- Joined
- Aug 4, 2007
- Messages
- 9,048
- Reaction score
- 5,369
shuuuu lateeeersLet's be honest here, he is a shit player and he fucked up, he will be sacked.
We get rid of a shit player and it shows the club doesn't take shit and acts swiftly.
shuuuu lateeeersLet's be honest here, he is a shit player and he fucked up, he will be sacked.
We get rid of a shit player and it shows the club doesn't take shit and acts swiftly.
Todd Greenberg is a degenerate and hypocrite with no moral compass.
How can one weigh up what has happened in the off season and decide that this (two players having consensual sex with schoolgirls, which one met at a school) be worse than a player (Scott) bashing a police office (bonus points for being a woman).
This incident is in itself TOTALLY INNOCUOUS. If you feel as if this incident was worse than all the other incidents in the nrl off season, then you have a moral compass that contradicts itself (Greenberg).
I urge all Bulldogs Members and Kennel members to stand beside Okunbor and CHN, you may not like what they did (I personally think it will be hilarious in a few years time) but all should support them.
Reported.God some people are dumb... stop writing that shit on here ^^
wutPoor fella who has to break the news to the kid and his mother who is an employee of the club
Because if he asked an underage person for nudes, it's not just a discussion about morality any more. That is an illegal act.Why? how does some pictures on snapchat and some messages change what is already known?
Society is changing, and things like this are becoming less and less appropriate. Like it or not, its the way it is.
If you had $2mil to invest in advertising your business, would you seriously do it through this channel considering the media shitstorm??? Fuck no!!!!
While I am happy with the under 18 part, why doesn't the age of consent be 18 as well?Because if he asked an underage person for nudes, it's not just a discussion about morality any more. That is an illegal act.
Under the Australian law it is illegal to use your phone or internet to take, keep, look at, send, or ask someone to send sexual images or videos of anyone who is under 18 years of age (or anyone who looks under the age of 18). This law applies even if the photo or video is of yourself or if the person in the photo or video said it was OK. When sexting involves someone under 18 it can be considered child pornography.
https://www.getthefacts.health.wa.gov.au/keeping-safe/sexting
I'm a fan of Gould, though he couldn't stop this, just like the scandal he couldn't stop last year with Tyronne May.I tend to agree to some extent tho I don't farm off any direct responsibility from the 2 players.
Where does the buck stop?
The club needs to learn something from this as well. Clearly the players were not sufficiently intimidated by our rules of no women in rooms. How can they feel so brazen as to think they can walk through reception, escort a female to their room and later the female leaves via the corridor and reception. No official around that the player is even remotely worried will discover them? Surprised.
Not trying to expand the blame game here but a whole new re-set of procedures and accompanying fines/dismissal needs to be implemented.
I've suggested elsewhere, we are now in terrible territory and Gus Gould, someone who is universally recognised as a leader, needs to be brought in to thoroughly assess our club going forward.....if only as a positive public relations measure to give us some hope of clearing the club's name and reputation.
Difference here is that absolutely nothing happened at Coffs Harbour.I did the same during the Coffs Harbour shitstorm.
Is there a dick pick I missed? Or something else aside from the all too common nowadays sexting.Okunbor has to be sacked
https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/bu...-images-snapchats-reveal-20200312-p549b4.html
So rashays are puppets, or sheep? Come on bro, your kidding yourself.wrong im not a pupet or a sheep , see hell yeah i would .. id through 2 mil to the wind to help my beloved team !!
So the “it’s all legal” facade for Cocknbur is now finished. He’ll likely be a registered sex offender and charged. Hope it was worth it.Because if he asked an underage person for nudes, it's not just a discussion about morality any more. That is an illegal act.
Under the Australian law it is illegal to use your phone or internet to take, keep, look at, send, or ask someone to send sexual images or videos of anyone who is under 18 years of age (or anyone who looks under the age of 18). This law applies even if the photo or video is of yourself or if the person in the photo or video said it was OK. When sexting involves someone under 18 it can be considered child pornography.
https://www.getthefacts.health.wa.gov.au/keeping-safe/sexting
Missed the part where he asked an underaged girl for explicit pics? = sackedIs there a dick pick I missed? Or something else aside from the all too common nowadays sexting.
There's plenty of picks of shirtless NRL players, every recovery session at the beach for a start.
Go Dogs
Possibly. But look at the population boom over the past century, and the massive disparity that has come along with it. What would you otherwise expect??I think what's changed is that everybody wants to look like the hero, but in reality humans have gotten worse, I mean you only need to turn on prime time TV to see endless amounts of smut and filth, and then there is the shenanigans that teenagers of all ages get up to on platforms like Snapchat and Tik Tok
Yes, the two apparently grown men should have known better and should not even have contemplated what they did. Trips away in the future will be pretty crowded events; playing squad, one minder for each of them. Ultiomately though personal responsibilty is obviously lacking in a lot of footy players because they keep shooting themselves, the club and the game in the foot over and over.I tend to agree to some extent tho I don't farm off any direct responsibility from the 2 players.
Where does the buck stop?
The club needs to learn something from this as well. Clearly the players were not sufficiently intimidated by our rules of no women in rooms. How can they feel so brazen as to think they can walk through reception, escort a female to their room and later the female leaves via the corridor and reception. No official around that the player is even remotely worried will discover them? Surprised.
Not trying to expand the blame game here but a whole new re-set of procedures and accompanying fines/dismissal needs to be implemented.
I've suggested elsewhere, we are now in terrible territory and Gus Gould, someone who is universally recognised as a leader, needs to be brought in to thoroughly assess our club going forward.....if only as a positive public relations measure to give us some hope of clearing the club's name and reputation.