- Joined
- May 15, 2017
- Messages
- 23,207
- Reaction score
- 42,765
I know, I’ve seen your work before .I knew exactly what I was doing
I know, I’ve seen your work before .I knew exactly what I was doing
Season 1, Episode 2 of ‘Zil The Prosecutor’.*world war 2 holocaust documentary*
everybody: nazi's were the worst war criminals in history
dinkum dog: they were just testing out their gas chamber to see if it worked on not, they should just pay a fine
im mocking your lack of seriousness on this topic, even now you refuse to show any interest and downplay it, but we are talking about rwanda genocide and holocaust level of badI’ve never mentioned Rwanda.
We need a new TV show - not Judge Judy but Zil The Prosecutor. It would be under the comedy genre .
I’m very serious.im mocking your lack of seriousness on this topic, even now you refuse to show any interest and downplay it, but we are talking about rwanda genocide and holocaust level of bad
you should be more interested about it but of course this is an argument that you just can't lose
So, you’re the one accusing big pharma of ‘mass murder / genocide’ and saying how awful that is yet in the same breath you’re endorsing a return of vigilante style executions. A tad hypocritical there Zil…now i understand the satisfaction and theory behind the public executions they used to have like public hangings
they should bring it back for this situation
my proportions are correct and this is the biggest scandal in world history, its not a judge judy case or something that you can escape with a fineI’m very serious.
There’s no evidence the PV thing is true and we’ll wait and see. Their track record ain’t great.
It’s you blowing it out of proportion not me.
vigilante style executions for the perpetrators of this mass murder and genocide, absolutelySo, you’re the one accusing big pharma of ‘mass murder / genocide’ and saying how awful that is yet in the same breath you’re endorsing a return of vigilante style executions. A tad hypocritical there Zil…
And who said anything about a fine other than you?my proportions are correct and this is the biggest scandal in world history, its not a judge judy case or something that you can escape with a fine
So unproven conspiracies have ‘got you there’.vigilante style executions for the perpetrators of this mass murder and genocide, absolutely
and thats coming from someone who usually opposes the death penalty, this case has got me there
i said mass murder and you said no, so you think this is a lesser crimeAnd who said anything about a fine other than you?
That’s right, no-one.
But you’ve moved to the penalty phase before a verdict has even been reached.
We all get that you’re a poor prosecutor so let’s not try to play judge and jury as well, eh? .
When I was in Year 5, a bloke named Rodney challenged me to a game of ‘unders’ with footy cards. You see I’d beaten him so many times on ‘flicks’ and ‘tops’ that he thought maybe he could win some of his cards back with ‘unders’. Admittedly, ‘unders’ wasn’t my strongest game, but when he claimed victory very dubiously and tried to take a substantial pile of cards, a teacher had to be bought in to mediate. I was vindicated and kept the cards but Rodney bleated about the ‘injustice’ of it all pretty much until we went our separate ways at the end of Year 6.somebody name a bigger scandal than this
I didn’t say anything about the severity of anything.i said mass murder and you said no, so you think this is a lesser crime
name a scandal bigger than this and a crime bigger than this
Why do you have to bring Lebanon into everything?Insightful Nasheed. You saying my argument is BS has so much weight. I’ll await you to bring a Lebanese angle to the Covid chat .
I don’t, that’s you Nashy.Why do you have to bring Lebanon into everything?
Well, hasn’t the wind been taken out of your sails Zil…the pfizer response
Pfizer Responds to Research Claims | Pfizer
no doubt this will be used by the pharmaceuticals to show that it was all scientific and cool
police "did you kill them OJ?"
OJ Simpson "no"
police "ok so it must have been someone else"
critically they say they didn't perform this research and later describe them doing so in limited cases and they don't address this executive in any way, so you can assume he works for them as described