please explain which part is incorrect, if not then shut the fuck up and accept that this happened
did the leading experts compare RaTG13 with covid think it was engineered? yes/no
did they think it was engineered because of those 12 specific nucleotides being out of place? yes/no
were they told to not investigate because of international harmony and to prevent harm to science? yes/no
did the leading scientists then write up a paper claiming that covid was natural, completely opposite to their private opinion? yes/no
in that paper, there was nothing that was presented that would be the reason to change their mind? yes/no
did kristian andersen say that the release of RaTG13 was the reason he changed his mind? yes/no
if so was he lying? yes/no