News Board anger as Bulldogs director fails to mention pub ownership

jof

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
2,704
Reaction score
8,826
Bulldogs football club director, John Ballesty, is facing a backlash from several of his fellow board members over his failure to tell them he co-owns a hotel with pub baron Arthur Laundy, who recently signed a deal to sponsor the team.
Eyebrows have been raised over the deal with one league commentator describing the three-year agreement as "probably the worst in the game" with no money paid this year and reportedly only $500,000 per year for the following two years.
Several board members are furious that they only learned of Mr Ballesty’s long-time business association with Mr Laundy after the Herald sent the board questions about his potential conflict of interest, several sources close to the board have revealed.

John Ballesty, a board member of both the league and football clubs, owns a multi-million dollar hotel with  pub baron Arthur Laundy.


John Ballesty, a board member of both the league and football clubs, owns a multi-million dollar hotel with pub baron Arthur Laundy.Credit:Paul Jones
Three of the seven board members - Bulldogs chair Lynne Anderson, Mr Ballesty and Paul Dunn – are currently trying to fend off a coup, with more than one hundred unhappy members singing a petition calling for an Extraordinary General Meeting to oust them.

The revelations are the latest drama to engulf the club after the recent move to stand down League Club president George Coorey following allegations of inappropriate behaviour revealed by the Herald.
On 23 July the Bulldogs board approved the deal for Laundy Hotels to be the major sponsor of the club until the end of 2022.

But what the majority of the board did not know was that Mr Ballesty and Mr Laundy each own a third of the Villawood Hotel. Land title records show they purchased the hotel in 2000 for $4.8 million.
According to corporate records, in 2012 Mr Ballesty, Mr Laundy and their third business partner, signed a $600,000 per year lease, subject to annual increases, with the Woolworths-backed ALH Group. The 25-year lease expires in 2037.

Previously, Mr Ballesty and Mr Laundy were directors and shareholders in a company Lonsdale Hotel Pty Ltd, which owned a hotel of the same name in South Australia, from 1994 to 2009.
When the Herald asked whether Mr Ballesty had notified the board of his association, a spokesman for the board replied that Mrs Anderson and CEO Andrew Hill were aware of the relationship when negotiating the deal and that Mr Ballesty was not a party to the negotiations.

The Villawood Hotel, co-owned by Bulldogs director John Ballesty.

The Villawood Hotel, co-owned by Bulldogs director John Ballesty.

In a second statement, it was admitted that the rest of the board had not been notified due to “the final approval process which occurred via email in an out of Board session” due to Covid-19 restrictions.
Mr Ballesty said that while he doesn’t consider he is conflicted in this matter, he acknowledged “that he preferentially would have advised the whole board,” a later statement read.

Mr Ballesty, who also sits on the League club board, said he disclosed his hotel ownership to that board in April 2018.
It is not suggested that Mr Ballesty personally gained from the sponsorship deal.
Mr Ballesty’s failure to inform the majority of the board of his business interest with a major sponsor has raised serious questions about Mr Ballesty’s continuation on the board, several sources close to the board said.
Mr Ballesty, 75, was the league club general manager during the 2002 Bulldogs salary cap scandal. In 2004 he admitted in a Sydney court that he knew about the salary cap rorts as early as 1999 but did nothing to stop them. He said club chairman Gary McIntyre assured him that the arrangement was legal.

"I should have checked," Mr Ballesty said at the time.

 

The__GM

Kennel Established
Joined
Feb 19, 2019
Messages
683
Reaction score
1,948
Who is signing off on these hit pieces?
When the Herald asked whether Mr Ballesty had notified the board of his association, a spokesman for the board replied that Mrs Anderson and CEO Andrew Hill were aware of the relationship when negotiating the deal and that Mr Ballesty was not a party to the negotiations. In a second statement, it was admitted that the rest of the board had not been notified due to “the final approval process which occurred via email in an out of Board session” due to Covid-19 restrictions. Mr Ballesty said that while he doesn’t consider he is conflicted in this matter, he acknowledged “that he preferentially would have advised the whole board,” a later statement read. Mr Ballesty, who also sits on the League club board, said he disclosed his hotel ownership to that board in April 2018. It is not suggested that Mr Ballesty personally gained from the sponsorship deal.
So he disclosed it back in 2018, wasn't involved in negotiations and did not benefit in any way from the arrangement.

I am fucking longing for the days where this fractured Bulldogs board finally buries whoever is creating all of this media bullshit so we can focus on the future of the club. It's such a shame that within the space of 24 hours we have the news of the future coaching team coming in, farewelling the players after a dour 2020, then having to deal with this bullshit on top.
 

Spoonman84

Kennel Immortal
Premium Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2013
Messages
17,736
Reaction score
31,795
For a successful club it should be around 2.5-3 times what Laundy paid from what i understand.

Clubs were achieving $500k in the early 2000's.
Either the story is fabricated or there is something else in the deal because there is no way any board should be signing off on a major sponsorship deal like this is one.
 

boggie23

Kennel Addict
Joined
Dec 20, 2004
Messages
7,272
Reaction score
5,111
Around the million mark. Even in our position $500k is pathetic.
Exactly. I don’t have a problem with ballesty being in bed with laundy. That is the role of directors (to use their knowledge and associates to line up deals).

the bigger issue is that 2.5 years of sponsorship will net 1 million dollars. We should be making that per season not for 3 seasons (all be it one was interrupted).
 

Malla

*********
Joined
Aug 30, 2007
Messages
10,870
Reaction score
13,470
Someone is on a real mission to fuck this club up
SMH - Kate McClymont

Looks like she has been tasked with writing dirt on the doggies as it's not the first she has written about us.

Anyway, easy to put the links together. All originates from Gus Gould's claims earlier this year - now it's almost like they are working to justify his comments lol.
 

Spoonman84

Kennel Immortal
Premium Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2013
Messages
17,736
Reaction score
31,795
Exactly. I don’t have a problem with ballesty being in bed with laundy. That is the role of directors (to use their knowledge and associates to line up deals).

the bigger issue is that 2.5 years of sponsorship will net 1 million dollars. We should be making that per season not for 3 seasons (all be it one was interrupted).
Yeah the Ballesty stuff is a non issue he probably should have told the whole board but he wasn’t involved in the negotiations.

If it’s true about the $500k it’s gross negligence on the board’s behalf. There has to be more to it because I can’t see why they would agree to it.
 

c-b-b

Kennel Addict
Premium Member
Gilded
Joined
Apr 23, 2014
Messages
7,386
Reaction score
12,689
Either the story is fabricated or there is something else in the deal because there is no way any board should be signing off on a major sponsorship deal like this is one.
I get we all love the club and hate bad things being written about it but I can't understand how people don't see the problem here,

You've got a person who has partial ownership in a business and wearing another hat sits on a board which is set to benefit from a sponsorship. Whos interests does he act in - his own business or the bulldogs.

Best thing in this case would be for every other director to be involved in the decision and he should have been excluded, that way there's no story.
 
Top