Those photos make it conclusive.
1000% agree inglis jumps into them to get the penalty he also cost inu 5 weeks, stewrat sweeps his legs if reynolds dosn't keep the move going he probably breaks his kneck.Reynolds just did what inglis has been doing all year. Good on him, love the bloke to death.
Lol!btw looking at it again im not too sure he did dive
stewart tripped him up and took his legs out and he flipped him over
Look at it very carefully. If Stewart doesn't sweep the leg with his own, Reynolds doesn't go over. The referees (God bless their infallible performance of late .... choke, splutter) are usually clear - if you have a hand between the attackers legs and lift you are going to get penalised.After watching the replay I dont think it was a dive at all. If you look closely you'll see Stewart use his leg to try and take Reynolds' standing leg from out under him. Seeing as Reynolds' other leg was already being held up how was he meant to stay standing?
The rapist's brother thought he was the karate kid lol
I expect this from the media. Couldn't believe what I heard last week when Reynolds was hit late after a clearing kick - his legs attacked while he was in the air, and the commentators claiming that it was a harsh penalty against the Cowboys.Lol at the media claiming our win was "controversial" because of Reynolds, no mention of the "controversial" try manly scored off a blatant rort with that drop out call.