I’m sorry but I would hate to have Phil Gould running my club. Ive heard him say over and over again that Penrith will win 6 premierships in a row. What about his club in 3 years time ? No other boss of a side would ever say that. His recruiting has been insipid. Next year you’ll have a bunch of utility players none of which are match winners. The only decent buy is Crichton. Why dosent Gould chase a decent half back. That position is crucial. Look at Brisbane for example. This year Canterbury broke records . None of which were good. Nearly 800 points conceded ! Conceding 20 points in 12 consecutive matches. Gould is a fraud
It's probably worthwhile reflecting on what "Gould" is and is not (at least in my opinion, for whatever that is worth; probably not a lot).
He is obviously polarising. People seem to love him or hate him; often depending on whether he's working for your club or not at the time. I am more towards the middle. I care what he can achieve for my club. His broader opinions are just his opinions. I can take them or leave them as I please.
He is a genius (I do believe this) BUT that genius is very situational. It does NOT mean everything he does is genius, or that he knows everything, or that his decision-making is infallible (or even that good, in certain areas, sometimes), or that his opinions are always correct.
His genius is in being able to structure and establish the foundations of an elite junior programme, and especially the requisite networks, that can be developed and then utilised by a club to ensure a steady flow of future talent that can be relied upon for years/decades to come. He is the unchallenged champ of doing this. And in a salary-cap-restricted competition, the effect and benefit of this is almost immeasurable.
He is also a master manipulator of the media (for better or worse, depending on your perspective, I suppose). He knows how "the game" is played and how to play it.
He can use both of these traits to good effect. Manipulating the media narrative to convince a leadership (a "board") to give him enough time to establish the foundations.
So what is he not?
He is not infallible (as I said before). I think his firm declarations that a player is this, or that, or isn't this, or isn't that are often wrong, or premature. He often mis-recruits, mis-selects (even though the coach does that, apparently), mis-culls, or mis-retains.
For every Preston, you'll get a Perham, Sutton, & Davey. His specialty is not in picking talent, but in flooding the selection process with enough potential talent that the diamonds emerge from the rough on their own.
A bit like not being able to pick the winner of the Melbourne Cup, but making sure he owns all of the runners.
He isn't a top-grade coach (anymore). And to be fair, I don't think he claims to be, or wants to be.
Even though he does some of the Head Coach stuff (or even most while we have a struggling rookie at the moment), that's not really what he's good at. Even his results of "picks" for head coach haven't really been top class over the last several decades - from flicking Graham Murray, to sacking Cleary, to appointing Hook, to sacking Hook, to tossing his toys from the cot when he wanted Bennett over a returning Cleary, and a myriad of similar decisions.
But hopefully, by the time those kinds of issues arise (as they inevitably seem to do) his foundations will be in place and future coaches (and administrators) will be grateful, even if they might forget who to thank for their "good fortune".
Too many cite Penrith "kicking on" after his departure, as if his departure was the cause and not the foundation he built before he left.
I don't think it would be unfair to describe Gould as a Flawed Genius.