alleged the woman was “going through all [his] drawers and stuff”, adding later, “I’m not a f---ing lunatic.”

“If I get charged, there’s every chance I’ll get sacked,” he said in the footage.

“She’s f---ing irrational, mate.”

Kent alleged the woman called his boss after the incident, as she knew he worked in the media.

The body-worn footage cut to several other people standing outside the house, including one man who said he “runs Fox Sports”.
That man said: “She’s a nice girl. I f---ing feel for her, but she makes it up.”

After the footage was shown, defence lawyer Phillip Boulten, SC, cross-examined Constable Jack Winkler, who attended the scene.

Boulten asked Winkler if he’d seen photos that showed Kent had “a scratch to his right arm and two small nicks to his finger”, to which Winkler said, “I did.”

The court heard the only conviction on Kent’s criminal record was a low range drink-driving offence from August 1994.
 

steeliz

Kennel Addict
Joined
Sep 8, 2012
Messages
7,206
Reaction score
8,046
Guess he will be back on 360 next year................................................
 
Top