clubs to consider forming a breakaway competition

Status
Not open for further replies.

JERRY LEE

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
1,077
Reaction score
0
BRAD WALTER
December 12, 2009 Be the first to comment


With momentum towards an independent commission for rugby league stalling this week, the 16 clubs have been called to a meeting to discuss walking away from the NRL and setting up a new competition. Brad Walter reports on the most significant meeting of rugby league's powerbrokers since the start of the Super League War.

A council-of-war meeting in Sydney next month comprising the chief executives, chairmen, coaches and captains of all 16 NRL clubs is set to consider orchestrating a ''reverse Super League'' and forming a breakaway competition if the ARL and News Ltd fail to reach agreement on an independent commission.

The high-powered meeting is the most significant in the game's history since the gathering at the SFS that ended the Super League war in 1997 and will dramatically ramp up pressure on the ARL and News Ltd to hand their 50 per cent stakes in the NRL to the clubs.

If that doesn't occur happen before the January 18 gathering at the Sheraton On The Park, the Herald has been told the clubs will considering quitting the NRL to start their own competition. It is understood lawyers have been studying the licensing agreements that bind each club to the NRL to see if they can be broken. Asked if the clubs were considering a ''reverse Super League'', one official told the Herald: ''Yes, except it will be unanimous between clubs, players and coaches. There will be no divide this time''.

Should the clubs agree to such a daring move, they are likely to have the support of News Ltd, which has been putting pressure on the ARL to finalise an deal.

With the ARL having been unable to top up the $20 million reserves it had before News Ltd's raid on the game in 1995, it is unlikely to be able to fund a court case to stop the clubs forming their own competition, which may be called Rugby League Australia.

Even if the clubs were unable to break away now, they could do so when their NRL licensing agreements expire in 2012 - the same year the game's television deals and other major financial deals also finish.

Without access to the game's elite players, the NSW and Queensland Rugby Leagues would not be able to run State of Origin or other representative fixtures.

ARL officials insist they are working towards an agreement with News Ltd before the start of the season but frustrated clubs believe they are stalling after a board meeting in Brisbane this week failed to agree on conditions negotiated with News Ltd by those driving the independent commission.

''It is a long time since everyone was united on one cause,'' one club CEO told the Herald.

One official involved in the negotiations told the Herald the independent commission would either be in place by the start of the 2010 season in March - ''or it won't happen at all''. NSWRL and QRL directors at Tuesday's ARL board meeting in Brisbane declared their support for the formation of an independent commission but expressed concerns about the structure and the safeguards for preserving representative football and junior development.

Under the proposed model for the independent commission, the 16 clubs would elect eight independent commissioners to run the game and the ARL would be wound up. To gain appointment, a commissioner would have to win 75 per cent support from the clubs. Commissioners would be unable to sit on the board or have a role with any club or league body. However, the first commission will be appointed by News Ltd and the ARL, with ARL chairman Colin Love to be inaugural chairman of the new body for a period of one or two years.

NRL chief executive David Gallop will perform the same position for the new body, which is to be known as the ARL commission.

In exchange for handing back the game, News Ltd wants to extend the company's first-and-last rights of refusal deal until 2027, which is five years longer than the agreement negotiated during the peace talks that led to the end of the Super League war in 1997. News Ltd also wants a $20m exit fee that will be funnelled back into the Melbourne Storm to cover the club's projected losses for the next six years. Without such a guarantee, it is unlikely the Storm will be able to find another owner to buy the club from News Ltd.
 

League Freak

Kennel Established
Joined
Apr 7, 2005
Messages
783
Reaction score
2
Dont even worry about it.


The clubs are trying to force the hand of the NSWRL/QRL blazer brigade who are holding the game back.


Basically the clubs want to be able to say "Sign off on the independent commission or you'll find yourselves phased out of the new administration anyway".

Keep in mind that the current NRL is half owned by the ARL, which in turn is controlled by the NSW and Queensland RL's. So effectively what clubs are looking at is how they can cut ties with the 50% ARL share, have their own competition which would then be controlled by an independent commission, and not let the ARL hold things up.


EVERYONE outside of the ARL (And many within it) want this to go through. However some old heads who do nothing for the game dont want to lose their power.

Roy Masters has been writing on behalf of this lot that don't want change, and you can see it in the tone of his articles. According to him, its all about privately owned clubs wanting to take all the games money, and the rest of the game will suffer.

Thats a load of rubbish.



So this wouldn't be a "Break away". It would basically be the game cutting ties with an old administrative structure that is broken and hasn't worked for years. Phasing it out of the future independent commission, and hoping that what is left of the NSWRL and QRL eventually come back to the table and get absorbed into the new independent commission anyway.
 

d_eye

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
1,953
Reaction score
0
Those old red necks need to stop being selfish and get over themselves.
 

B-Train

Kennel Immortal
Joined
Mar 1, 2004
Messages
32,857
Reaction score
49,203
This won't happen.

I wish the clubs were this steadfast in their opposition to Gallop though.
 

Mr Invisible

Banned
Joined
Apr 26, 2008
Messages
0
Reaction score
47
All the time the word Gallop is involved with Rugby League, it'll be ****ed.

It's as simple as pissing off the ENTIRE structure of the NRL.

Each club has an ARL representative making up a 16 strong board.

That board oversees stuff like Player Behaviour, Judiciary Matters, and Ref Descisions.

Either that or set up panels for all 3 of the above. They are the biggest issues with todays game (well and Gallop).
 

GATE7

Kennel Established
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
600
Reaction score
0
Those old red necks need to stop being selfish and get over themselves.

lol...I copped an infraction and 24 hour ban for using that word in another topic. They classified it as a "racial comment". Lol.

Couldnt agree with more what youre saying though ...its just you took the word right out of my mouth.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top