i don't really care whether we get the world cup or not, but i agree with lord almighty that it would require massive, massive investment in large stadiums. according to today's SMH, we need 12 venues across at least eight cities. ten of them need to be capacity 45000+, and two have to be capacity 80000+.
if we're right that FIFA wants rectangular stadiums, and won't accept cricket grounds: only sydney, brisbane, melbourne have rectangular stadiums at roughly 45000+, or at least they will if melb upgrades its new stadium. to get up to eight host cities, we then need to either build a big new stadium or substantially upgrade an existing stadium in perth, adelaide, hobart, darwin, canberra. (you could replace some of those with regional cities but the problem of building stadiums that are big enough remains). that only gives us nine stadiums, though - 2 in sydney, 1 in each of the other cities - so three cities would have to get a second major stadium. then, we only have one rectangular stadium with a capacity greater than 80000, so in addition to the above we would require a massive upgrade of either the SFS or suncorp.
so basically if we can't use cricket grounds we're totally ****ed over, cause i can't see the state govts putting up all that money to build and upgrade stadiums. especially since they'll be used for a month and then turn into worse white elephants than ANZ.