Bazildog
Kennel Legend
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2014
- Messages
- 11,356
- Reaction score
- 20,821
JT's record just in SOO blows Cronk and Nosecandy boy from Newie out of the park.. Fuckin cochroaches...JT isn't even better than Cronk.
JT's record just in SOO blows Cronk and Nosecandy boy from Newie out of the park.. Fuckin cochroaches...JT isn't even better than Cronk.
Remind me what happened in 2014 in a certain 3 game series when Cronk went down injured? I'm waiting.JT's record just in SOO blows Cronk and Nosecandy boy from Newie out of the park.. Fuckin cochroaches...
Now you sound just like a Joey fan pulling out a single year or game.. I can reply with hours of JT magic if you like?Remind me what happened in 2014 in a certain 3 game series when Cronk went down injured? I'm waiting.
Go for it. I don't deny that JT had more individual brilliance in his game but Cronk overall was the better halfback and severely underrated because of who he played with. Cronk does more for this Bulldog side than JT.Now you sound just like a Joey fan pulling out a single year or game.. I can reply with hours of JT magic if you like?
Agree to disagree.Nope. Give me Cronk @ halfback over JT everyday of the week.
Don't tell me that some moron said JT is better than Joey?JT isn't even better than Cronk.
JT didn't dominate his entire career. There were many years when he was at his peak that the Cowboys didn't even make the 8. From 2008-2010 JT went 17-40 playing for the Cowboys.Agree to disagree.
JT did it all over a full career mostly with an ordinary team. Cronk only came alive half way through his career. Alway played with star studded teams. No comparison when you talk of total dominance.
JT excelled when playing with a rabble. Cronk never played in a team that wasn’t full of internationals. And wasn’t the dominant player in any team except his stint with the Roosters.JT didn't dominate his entire career. There were many years when he was at his peak that the Cowboys didn't even make the 8. From 2008-2010 JT went 17-40 playing for the Cowboys.
JT didn't excell when playing with rabble. I just proved to you that him & the Cowboys were terrible between 2008-2010. JT didn't make them better at that time.JT excelled when playing with a rabble. Cronk never played in a team that wasn’t full of internationals. And wasn’t the dominant player in any team except his stint with the Roosters.
Cronk isn’t in the conversation for greatness. Joey & JT certainly are. Cleary will be better than all of them by the time he calls it a day.Also I love how when people are talking about who was better they totally don't discuss defense which is half the game.
Joey was the GOAT defensive halfback. Cronk was good. JT was terrible.
I'm not talking about 96, I'm taking about the red hot 97 Broncos side. If you want to go down the path of using teams previous years as a measuring stick, why didn't they beat the 98 Broncos side when the comp was united?He beat Manly in the GF who had made the previous 2 GF & were the defending champions. In 1996 when all teams were in the comp the GF was 2 ARL teams.
Also Nathan was in the most stacked team in the NRL. Panthers didn't win the GF because of him. If Latrell wasn't suspended then Souths would've won. Knights literally won because of Joey.
Saying Cleary was better than Joey when they were both 23 is dumb and/or a lie.
Yeah playing in 9 GF isn't greatness....................Cronk isn’t in the conversation for greatness. Joey & JT certainly are. Cleary will be better than all of them by the time he calls it a day.
Are you blind to the teams he was in?Yeah playing in 9 GF isn't greatness....................
I didn't know that the 1998 Broncos team played in 1997. My bad. The Panthers 2003 GF winners are shit because they didn't beat the Bulldogs 2004 team..................... Your argument keeps getting dumber. I'm out.I'm not talking about 96, I'm taking about the red hot 97 Broncos side. If you want to go down the path of using teams previous years as a measuring stick, why didn't they beat the 98 Broncos side when the comp was united?
And knights won because of Robbie O'Davis that day, Johns wasn't even known as the best player in the game during that time, that period belonged to Langer and Stewart.
You're the only person that I've ever seen say Cronk isn't great. He's clearly a top 10 halfback of all-time. If you don't think that he's great then you're the one that is blind.Are you blind to the teams he was in?
Cameron Smith a certain future immortal ran the show at Melbourne for Cronks whole time there.
He was part of the puzzle no question but not the main man. I’m not saying he wasn’t good but great? You have a lesser standard to me if Cronk is a considered great. He was very good IMO.
So Allan Langer wasn't great? Peter Sterling? Steve Mortimer? Ricky Stuart? That's crazy.Top 10 is about right. My version of great is the best of the best top 3 of all time. Which I don’t think he is. He never played in a team that wasn’t stacked.