Additional team should come from south-east Queensland, clubs told

Status
Not open for further replies.

B-Train

Kennel Immortal
Joined
Mar 1, 2004
Messages
32,808
Reaction score
49,054
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...ast-queensland-clubs-told-20110725-1hx8v.html


Brad Walter
July 26, 2011 .


SOUTH-EAST Queensland appears likely to be home to a 17th NRL team after club bosses were told it was the only area where a new side would increase the value of the next television rights deal.

The news is a blow to the Central Coast Bears and other bid teams who are vying to enter the NRL when officials decide to expand.

However, the advice of Colin Smith, of LEK Consulting, who has been engaged by the NRL as a consultant on the next broadcast rights deal, is a boost for the hopes of the recently launched Brisbane Bombers and the Ipswich consortium.

Advertisement: Story continues below

The newly established independent commission, which is due to take over the running of the game from November 1, would be expected to call for applications from other interested bidders when and if they decide to expand the competition.

With officials having ruled out commencing formal negotiations for the new broadcast deal to start in 2013 until the commission comes to power, it is almost certain that no new team will be admitted before 2014 - and possibly not until 2017.

There is a view that Perth should be the first place the game expands to, as the two-hour time difference would enable a live match to be broadcast on the eastern seaboard at either 9.30pm Friday or Saturday or 6pm Sunday.

NRL officials outlined three scenarios for the next television deal, which ranged from $1 billion over five years to $1.4 billion. The amount of the salary cap and club grant would depend on the value of the television deal, with funding and player payments to increased to:

$1 billion TV deal:

- Salary cap: $5.1 billion

- Club grant: $5.6 million

$1.2 billion

- Cap $5.9 million

- Grant $6.45 million

$1.4 billion

- Cap: $6.6 million

- Grant: $7.2 million

Smith is understood to have told last Thursday's conference of NRL club chief executives and chairmen that the only new team broadcasters would pay more for in the next rights deal was one based in south-east Queensland.

Club bosses were told that television executives believed Queenslanders were ''peculiar'' in that they would support any Queensland team - the Broncos, the Cowboys or the Titans - but not teams from anywhere else.

That theory was the reason Channel Nine began televising two Friday night games several season ago - one involving a Queensland team that is broadcast live in Queensland each week.

However, officials want to scrap the second Friday night game and a number of alternative time slots were discussed at last week's meeting - including a return to a 3pm kick-off on Saturday afternoons.

From 2013, there could be Saturday games at 3pm, 5.30pm and 7.30pm.

Also under consideration is a 6pm Sunday match, which has had mixed success in AFL.

The Herald was told yesterday that all time slots were options when talks with the broadcasters officially kick off. However, the clubs insisted that they want fixed scheduling to be introduced from the 2013 season onwards and expect the negotiating team, which is yet to be decided, to enter discussions on that basis.

Monday night football is here to stay, and could be on free-to-air television for the first time in 2013 as it is attracts up to 400,000 viewers each week on Fox Sports.

Clubs expect to receive greater compensation from the next television deal for hosting games on Monday nights than they currently get.

Officials are considering selling games on Friday nights, Saturdays, Sundays and Monday nights to separate broadcasters.

State of Origin and Test football could also be sold separately to premiership matches and the finals series.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...-clubs-told-20110725-1hx8v.html#ixzz1T9qMDL9S
 

B-Train

Kennel Immortal
Joined
Mar 1, 2004
Messages
32,808
Reaction score
49,054
This has to be the biggest load of rubbish ever. How on earth could a Perth team not boost the value of the rights? You get live TV at later timeslots, more flexibility, exposure to one of Australia's biggest, richest and fastest growing cities as well as a more national game. How does that not boost the value of the rights and how does another team in QLD do so? Fans of the Broncos aren't going to watch games of the "Bombers".

If the NRL again neglect the chance to make the game somewhat national and only add another team whre it's alredy strong and a congested market, then I would just about give up caring whether clubs go broke and whether the game will ever grow because they would have shot themselves in the foot one too many times.
 

luke

Kennel Enthusiast
Premium Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2004
Messages
2,455
Reaction score
31
central coast need a team but not at the expense of another new area coming in, the nrl need to increase the grant for a team to re-locate there and add perth and another qld side
 

kimlo

ADMlN
Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
5,737
Reaction score
0
Another Brisbane team would be so incredibly stupid.


People in Brisbane either support the Broncos, hate the Broncos or support another team. The "Bombers" aren't going to gain many new fans, the rugby league fans in Brisbane already have a team to support.

If it HAD to be in SE QLD, then Ipswhich is a MUCH better choice then Brisbane.

Still thought I'm with Btrain on this, Perth is more important than the rest, you could have two live Friday night games every week, 2pm sunday games that are live at 4pm heading into the news, etc.
 

Parra_Power

Kennel Addict
Joined
Jan 26, 2007
Messages
7,729
Reaction score
0
I know this a typo in the article but imagine:

$1 billion TV deal:

- Salary cap: $5.1 billion

- Club grant: $5.6 million

$1.2 billion

- Cap $5.9 million

- Grant $6.45 million

$1.4 billion

- Cap: $6.6 million

- Grant: $7.2 million
:nervous:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top