- Joined
- Aug 1, 2012
- Messages
- 19,605
- Reaction score
- 16,670
It's a sad day for an alleged free and democratic society when a court can ban your right to protest.
Unskilled isn’t an insult. It is the correct term to use for a job that requires no formal education or qualifications.So... re the "Text message" issue.
We were given minimal time to respond, and the sentiment around train crew is in line with the 6% in favour of suspending the action.
Re unskilled. I hardly think that is true. We are uniquely skilled, our skills are not transferable to other vocations, and yet essential to our job functions and ensures public safety is front of mind.
What other actions do you have when you are being paid more than 20% than similarly skilled counterparts in other states?
Fair enough too.Unskilled isn’t an insult. It is the correct term to use for a job that requires no formal education or qualifications.
My wife is a postie. Great job. Good conditions. Unique skills acquired on the job. But still unskilled.
I earn about half what I used to earn when I worked in private enterprise. But I took the job for other reasons. I knew the salary and conditions going in and am not about to complain and ask for more now that They’ve invested time and money into training me.
Agreed.Fair enough too.
as a GROUP bargaining process, you are with a group of people who have just finished training all the way through to close to retirement, everyone is treated the same as part of the EBA, as such it isn't about their initial investment in you, but their ongoing one
Part of the liberal agenda as revealed after the last election was to destroy unions which in turn will remove the funding from their biggest opposition.It's a sad day for an alleged free and democratic society when a court can ban your right to protest.
Don't forget the royal commission that turned up with practically nothing.Part of the liberal agenda as revealed after the last election was to destroy unions which in turn will remove the funding from their biggest opposition.
Step 1 of that plan was to destroy the car manufacturing industry.
Step 2 was to run a big smear campaign through the media.
the stacking of the FWC seems to have taken longer. But if we look at things like the removal of weekend rates for hospitality workers and this action against rights that people have had for many years, you can see that they've done a fairly good job of undermining workers rights.
Things like this should be pointing out to anyone that has half a brain unlucky enough to be on low/medium incomes (basically the majority of Australians) that we need to start protesting about these things. But for some reason people seem to get the shits when they hear about others protesting for their rights. It's something like stockholm syndrome in my opinion.
I'm sure they knew it wouldn't. It did come with some big media coverage that would have turned a lot of people with no real opinion about unions into armchair critics who would swear that unions are all corrupt based on the initial suspicion generated.Don't forget the royal commission that turned up with practically nothing.
Agreed.
I’ve never been a fan of the EBA as a concept (the same framework applied in my workplace). There’s no incentive to be good employee. You’re paid as though you’re equal to the shittest employee.
It’s basically, “we agree you’re worth $150000, but if we give you that, we’d have to give that shitcunt the same.”
That’s true and I’ve got the bonus, the last 3 years in my group, But that’s a drop in a bucket to what I could earn ‘outside’ if I was commanding my own price.An EBA does not prevent companies from offering extra bonuses to exemplary workers or deny them the right to negotiate a better deal where the employee is willing to negotiate. It just improves the minimum for every worker and usually it isn't improved by a huge amount. In most cases these days the improvements are more likely to be similar to the cost of living rises
They knew there wasn't much to it but were also hoping something came out which would stick to Bill Shorten.I'm sure they knew it wouldn't. It did come with some big media coverage that would have turned a lot of people with no real opinion about unions into armchair critics who would swear that unions are all corrupt based on the initial suspicion generated.
It's hard to comprehend. But I've witnessed firsthand some of the arguments and the rubbish that businesses spread to convince their workers that unions are bad. I personally saw a manager come and tell people that the branch of a business I worked for was close to folding during an EBA negotiation, while in the paper about a week later they released their profit statement which proudly trumpeted a 60% rise in profits from that same branch by one of their higher level executives in the business pages of the Australian. I don't know how fair it is to say that people are far more gullible these days than they have proven to be in the past, but it appears to be a trend now to bury your head in the sand to better be able to ignore the fact that businesses will bend you over and have their way with you.They knew there wasn't much to it but were also hoping something came out which would stick to Bill Shorten.
It astounds me that there are workers out there who are against unions, they're working against their own interests FFS.
If you negotiate a better pay rate with your employer you aren't required to publicize that to every employee in the place. So thats a bit of a lie from your employer who it would seem just doesn't want to pay you any more. Thats part of a divide and conquer strategy to me and a fairly common tactic among the bag of tricks that businesses use frequently.That’s true and I’ve got the bonus, the last 3 years in my group, But that’s a drop in a bucket to what I could earn ‘outside’ if I was commanding my own price.
Even though, independent salaries are allowed in the EB, most organizations won’t (mine certainly won’t). As it can be seen as unfair to the shit workers.
I've never worked anywhere that has been able to keep employees salaries secret.If you negotiate a better pay rate with your employer you aren't required to publicize that to every employee in the place. So thats a bit of a lie from your employer who it would seem just doesn't want to pay you any more. Thats part of a divide and conquer strategy to me and a fairly common tactic among the bag of tricks that businesses use frequently.
I think ignorance, privilege and an "entitled" attitude comes into it as well.It's hard to comprehend. But I've witnessed firsthand some of the arguments and the rubbish that businesses spread to convince their workers that unions are bad. I personally saw a manager come and tell people that the branch of a business I worked for was close to folding during an EBA negotiation, while in the paper about a week later they released their profit statement which proudly trumpeted a 60% rise in profits from that same branch by one of their higher level executives in the business pages of the Australian. I don't know how fair it is to say that people are far more gullible these days than they have proven to be in the past, but it appears to be a trend now to bury your head in the sand to better be able to ignore the fact that businesses will bend you over and have their way with you.
It's against privacy laws to reveal employees wagesI've never worked anywhere that has been able to keep employees salaries secret.
Especially in a big place.
Yep. Accounts are pretty bad when it comes to that. It's actually illegal for them to reveal people's wages but they often let it slip.I've never worked anywhere that has been able to keep employees salaries secret.
Especially in a big place.
Its Government bullying gone mad, Fair work is a Government entity with Government interests, strike action is still not out of the question, if they stand as one, the war will be won.It's a sad day for an alleged free and democratic society when a court can ban your right to protest.
They don’t “reveal” them, it just leaks out. You’ve got admin staff, payroll staff, trusted colleagues, it just takes one conversation and before long everyone knows.It's against privacy laws to reveal employees wages