Bulldogs at sixes and sevens (Rugby League Writers)

EuroNymous

Kennel Participant
Joined
Mar 20, 2022
Messages
131
Reaction score
216
he Canterbury-Bankstown Bulldogs mixed things up in NRL Round 8 with Matt Burton playing at halfback and Kyle Flanagan wearing the No.6 jumper. It’s not the first time we’ve seen a struggling club make this change in an attempt to kick-start their attack, but it hasn’t always produced positive results.

Against the Cronulla Sharks on Saturday night, it did… sort of. We saw enough from this new-look halves pairing for Cameron Ciraldo to persist with it in the short term, as Burton played a distributing role through the middle while Flanagan and Hayze Perham got more involved as ballplayers on the edges.

If nothing else, the positional switch seemed to trigger a shift in attacking mentality.

Instead of Burton being the go-to creative option, it was Flanagan and Perham who were free to survey the defence and pick their moments in attack. They had some early joy targetting the spaces around Matt Moylan and Siosifa Talakai on the right edge, finding metres in yardage and points in good-ball.

Identifying Moylan and Talakai were compressing the defence in yardage, Perham took advantage of the speed mismatch out wide to send Jake Averillo downfield in an early exit set:


In good ball, Flanagan and Perham played to the same principle to set up Braidon Burns’ opening try.
A good carry from Max King – and a woeful defensive effort from Cronulla – helped to trigger the scoring action:

Braden Hamlin-Uele is so passive in the line here that Teig Wilton is unwillingly dragged into the King tackle. Wilton ends up around the legs and is slow to peel, leaving the Sharks horribly short down the blind side on the following play.

Flanagan plays his role smartly here. Corey Waddell supporting off his hip invites Talakai to stay tight with Moylan in the defensive line, and the big centre can’t recover quickly enough when the pass goes out the back. Good hands from Perham and Averillo finishes things off from there.
The Bulldogs next shot in attack didn’t result in points, but it was well constructed and highlights the potential of their new-look halves combination.
Take notice of how the defence reacts when Burton plays on the ball at first receiver here:

His threat as a runner sits the Sharks on their heels as he straightens the attack. Wilton in particular sits very deep in the line, hedging his bets incase Burton bangs off his right foot. That indecision leaves a pocket of space for Flanagan when he receives the pass from his halfback, and Flanagan uses that space to dribble a lovely grubber in behind the line.
Moylan – who has a habit of shooting off his line to apply defensive pressure – is no chance of covering this kick. Talakai is at long odds to get there too as a bigger body not suited to turning and chasing. Flanagan intentionally targets the space in behind both Sharks defenders and nearly comes up with an assist for Averillo. Only a desperate cover tackle from Ronaldo Mulitalo denies the Bulldogs on this occasion.
Slotting Burton in at pivot continued to pay dividends when Declan Casey scored his second NRL try just before the break.
Again the Sharks defence is passive when Burton straightens the attack from first-receiver:

Burton’s involvement allows Flanagan to get on the outside of Wilton and isolate Jayden Okunbor one-on-one with Moylan on the edge. Okunbor’s timing is a little off here but he still wins the tackle to invite panic into Cronulla’s defensive line.
On the following tackle, Reed Mahoney almost capitalises on that panic to pass Ryan Sutton into half a hole beside the ruck:

A good tackle denies Sutton here, but with six Sharks defenders tied up around the ball there is space out wide on the following tackle. Burton makes the most of Sutton’s quick play-the-ball to almost crash over himself on the left edge.
Canterbury have now gone close to scoring in three consecutive tackles. Burton is out of play on the last but Perham identifies an opportunity down the short side and sums things up nicely with a cut-out pass to Casey on the paint.

And just like that, the Bulldogs pulled shape on both edges, moving Cronulla across the park and asking questions of the defence on consecutive tackles. Importantly, all four Bulldogs spine players had positive involvements in this set, chiming in and owning their moments to score one of the better constructed tries we saw in the NRL last week.
It’s interesting to note that Burton had one of his best running games while playing halfback in this one. His 98 running metres in Round 8 is his third-best haul of the season, and comfortably his best if you discount the long-range tries he scored in Rounds 3 and 6.
By playing on the ball at first-receiver, Burton had ample opportunities to challenge the line on the back of some ruck speed, eventually slicing through to put Waddell over in the second half.

We usually associate running halves with the five-eighth position, but Burton’s involvements at halfback in Round 8 went against that trend. He was invited into the game when slotting in at pivot, and whether by design or nature it also saw Flanagan and Perham get more involved in the attack, out wide.
They didn’t get the two points this week, but the potential of Ciraldo’s new-look halves pairing is there to see. Playing behind a depleted and beaten forward pack didn’t help their chances in Round 8, but it’s a move that could pay dividends when Canterbury welcome back some troops to their forward rotation.
 

flamebouyant

Kennel Legend
Joined
Sep 27, 2016
Messages
10,088
Reaction score
14,939
I watched the game on replay, and allthough i didnt know the end result, i knew the score to be 24-14 at some point during the second half. This allowed me to watch without emotion, which made it easier to appreciate the good we did. If we had have held onto the ball when we were in good position, and not give the sharks piggy backs out of their end, we could have actually come very close in this one. Definitely a better effort then some have suggested.
 

Disposable Hero

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
May 13, 2006
Messages
3,426
Reaction score
4,478
Calling all Kennel Arm Chair coaching experts. Now is your time to pull this articke to pieces I call all of you to throw logic out the window only usinv your emotive side of the brain!!
 

GrogDog

bad attitude
Joined
Jun 28, 2009
Messages
9,398
Reaction score
10,139
It was just yet another game that was winnable but we just throw games away. This time it was pretty much that we couldn't hold onto the ball.

The halves swapping around etc is just us waiting for CC to admit that Flanno and several other players shouldn't be in the team at all. While we wait for him to realise/have the balls to do something about it we can slowly see this season evaporate like we have in the many seasons before.

CC's team selections and bench use is ordinary. Very Tbaz like. IF we have to have Reynolds in the team why does old mate wait until the game is lost to put him on? Last week was a great example of that.

Waiting.......................................
 

bradyk

Kennel Immortal
Premium Member
2 x NF H2H Champ
NF Top Scorer
Joined
Mar 24, 2019
Messages
15,924
Reaction score
19,191
It was just yet another game that was winnable but we just throw games away. This time it was pretty much that we couldn't hold onto the ball.

The halves swapping around etc is just us waiting for CC to admit that Flanno and several other players shouldn't be in the team at all. While we wait for him to realise/have the balls to do something about it we can slowly see this season evaporate like we have in the many seasons before.

CC's team selections and bench use is ordinary. Very Tbaz like. IF we have to have Reynolds in the team why does old mate wait until the game is lost to put him on? Last week was a great example of that.

Waiting.......................................
Fans setting the bar very low. We're contenders for the worst team in the competition this year (again). I would argue Tiger have had 2 performances better than us. If fans think Tiger are worse, fair, but 2nd worst not much better is it. All our wins have asterisks. It's mainly a cattle/selection problem tho.
 

King Gus

Kennel Addict
Joined
Jul 18, 2021
Messages
5,721
Reaction score
10,173
It was just yet another game that was winnable but we just throw games away. This time it was pretty much that we couldn't hold onto the ball.

The halves swapping around etc is just us waiting for CC to admit that Flanno and several other players shouldn't be in the team at all. While we wait for him to realise/have the balls to do something about it we can slowly see this season evaporate like we have in the many seasons before.

CC's team selections and bench use is ordinary. Very Tbaz like. IF we have to have Reynolds in the team why does old mate wait until the game is lost to put him on? Last week was a great example of that.

Waiting.......................................
I said it before Burton at 7 means he is first receiver which mean he can take the line on and throw a pas out to flano or a forward running into a hole.
 

B-Train

Kennel Immortal
Joined
Mar 1, 2004
Messages
32,832
Reaction score
49,120
Fans setting the bar very low. We're contenders for the worst team in the competition this year (again). I would argue Tiger have had 2 performances better than us. If fans think Tiger are worse, fair, but 2nd worst not much better is it. All our wins have asterisks. It's mainly a cattle/selection problem tho.
A win against Melbourne in Melbourne never has an asterisk. They still had Grant, Hughes and Co, just no Munster and Pap who hasn't played all season. Why is there an asterisk for the Tigers and Cowboys wins?

Using that logic do our losses have asterisks on them too? Should the Warriors game have an asterisk because we got ripped off with a horrible call right at the end? Or other losses because we were missing half of our squad?

No wins or losses have an asterisk. That's why they play the game and keep score, to determine a winner and loser.
 

bradyk

Kennel Immortal
Premium Member
2 x NF H2H Champ
NF Top Scorer
Joined
Mar 24, 2019
Messages
15,924
Reaction score
19,191
A win against Melbourne in Melbourne never has an asterisk. They still had Grant, Hughes and Co, just no Munster and Pap who hasn't played all season. Why is there an asterisk for the Tigers and Cowboys wins?

Using that logic do our losses have asterisks on them too? Should the Warriors game have an asterisk because we got ripped off with a horrible call right at the end? Or other losses because we were missing half of our squad?

No wins or losses have an asterisk. That's why they play the game and keep score, to determine a winner and loser.
Only looking at who got the W or L is very small minded.

Storm missing Papenhuyzen, Olam, Coates, Munster, NAS went off early in 2nd stint, Kamikamica and other benchies. They were also massively out of form and obviously they aren't going to stay at that level (and haven't).

Cowboy missing Drinkwater, Tualagi, Cotter, Nanai and Leilua. Also massively out of form and most would assume they're going to be a much better team in a couple of months than they're now. We also didn't play well this game and almost threw the game. The last minutes of the game made it look better than it was.

Tiger win was bittersweet due to the 2nd half. We almost lost an impossible game to lose in front of a sold out Belmore and 99% of the fans being dogs (Tiger are the worst team in the competition).

We literally haven't had a good win yet. If fans are happy with what they're seeing not much has changed from last year. Eyes need to start opening, we're back to looking towards next year signings.
 

dogwhisperer

Kennel Addict
Joined
Sep 5, 2016
Messages
7,319
Reaction score
14,299
A win against Melbourne in Melbourne never has an asterisk. They still had Grant, Hughes and Co, just no Munster and Pap who hasn't played all season. Why is there an asterisk for the Tigers and Cowboys wins?

Using that logic do our losses have asterisks on them too? Should the Warriors game have an asterisk because we got ripped off with a horrible call right at the end? Or other losses because we were missing half of our squad?

No wins or losses have an asterisk. That's why they play the game and keep score, to determine a winner and loser.
I wish there was a button that gives two likes instead of one. Another great post.

You can actually tell on TK the ones who know their shit from the ones that have no freakin idea.

Keep ‘em coming brother
 

B-Train

Kennel Immortal
Joined
Mar 1, 2004
Messages
32,832
Reaction score
49,120
Only looking at who got the W or L is very small minded.

Storm missing Papenhuyzen, Olam, Coates, Munster, NAS went off early in 2nd stint, Kamikamica and other benchies. They were also massively out of form and obviously they aren't going to stay at that level (and haven't).

Cowboy missing Drinkwater, Tualagi, Cotter, Nanai and Leilua. Also massively out of form and most would assume they're going to be a much better team in a couple of months than they're now. We also didn't play well this game and almost threw the game. The last minutes of the game made it look better than it was.

Tiger win was bittersweet due to the 2nd half. We almost lost an impossible game to lose in front of a sold out Belmore and 99% of the fans being dogs (Tiger are the worst team in the competition).

We literally haven't had a good win yet. If fans are happy with what they're seeing not much has changed from last year. Eyes need to start opening, we're back to looking towards next year signings.
How many times had we won against Melbourne anywhere or in Melbourne before this year? Their team was still much better on paper and in real life than our team.

We had more players out against the Cowboys than they did. The Tigers game we dominated them early and relaxed to let them back in the game but still won. We weren't winning games like that last year. Nor with the Cowboys or Storm game. That's an improvement.

No one is saying we're perfect or are even a finals team right now but to say our wins don't count is absurd. Obviously we have a lot to improve on and still have a lot of issues. Doesn't mean there aren't positives in an injury riddled season so far.
 

dogwhisperer

Kennel Addict
Joined
Sep 5, 2016
Messages
7,319
Reaction score
14,299
How many times had we won against Melbourne anywhere or in Melbourne before this year? Their team was still much better on paper and in real life than our team.

We had more players out against the Cowboys than they did. The Tigers game we dominated them early and relaxed to let them back in the game but still won. We weren't winning games like that last year. Nor with the Cowboys or Storm game. That's an improvement.

No one is saying we're perfect or are even a finals team right now but to say our wins don't count is absurd. Obviously we have a lot to improve on and still have a lot of issues. Doesn't mean there aren't positives in a injury riddled season so far.
You know B-Train, sometimes people choose to be half glass empty instead of half glass full people and that is fine, they have to live with being like that. If people can’t see just how much we have improved this year considering we’ve been forced to use more players to play FG from our top 30 compared to any other team this year.

The funniest are those who have written us off already but there is only 2 points separating team 8th and team 16th atm, and it’s only round 8.

Let’s be realistic, we were never going to win against Parra,Souths and the Sharks with 7 players missing from our strongest 17 line up.
 

Aristidiz

Bullwog
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
3,069
Reaction score
2,614
Good analysis by OP but defences will quickly change to address this style of attack as Burton doesn't have a good long pass both ways. It also makes us heavily reliant on Flanagan and Perham to take advtantage of opportunities. Basically, it makes us too heavily reliant on Flanagan and Perham to be attacking sparks.

Good short term change but it wasn't enough to make up for our defensive lapses on the edges against the Sharkies.
 
Top