Nate DAWG
Kennel Legend
- Joined
- May 31, 2012
- Messages
- 10,992
- Reaction score
- 25,542
Cleary is a smart player. Cronk was a smart player. What is the metric you are using to say it’s not even close?Cleary is not smarter than Cronk, not even close.
Cleary is a smart player. Cronk was a smart player. What is the metric you are using to say it’s not even close?Cleary is not smarter than Cronk, not even close.
only fair way it can be settled if they both take the HSC testsCleary is a smart player. Cronk was a smart player. What is the metric you are using to say it’s not even close?
Consider this - Cronk and Cleary have both won 3 consecutive titles. Yes, Cronk has 1 more (arguably 3 more), however he did not achieve this feat at the ripe young age of 25 like Nathan has.Cleary is not smarter than Cronk, not even close.
NSW lose when Cleary plays also. He has won 7 and lost 7 in Origin. DCE is better at Origin than Cleary.Consider this - Cronk and Cleary have both won 3 consecutive titles. Yes, Cronk has 1 more (arguably 3 more), however he did not achieve this feat at the ripe young age of 25 like Nathan has.
Considering that as a halfback, Cleary has not yet hit his peak, and that NSW tend to lose when he's not playing, speaks volumes.
Mate Cleary is better now, than Cronk was ever. Cronk got smarter and better the longer he went, but Cleary has surpassed him already. There isn't 1 thing Cronk could do at the peak of his powers, that Cleary isn't already doing betterCleary is not smarter than Cronk, not even close.