Exclusives for 09

[Senorita]

wont beleive it till its confirmed my policy. but i wouldnt like any rooster to come to the doggies.. its not nfl or afl we dont have drafts altho it seems as as tho we do

 

[greekstyla]

Yes i respect your opinion.

However i will not vilify you, for holding that opinion to get a power trip.

 

[MichaelM]

here's a scoop - we will sign players for next year - some will be forwards and others backs

some of our existing squad will not be re-signed and a couple of our under 20's squad will get NRL contracts.

meanwhile 2008 is 4 rounds old and we have a great chance of making the eight - from there who knows

 

[Senorita]

appreciate the info chico its just that i guess we all have diff opinions bout the matter... i just dont want him playin for us.. lol...

Kennelers- it seems to me that when i did go out of my way- to give YOU FIRST HAND, INSIDER exclusives (nearly putting my job on the line) all i get is plenty of replies without substantial thought and consideration for it. Whether the selected few who read these messages cannot understand, or otherwise use it to their advantage to vilify me.

Go ahead.

It serves no purpose but highlights the manner in which how people try to undermine fellow passionate Canturbury Bulldog Supporters. Who collectively enbrace a common theme- FOR THE TEAM.

I do not need to say "i told you so", that articles suddenly appeared about it as circumstances change weekly. But for me to reveal something without any substantiation is something which i will take blame for.

I thought this thread could have served some purpose- in which it already did by getting the press to say it for you guys to believe it.

So next time, you can get your exclusives through Searching articles.

 

[Özil]

Kennelers- it seems to me that when i did go out of my way- to give YOU FIRST HAND, INSIDER exclusives (nearly putting my job on the line) all i get is plenty of replies without substantial thought and consideration for it. Whether the selected few who read these messages cannot understand, or otherwise use it to their advantage to vilify me.

Go ahead.

It serves no purpose but highlights the manner in which how people try to undermine fellow passionate Canturbury Bulldog Supporters. Who collectively enbrace a common theme- FOR THE TEAM.

I do not need to say "i told you so", that articles suddenly appeared about it as circumstances change weekly. But for me to reveal something without any substantiation is something which i will take blame for.

I thought this thread could have served some purpose- in which it already did by getting the press to say it for you guys to believe it.

So next time, you can get your exclusives through Searching articles.

the thing is i wont believe the **** that is put on the paper unless it is a confirmation through the clubs media reps.

how many times has malcom noad proved the media wrong when he was CEO?

 

[Senorita]

p.s i would never vilify a fellow passionate doggies supporter.. any other info? ill keep em in mind..

 

[greekstyla]

the thing is i wont believe the **** that is put on the paper unless it is a confirmation through the clubs media reps.

how many times has malcom noad proved the media wrong when he was CEO?

and when your club media rep gets sacked for sending out false and misleading information in a board election, i think that doesn't set a good example.

Lets face it, the bulldogs mentality is to release it slowly- capture market opinion, if thats ok set a date and time for a media release.

and as for malchom noad- as much i go for the bloke- he's no saint either- too many grudges that were unrelated to the bulldogs and his personal matters with former News Limited Collegues left soured tastes on many fans. You just needed to pick up a Sunday Newspaper to see it- even his media release showed glimpses of it.

This is the bulldogs- not politics and personal agendas unrelated to league.

well thats my opinion.

 

[greekstyla]

Exclusives

* Steve Michaels to the Dogs in 09.
* Groom to get half back spot in 09.
* 2009 will be the deciding year for the bloke, if he doesn't perform we'll be knocking on Melbourne's door...

on other news...

Greenburg (Dogs ceo) is giving P.R lessons to players on how to respond to the media.

 

[B-Train]

Exclusives

* Steve Michaels to the Dogs in 09.
* Groom to get half back spot in 09.
* 2009 will be the deciding year for the bloke, if he doesn't perform we'll be knocking on Melbourne's door...

on other news...

Greenburg (Dogs ceo) is giving P.R lessons to players on how to respond to the media.

Great another Weidler wannabe.

This is on the back of your exclusives at the beginning of the thread which really came to fruition (sorry couldn't figure out how to do the blue writing) Steve Michaels is almost a certainty for the Titans unfortunately and what the hell does this mean?:

"* 2009 will be the deciding year for the bloke, if he doesn't perform we'll be knocking on Melbourne's door..."

 

[kimlo]

Great another Weidler wannabe.

This is on the back of your exclusives at the beginning of the thread which really came to fruition (sorry couldn't figure out how to do the blue writing) Steve Michaels is almost a certainty for the Titans unfortunately and what the hell does this mean?:

"* 2009 will be the deciding year for the bloke, if he doesn't perform we'll be knocking on Melbourne's door..."

It means cooper cronk HTH

 

[B-Train]

It means cooper cronk HTH

Thanks Kimlo, if he doesn't perform then why would we want him? Lol. Just love all of this inside info that some people make up. Very imaginative.

 

[kennyy]

Makes sense.

 

[kennyy]

Michaels is a good footballer

 

[kennyy]

Its grooming me!

 

[greekstyla]

Thanks Kimlo, if he doesn't perform then why would we want him? Lol. Just love all of this inside info that some people make up. Very imaginative.

Remember Holdsworth's excellent first year? He performed

Now he's not.

Yet we still have him.

Why?

Because we have no choice. Our attack is based on him being there. If you wanna change it- change it when were are going down or at the end of season. Look at what Souths are doing 5 half back combinations and counting- if folkes drops holdsworth- we are in trouble.

 

[B-Train]

Remember Holdsworth's excellent first year? He performed

Now he's not.

Yet we still have him.

Why?

Because we have no choice. Our attack is based on him being there. If you wanna change it- change it when were are going down or at the end of season. Look at what Souths are doing 5 half back combinations and counting- if folkes drops holdsworth- we are in trouble.

What???

Holdsworth was already under contract, then dropped his form.

Being out of form isn't exactly a good plan when trying to sign someone (Cronk) as you alluded to.

Either way, almost certain he will stay with the Storm.

 

[greekstyla]

Where did i say Holdsworth being there in 2009 with Cronk as you aluded to?

 

[B-Train]

So you meant if Groom doesn't perform in 09 we will chase Cronk?

 

[p0rn.star]

yet another thread claiming so much .... blaH at the supposed signings

 

[Junior DJ]

what a load of junk