This is my opinion, not the journos. I started this whole conversation.. Of course injuries and concussions are a part of the game but surely when players are more under fatigue, they're more likely to get injured or have bad tackling technique potentially leading to more concussions. Last year there were tonnes of injuries too. It's not a preposterous argument.
I suppose this season's data will be the true barometer. If teams continue to be decimated by injuries and concussions at this rate, I don't see how people can insist it's not linked. We'll see what happens..
If you started this conversation, then I do apologise for saying that all this talk is just sh!t. I am sick of journos always biting the hand that feeds them ie the game.... (are you a journo??? lol lol -u better not be else i take my apology back!!! hahahaha)
I see your point, but one can argue that when some one is fatigued, there is less force in the contact, players missing tackles and or falling off tackles resulting in less collisions...
Also, lets see this week with a much dryer Sydney track if there are going to be this many injuries. Where there a heap of serious injuries at games played outside of NSW?
the only way I can link the 6 again with injuries is the fact that there is actual more game time which can result in more injuries as players are playing more minutes... more time played, more chance of players getting injured.. they go hand in hand... (has someone come up with this theory)