_G-Dog_
Kennel Legend
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2006
- Messages
- 13,344
- Reaction score
- 7,789
If the siblings can also play footy.. we got 70% of the team sorted in a few years time..Also, 10 siblings!!! That’s a busy Bulldogs household right there!!!
If the siblings can also play footy.. we got 70% of the team sorted in a few years time..Also, 10 siblings!!! That’s a busy Bulldogs household right there!!!
He will have a career like Blake greenMy thinking re Cogger - what sorta ceiling do we think he has? I mean I hope for his own sake that he can be great.. but I just worry that he doesn't have the right attributes for that.. no X Factor, doesn't do things at pace, not a great kicking game.. you can't just be a reliable player and taste real success
They are trying very hard and as I’ve said before they aim to send a dozen weekly reports to the media. I’m glad we are getting positive media attention now
That’s great and well done DarcieThis story and the Lachie Lewis story a few weeks back came from the Fox League shoots that were happening last month... we got to speak to 2 players from each club. Such a great opportunity to get the players one on one with zero distractions... p.s glad that so many of you like this one!
He will have a career like Blake green
Need the same theory to be applied to cultivating the player/managers...get 'em on side until Gus takes overA dozen! I don't mind this strategy, it beats sitting back whinging about how unfair and biased the media is, which feels good for the moment, but achieves nothing.
I don't agree with "it achieves nothing", one of the measures sponsors, advertisers and potentials look at is how much media coverage a team gets. It's doesn't matter whether it FTA TV, Pay TV radio, newspapers, online or other social media. Every time they see potential for their name to be mentioned of their logo shown makes us more attractive to them. So the more media attention we can generate the more attractive we look the higher chance there is of landing a major sponsor plus retaining the ones we already have for longer and for money money. Fans want results, but sponsors want value for their money in brand recognition.
WTF, where was was the negative media in this ................ I must have missed it.Sure, its not like negative media attention ever cost us sponsors...
Thanks Darcie. Always good to see some positive media for the BulldogsThis story and the Lachie Lewis story a few weeks back came from the Fox League shoots that were happening last month... we got to speak to 2 players from each club. Such a great opportunity to get the players one on one with zero distractions... p.s glad that so many of you like this one!
Go back and look at what exactly I said achieves nothing, which you disagreed with.WTF, where was was the negative media in this ................ I must have missed it.
Maybe go back and read what I posted, "it" (meaning press like this) most definitely achieves something.
Go Dogs
The problem was that your response was completely out of context with the post that it was in response to (and that you quoted). Not disagreeing with what you said, just that it was not in any way relevant to the post it was relying to. If you had simply posted it on its own, without falsely linking it to a quote, then it wouldn't have drawn the response. The context of the post was what was important.Go back and look at what exactly I said achieves nothing, which you disagreed with.
I think it is a bit far fetched to say "completely" out of context. And an exaggeration to say "not in any way relevant". My reply was pretty straight forward though subtle, I picked up on the figure of articles the club sends out each week, and contrasted it with a summation of the common view that tends to get expressed on TK, that the media are biased against us. Such a view can induce paralysis, so its good to see the club being proactive to the degree that it is. So sitting back and moaning is what doesn't achieve anything, and your response was "it does achieve something". Which seems kinda weird.The problem was that your response was completely out of context with the post that it was in response to (and that you quoted). Not disagreeing with what you said, just that it was not in any way relevant to the post it was relying to. If you had simply posted it on its own, without falsely linking it to a quote, then it wouldn't have drawn the response. The context of the post was what was important.
It appears as a desperate need to post something negative even if it had nothing to do with the positive subject at hand.
Go Dogs
Good storyThis story and the Lachie Lewis story a few weeks back came from the Fox League shoots that were happening last month... we got to speak to 2 players from each club. Such a great opportunity to get the players one on one with zero distractions... p.s glad that so many of you like this one!