@ASSASSIN we need to do something about this guy. He's spreading negativity and misinformation about our produce. Someone needs to come knocking at his door in the middle of the night.
You are smarter than that...Not every club is surrounded by multi millionaires !
All TPA's for players are supposed to be "non'affiliated" with the club they are contracted too, that's already in the rules, and they could be audited by the tax department as they could cross reference what the player submits versus what the company providing the TPA submits to the tax office. And you can't hide cash anymore, not in the sums that we supposedly provide on the side. Even if you reduced cash payments to less than the current limit of identifiable [10K], regular payments of that amount over the course of a season would be identifiable.
Fair enough, but what about your club, it's sponsored by Arthur laundy who is worth about $500 mill, why hasn't your club adopted our undetectable rorting process? Or have they which accounts for your spending spree...cue X Files music.
I'm leaving the limo at home tonight and taking out the black van with the "clean up" crew.
I ask you the question, how many Arthur Laundys does your club have ?
It's funny you say that, when Laundy's was announced as your clubs major sponsor he was quoted as saying he admires Nick and what he has done for the Roosters and wants to emulate it. Welcome aboard the rort train.I ask you the question, how many Arthur Laundys does your club have ?
Arthur Laundy isn't a Nick Politis...where has he been until now ?
Riding in on his white horse with the Andersons & Co. In my opinion he is in it for himself and his son only !
I advise you to do your math on the cap, for now we are compliant and working hard on 2023 and beyond !
Although we might have to call uncle Nick for some tips
People like this didn't become rich because they are unintelligent, it's quite the opposite.It's funny you say that, when Laundy's was announced as your clubs major sponsor he was quoted as saying he admires Nick and what he has done for the Roosters and wants to emulate it. Welcome aboard the rort train.
Some clubs have morals.
If you're going to try and re-write history to suit your agenda at least try and make it convincing. The NRL never knocked back south's application for Suaalii.
It all depends on who you choose to believe, from the NRL;
www.foxsports.com.au
Just because it didn't work doesn't mean that it didn't happen, the NRL should have said no, twice over.
As in the kind of clean up crew we saw in John Wick?
I never said souths had approval, I said they were not knocked back as you had stated previously. The NRL were open to allowing Suaalii to play before he was 18 for souths, all we did was leverage that allowing for our benefit and souths suffering.
From the same article quoting Crowe.While we are quoting, perhaps this one also doesn't suite your expectation bias;
‘It’s not a cap, it’s a sombrero!’: Crowe breaks silence on Suaalii with thinly-veiled Roosters swipe
‘For a start, we work to cap’: Crowe breaks silence on Suaalii with Roosters ‘sombrero’ swipe
“We’re not quite sure what the difference is between our dollars and somebody else’s dollars, because theoretically the figures are the same. Who knows?”
“For a start, we work to the salary cap, unlike other people who we won’t discuss. Those blokes who keep plucking magic players out of the sky. What’s the joke: it’s not a cap, it’s a sombrero, isn’t it?”
The NRL wanted the publicity as much as we did and given that's all SBW generated at the time it was probably the right call.
This whinging about the 12 months beforehand pisses me off;
'Bad look' threatening to light new Smith bomb
'You just really spit in the faces of the fans'wwos.nine.com.au
It is written into contracts that the player is obligated under the playing agreement that he/she must....
What about Cronks mba at Harvard being 100% by the Roosters worth close to 200k
Haha Dolphins!