BulldogStar
Kennel Addict
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2005
- Messages
- 6,153
- Reaction score
- 12
Definitly not penalty try.
Possibly sin bin worthy.
Aubusson is a grub
Possibly sin bin worthy.
Aubusson is a grub
If you're referring to 09 against parra, I think it was different circumstances. A penalty from half way after a poor kick off where they took the tap instead. I think ennis was involvedIt's kind of interesting that the refs are struggling so much with the quick tap. I remember Roberts made one in 08 (or maybe 09) and ran halfway up the field to score and it was allowed. If the refs could allow it then without any problems when there wasn't a focus on allowing it, can't see why they won't allow it now.
Ahh ok yeah I think it might've been a tap after a penalty. Was exciting none the less! He caught the opposition way off guard.If you're referring to 09 against parra, I think it was different circumstances. A penalty from half way after a poor kick off where they took the tap instead. I think ennis was involved
That was one of most pathetic call i have ever seen.I was more upset when the Roosters knocked on attempting an intercept and the ref said it was the Roosters ball because it was going to be a forward pass.
He then penalised the dogs when Andrew Ryan asked him to justify how he knew the pass was going forward?
NRFARL is what they should rename the league to
National
Rigged
For
Action
Rugby
League
lmfao...penalty try.
10 in the bin.
Grade 5 contrary conduct.
Since when did this place become a house of reason ???
:mmph:
Life ban?Penalty Try.
10 in the bin.
Grade 5 contrary conduct.
:
spot on slip.Nah, no way.
He could have maybe reached the ball to tap it back, but I'd say there was only a 3% chance that he would have scored if not hindered. Has to be pretty much 100% for it to be a penalty try.
Ah yes! That should be the second question.spot on slip.
he gifted us 2 points, which i may add we should have not taken. I hate when Ryan takes those shots, we had them on the ropes again and we let them off
Hodkinson's pass, right?! PLEASE tell me how they got the decision on it would have/went forward!As for the refs, they were terrible. There was also another pass called forward late in the game that was not at all forward. I think it was Bryson Goodwin receiving it. They did everything they could to allow the Roosters to win.
I think it was Lafai's pass to Goodwin they claimed went forwardHodkinson's pass, right?! PLEASE tell me how they got the decision on it would have/went forward!
Considering the ball would have probably only gone 10cm or so before it hit the Roosters player aswell.Hodkinson's pass, right?! PLEASE tell me how they got the decision on it would have/went forward!
That one? That was flat at worst, too!I think it was Lafai's pass to Goodwin they claimed went forward
And the fact he had to stretch out to knock the ball on, too.....Considering the ball would have probably only gone 10cm or so before it hit the Roosters player aswell.
That pretty much sums it up.I don't think there was a clear enough try scoring opportunity, but there was clear attempt to prevent a player from creating one.