BULLDOGS 2009/2010 Player Contracts, Signings & Rumour Mill

N/A

  • N/A

    Votes: 71 68.9%
  • N/A

    Votes: 32 31.1%

  • Total voters
    103
Status
Not open for further replies.

Bulldogs09

Kennel Immortal
Premium Member
SC Draft Champion
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
15,286
Reaction score
13,305
Umm, because Paea is a front rower?:whacky:
and because i can see him taking the number 1 bench spot for a prop.

he is capable of some real destructive running and hitting. i think he will be a great addition. hannant and hodgson for 2010. then paea, armit and hickey as 2 that will join the bench of eastwood and gordon if they are kept.

and if hodgson moves on after 2010 hickey will be off contract and either replaced by someone of hannants calibre or hickey most likely starting with hannant and paea as our x factor. i really have wraps on him!
 

Bulldogs09

Kennel Immortal
Premium Member
SC Draft Champion
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
15,286
Reaction score
13,305
No, that's Lopini from the Roosters. Mickey, from the Dragons, is a second rower. :whacky: :p

Lopini is a good player and I reckon will kill it next year at the Roosters under Smith as will plenty of others like Sa etc.


mate mickey is too. well he was.
 

B-Train

Kennel Immortal
Joined
Mar 1, 2004
Messages
32,939
Reaction score
49,444
mate mickey is too. well he was.
Yeah played prop at the Roosters and can play there still but he's trimmed down alot and plays exclusively as a second rower these days. He doesn't have the bulk of Lopini and has played second row for Saints all year when he has played.
 

Bulldogs09

Kennel Immortal
Premium Member
SC Draft Champion
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
15,286
Reaction score
13,305
lol he isnt gonna get a start over weyman, poore or hunt (they really use this guy as there main bench prop) also have a few other handy props in saffy etc.
 

B-Train

Kennel Immortal
Joined
Mar 1, 2004
Messages
32,939
Reaction score
49,444
lol he isnt gonna get a start over weyman, poore or hunt (they really use this guy as there main bench prop) also have a few other handy props in saffy etc.
Well considering Weyman has been injured and been on Origin duty, likewise Poore and Saffy has missed some games there would be plenty of opportunity for him to play prop but he still played in the second row even though they have Prior, Costigan, Scott, Creagh, Young, Smith and others and guys like Jon Green got a start at prop instead. So what does that say to you? Aside from the fact that if you watch the Saints games he's played he's clearly played wider of the ruck, is listed as a second rower and commonly known as a second rower and he's only 100kg just reinforcing what I was saying before.
 

Bulldogs09

Kennel Immortal
Premium Member
SC Draft Champion
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
15,286
Reaction score
13,305
only 100kg? what is hodgson? he is 102kg not a huge diff

as for your backrow comments creagh, costigan have been on origin along with j smith out for along time. young at hooker. prior out etc. fact is they had dan hunt ahead of him. theres been alot of wraps on green and if he would be picked over paea or not is not questionable because paea has been out injured for a few weeks now and also this green has played well enough to keep his spot one would think. mickey is a much bigger unit then lopini and lopini is 2kg heavier. hardly a huge difference. how you use paea is not the point anyway. we all know that if eastwood and gordon stay paea would be playing a prop role.
 

B-Train

Kennel Immortal
Joined
Mar 1, 2004
Messages
32,939
Reaction score
49,444
only 100kg? what is hodgson? he is 102kg not a huge diff

as for your backrow comments creagh, costigan have been on origin along with j smith out for along time. young at hooker. prior out etc. fact is they had dan hunt ahead of him. theres been alot of wraps on green and if he would be picked over paea or not is not questionable because paea has been out injured for a few weeks now and also this green has played well enough to keep his spot one would think. mickey is a much bigger unit then lopini and lopini is 2kg heavier. hardly a huge difference. how you use paea is not the point anyway. we all know that if eastwood and gordon stay paea would be playing a prop role.
Mate I'm not saying Mickey can't play prop, hasn't played prop or couldn't play prop if he came here. What I am saying is that he is more of a second rower and considered a second rower.

Obviously Moore likes second rowers who can play a bit of prop and he's done that with Eastwood. Who knows where he'll fit in?

The point is Hannant, Hodgson, Armit, Stagg, Ryan, Warburton, Eastwood, Gordon are certainly in front of him at this stage and with Hickey, Kite, Harrison and Te Maari still around and the first three still developing and more of them expected, and then youngsters like Taupau and Afu still at the club next year just how much of a role could Paea play and just how much is he needed? Could the money have been better spent elsewhere?

I guess you can never have too much depth but I would have preferred a specialist prop to have been signed instead because Lee T and Harrison are good enough backups outside our top 5 second rowers.

Anyway, he's a solid player and he'll be signed so hopefully he fits in well. Somewhere.
 

Bulldogs09

Kennel Immortal
Premium Member
SC Draft Champion
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
15,286
Reaction score
13,305
not fighting mate. i agree he wont get a look in for us in the backrow because obviously stagg, ryan, warburton, eastwood are there with gordon as utility. hannant and hodgson will stay starting i dare say so the 2 spots i see open are bench for 2 props. one being armit most likely. the next will probz depend on hickeys fitness. te maari will find it hard to break back in. dunno if the rumours with kite are true but if not i can see it as a battle of 3 between paea, hickey and kite for the last spot. obviously if injuries happen and they always do theres a extra spot. but in saying that i guess this will answer some questions next year. if hickey doesnt finally find form and fitness week in week out when he is off contract he would be unlikely to be retained. kite has a few more years to develop you would think and if not reaching his hype and potential im sure we will see someone big brought in to partner hannant with hodgson most likely moving on.
 

Sandra's Bollocks

Est. 1979
Joined
Feb 4, 2008
Messages
8,934
Reaction score
8,696
Its probably been said on here already but Dogs are "supposedly" interested in Kris Keating.

Inu was close to signing but their CEO said no to paying the remainder (50k) in addition to the 220k offered from the Dogs.

Mateo had requested a release from his contract but Osbourne denied it. "Apparently" he could well play for the Dogs after his contract finishes at the end of 2010.

But oh well, Ill believe it when I see it.
 

Bulldogs09

Kennel Immortal
Premium Member
SC Draft Champion
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
15,286
Reaction score
13,305
where u hear this gonads?
 

B-Train

Kennel Immortal
Joined
Mar 1, 2004
Messages
32,939
Reaction score
49,444
not fighting mate. i agree he wont get a look in for us in the backrow because obviously stagg, ryan, warburton, eastwood are there with gordon as utility. hannant and hodgson will stay starting i dare say so the 2 spots i see open are bench for 2 props. one being armit most likely. the next will probz depend on hickeys fitness. te maari will find it hard to break back in. dunno if the rumours with kite are true but if not i can see it as a battle of 3 between paea, hickey and kite for the last spot. obviously if injuries happen and they always do theres a extra spot. but in saying that i guess this will answer some questions next year. if hickey doesnt finally find form and fitness week in week out when he is off contract he would be unlikely to be retained. kite has a few more years to develop you would think and if not reaching his hype and potential im sure we will see someone big brought in to partner hannant with hodgson most likely moving on.
Yeah next year will be big for Hickey. If he doesn't have a big off season and finally shed his weight then he won't come close to reaching his potential and won't likely be re-signed.

As for Kite, I hope the rumours aren't true and still rate him massively as a prospect and think he has the potential to be one of the best props going around in later years.

Either way, this is the thing that pisses me off about the signing period being as it is during the season and not as it should be, after the season. We should all be solely focusing on this season and the 2009 team but because the signing period is the way it is, quite often we focus more on 2010 than we do on 2009. Which is absurd when you think about it especially when we have a great chance of winning it all this year.

But with the way the NRL have "structured" things, you can't not talk about signings for next year during the season.
 

Bulldogs09

Kennel Immortal
Premium Member
SC Draft Champion
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
15,286
Reaction score
13,305
lol. well lets hope that we get mateo.
 

frogdog

Kennel Participant
Joined
Oct 28, 2008
Messages
160
Reaction score
41
i would much rather paea over geddes and would take mateo over them both
 

Terry Mortimer

Kennel Established
Joined
Jul 6, 2005
Messages
517
Reaction score
0
Maybe you would be best to give a hint of where you get your information. This would maybe make people a bit more lenient if your comments prove incorrect.

E.G.
I've get my information from people working for the Bulldogs Club, and from 2 of the players in our side.

or

I get the information from just outside my intestines and before my bum cheeks.

It wouldn't put anyones job on the line, but would help strengthen your arguement should the info be wrong.


His contact is legit
 

will.i.am

Benchwarmer
Joined
Apr 9, 2007
Messages
7,098
Reaction score
11
People were bagging Buddy when we signed him up last year and he has been an underrated buy for us. Now people are saying re-sign him up now ffs

Have faith
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top