AlzzBulldog
Kennel Legend
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2014
- Messages
- 8,542
- Reaction score
- 14,171
I dont care if you support pay or not, but the biggest indicator for me that pay just dosent have it, is the non existent structure in this team.
Discuss
Discuss
We don’t have a quality 6,7 or 9... of course it won’t be organised... worst spine in the comp by a country mileI dont care if you support pay or not, but the biggest indicator for me that pay just dosent have it, is the non existent structure in this team.
Discuss
This Wakeham really isn’t the messiah that this forum seems to think he is.Pay is so stubborn to pick cogger/lewis despite he has a natural half that shits on them both in wakeham but doesn’t seem intent on picking him
You’re showing your bias or misunderstanding of defence if you’re blaming Wakeham for that try.This Wakeham really isn’t messiah that this forum seems to think he is.
Seeing Sam Williams of all people go past him seemingly nonchalantly to score a try was also a bit concerning.
it sounds funny that jmk is spoken about as one of our attacking weapons.The attack is a work in progress.
2 of our best attacking weapons in Foran and DWZ are on the sidelines. Then you’ve also got Meaney and JMK who would be in our top 13 who also aren’t out there.
We fielded 20+ players today also, many of whom played various positions throughout the match. There’s naturally gonna be a bit of clunkiness with the attack, you saw this with the Raiders attack also.
On the bright side, the defence was superb and we kept some genuine attacking weapons very quiet throughout.
Very good hit out overall.
Are you sure about that? Maybe have another look.You’re showing your bias or misunderstanding of defence if you’re blaming Wakeham for that try.
Got no problem with Wakeham copping his medicine when he deserves it but he doesn’t in this case. Wakeham did well holding off and not coming in. CHN and a couple of others didn’t come across and were bunched around the posts.Are you sure about that? Maybe have another look.
Seems it okay to paste Cogger and Lewis all week for a defensive miss. How dare I bring up Wakehams
Again, have another look. CHN was 1 off the ruck and was marking the lead runner. Wakeham was responsible for his opposite number Williams and missed him.Got no problem with Wakeham copping his medicine when he deserves it but he doesn’t in this case. Wakeham did well holding off and not coming in. CHN and a couple of others didn’t come across and were bunched around the posts.
The try was coming regardless.. he just hedged his bets that Williams would pass.. the only thing he can be blamed for is not making the conversion from wider out.. besides the full back should of done a better job of directing troops on the line considering there were 4 markers..Again, have another look. CHN was 1 off the ruck and was marking the lead runner. Wakeham was responsible for his opposite number Williams and missed him.
You can’t see the winger in this shot for the Raiders and Wakeham only had a centre and winger next to him. There’s no way Wakehams responsible for Williams. He’s either got the 14 or Frawley depending on where the ball goes. That whole edge is shot because all those players are bunched at the posts.Again, have another look. CHN was 1 off the ruck and was marking the lead runner. Wakeham was responsible for his opposite number Williams and missed him.
Sounds to me like someone is doing some shit-canning.... Lol , but he just said during the week he didn't shit can wakeham...You can’t see the winger in this shot for the Raiders and Wakeham only had a centre and winger next to him. There’s no way Wakehams responsible for Williams. He’s either got the 14 or Frawley depending on where the ball goes. That whole edge is shot because all those players are bunched at the posts.
View attachment 13335
Im not sure how much footy you’ve played Spoonman but as a defender your foremost responsibility is to cover your opposite man. When the ball was played Wakeham was marking Williams. If they’ve got an extra man out wide then you’ve gotta make them earn it by going through the hands to find that extra man. Wakeham took his eyes off his man and his man went through and scored. Simple as that.You can’t see the winger in this shot for the Raiders and Wakeham only had a centre and winger next to him. There’s no way Wakehams responsible for Williams. He’s either got the 14 or Frawley depending on where the ball goes. That whole edge is shot because all those players are bunched at the posts.
View attachment 13335