Alan79
Kennel Legend
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2007
- Messages
- 13,442
- Reaction score
- 19,671
Being pharmaceutical companies, they'll be measuring the potential profit from treatment before they think of creating a vaccine. A vaccine is a one off injection verse possibly a couple of bottles of treatment. It's not an analysis of how many lives can be saved, it's unfortunately about the dollars they can make. I've heard that medicinal marijuana has been opposed by big pharma companies because it's largely more useful as a pain treatment and less addictive when tobacco isn't involved (as it frequently is with recreational use). Makes me wonder if we could have cures for the bulk of cancers if big pharma didn't profit heavily from treatments and painkillers.They certainly will soon.
When SARS outbreak happened there was 30 pharmaceutical companies who each spent over $10 million developing a vaccine thinking that it would make a mint. Then the virus died back. Now those same companies are saying, "I'm not going to waste money developing a vaccine unless I know it's actually an issue"
The main problem now is that they know it's an issue but also know that it can be treated with drugs. So they'll develop a treatment first then a vaccine and they'll make a decent amount of money.
I'll be very surprised if the Australian death toll reaches close to 250k from the corona virus. Seems like it will be far easier to quarantine people and isolate it with our reduced population density.