Gay marriage plebiscite - Result YES to SSM

Should the law be changed to allow same-sex couples to marry?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Not Voting


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

CaptainJackson

Kennel Immortal
Gilded
Joined
Nov 28, 2016
Messages
16,739
Reaction score
21,025
And lose millions in the process? You're an idiot. They're boycotting the word Christmas and anything remotely Christian about it, but they know obviously people will still shop
Dumb fuck it's associated with Christmas. Don't get your snowflake nickers in a knot.

If they were boycotting they wouldn't sell any of it. They've even listed it as a CHRISTMAS tree on their website you sensitive bitch

Acknowledging they're fully aware they're still listed as Christmas trees on the internet website, so there goes your theory it's about who thesuppliers for big w are.

It's about in their actual reality real world stores lol.
Logic do you know what it is?

How on earth does that link prove ANYTHING about their supplier?

Do you seriously think big w actually produces the many different items on their store?
 

Realist90

Kennel Legend
Joined
Mar 30, 2014
Messages
13,949
Reaction score
3,262
Dumb fuck it's associated with Christmas. Don't get your snowflake nickers in a knot.

If they were boycotting they wouldn't sell any of it. They've even listed it as a CHRISTMAS tree on their website you sensitive bitch



Logic do you know what it is?

How on earth does that link prove ANYTHING about their supplier?

Do you seriously think big w actually produces the many different items on their store?
Well to me logic would say that you wouldn't call someone a snowflake when you're a snowflake. It would also tell me that if you read my second post you quoted, you'd see I clearly stated the suppliers of big w as per your theory that it wasn't directly big w who made the decision on the name of the trees.
 

Flanagun

Banned
In the Sin Bin
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
22,588
Reaction score
20,581
I'm not actually arguing that. I'm just saying I don't get the outrage over it. It's a Christmas tree everyone knows it's a Christmas tree.

If big w were "boycotting" Christmas then I'd expect they wouldn't stock up on Christmas trees, decorations, stars, angels, model stable senses , Santa clause etc
Yeah but honestly, I think if I were a Christian, the idea of a store wanting to cash in on Christmas without actually acknowledging what it is would anger me even more. Many Christians feel the holiday has become too commercialised as it is.

I can kinda understand that it pisses Christians off when done stores seek to capitalise financially on Christmas without acknowledging what it is.

Edit: I know Big W isn't the manufacturer, but you'd think it would have some say in the products it stocks. It may have been an oversight, but in all honesty, I think stores should tske more care Roth decisions like this. I remember s department store was found to be selling Australia: love it or leave t shirts and received a lot of criticism from the left. The store didn't manufacture the shirt, but somewhere down the line, a decision was made to stock and sell it.

I agree boycotting etc before the whole story is known is a bit rash, but I to understand why this sort of thing rubs Christians the wrong way.
 
Last edited:

Flanagun

Banned
In the Sin Bin
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
22,588
Reaction score
20,581
I Like how you've applied basic logic and haven't applied hypocrisy or double standards. You're able to still look at things objectively and see this is quite ridiculous. Especially if it's a Christmas tree then why the fuck not call it what it is lol.
Haha yeah well I do agree with you about this. And I'm sure after the scare, Woolworths group will be extra careful in assuring the Christmas products it stocks are properly labelled in future. It isn't worth the backlash I don't think....
 

Kaz

Kennel Immortal
Joined
Sep 25, 2006
Messages
19,145
Reaction score
12,080
I know what you mean, look if I was religious I wouldn't need any outside influences, it would mean something to me and me alone. If you get what I mean.
I get it.

You like using the word mean. :laughing:
 

CaptainJackson

Kennel Immortal
Gilded
Joined
Nov 28, 2016
Messages
16,739
Reaction score
21,025
Edit: I know Big W isn't the manufacturer, but you'd think it would have some say in the products it stocks. It may have been an oversight, but in all honesty, I think stores should tske more care Roth decisions like this. I remember s department store was found to be selling Australia: love it or leave t shirts and received a lot of criticism from the left. The store didn't manufacture the shirt, but somewhere down the line, a decision was made to stock and sell it.

I agree boycotting etc before the whole story is known is a bit rash, but I to understand why this sort of thing rubs Christians the wrong way.
I reckon it's an oversight personally. Procurement, sales especially for things like this come down to the price. They would have had a whole bunch of suppliers come to them and they chose the cheapest option. They've called them Christmas trees on their website which hardly suggest an ulterior motive.

Yeah but honestly, I think if I were a Christian, the idea of a store wanting to cash in on Christmas without actually acknowledging what it is would anger me even more. Many Christians feel the holiday has become too commercialised as it is.

I can kinda understand that it pisses Christians off when done stores seek to capitalise financially on Christmas without acknowledging what it is.
Maybe it's just me because growing up as a Muslim i never got the whole type of attention about eid that Christians get for Easter and Christmas (from the commercial perspective). We'd just celebrate ourselves. Hence why I don't see it as a big deal.

But the other untouched issue here is the undertones to it and why some are outraged so much

Screenshot_20170921-173050.png


When, As said above, it is very possible it was just an over sight. Which is why my initial reaction is to dismiss the outrage as ridiculous because too many people have used it for their own bigoted undertones


Especially when big w is going to be stocked with Christmas stuff, their staff wearing Santa hats, carols blaring from their speakers, open long hours for Christmas shopping etc etc
 

The DoggFather

ASSASSIN
Premium Member
Gilded
Site's Top Poster
Joined
Sep 2, 2012
Messages
108,934
Reaction score
122,722

CaptainJackson

Kennel Immortal
Gilded
Joined
Nov 28, 2016
Messages
16,739
Reaction score
21,025
Pretty simple tbh....

Is the city of Sydney allowed to ONLY promote one political candidate in an election? Can it ban one side of the election and back the other?
Not sure but I don't think they're allowed to promote anyone, That they run their own campaign with their own funds
 

CroydonDog

Kennel Immortal
Gilded
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
19,656
Reaction score
16,775
Pretty simple tbh....

Is the city of Sydney allowed to ONLY promote one political candidate in an election? Can it ban one side of the election and back the other?
Sorry mate, that's still not helping.

Are you relating the story to local council elections or the postal opinion poll?
 

The DoggFather

ASSASSIN
Premium Member
Gilded
Site's Top Poster
Joined
Sep 2, 2012
Messages
108,934
Reaction score
122,722
Not sure but I don't think they're allowed to promote anyone, That they run their own campaign with their own funds
So why have they got gay flags and vote yes all over the CBD but not one vote no ad anywhere?
 

CaptainJackson

Kennel Immortal
Gilded
Joined
Nov 28, 2016
Messages
16,739
Reaction score
21,025
So why have they got gay flags and vote yes all over the CBD but not one vote no ad anywhere?
Because the councillors have had a vote and decided to support SSM.

Your democratic right is to vote and voice your concerns to your councillors.
 

CaptainJackson

Kennel Immortal
Gilded
Joined
Nov 28, 2016
Messages
16,739
Reaction score
21,025
I work in the city and honestly I have not seen one advertisement or flag supporting either the yes or no side from Sydney city council
 

The DoggFather

ASSASSIN
Premium Member
Gilded
Site's Top Poster
Joined
Sep 2, 2012
Messages
108,934
Reaction score
122,722
Sorry mate, that's still not helping.

Are you relating the story to local council elections or the postal opinion poll?
No I'm linking it to the **** rash mayor and the gay flags and vote yes everyone but don't see vote no ad.

And the yes advertising is paid and endorsed by SCC. Which is conditioning the sheep to vote yes.

You are all smart men, I can't believe you don't understand what I am talking about and quite frankly, you choose not to answer me because it goes against you agendas of pointing the finger at the side you don't agree with.

You guys would be calling Sydney Germany if the council had vote no flags everywhere.

I just hate and sick of this fucking biased agenda driven bullshit in this fucked up society.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top