News Jackson Topine takes Bulldogs to court

DinkumDog

Kennel Immortal
2 x Gilded
Joined
May 15, 2017
Messages
23,274
Reaction score
42,908
Topine was shopped to rival clubs weeks before $4m claim against Bulldogs

Jackson Topine’s lawyer lodged a $4 million claim against the Bulldogs that alleged his client was incapable of playing the sport less than three weeks after the young back-rower’s agent sent an email to all 17 NRL clubs spruiking his client as an off-contract player.

Topine on Wednesday commenced legal proceedings against the Bulldogs over an incident last year in which he alleges he was punished by head trainer Travis Touma for reporting late to training and was allegedly told to wrestle between 30 to 35 of his teammates.

The training session on July 18 last year has been described in Topine’s statement of claim as a “deprivation of liberty” and “unlawful corporal punishment”. It is claimed Topine suffered “psychiatric injury” and “physical and mental impairment” as a result.
Topine has not played since and documents filed to the Supreme Court allege he had “suffered ongoing incapacity to play the game, with such ongoing incapacity continuing as at the date of filing this statement of claim”. Touma was subsequently cleared of any wrongdoing by the club. Canterbury and Touma are yet to file defences in realtion to the proceedings.

Topine’s agent, Tyran Smith, sent an email to all 17 clubs on April 8 with a list of his off-contract players that included Topine. There is no suggestion Topine’s legal team knew about Smith’s email.
The email from Smith was sent less than three weeks before the statement of claim was lodged followed on from a similar email on December 19 last year that also included Topine as an available player. There is no suggestion Smith knew about the coming legal action.

He told the Herald Topine’s name had been included on a list of available players that was generated by his agency’s computer.
“This is a list which shows NRL players who were coming off contract in 2024,” Smith said. “It is a list generated by our system on an annual basis. Jackson’s name was on the list because our system noted him as coming off contract with the Bulldogs in 2024. In Jackson’s case the uncertainty of his long-term prognosis has meant he has been taken off the list.”

The email, which has been seen by the Herald, said: “Jackson Topine is known for his exceptional work ethic and attitude towards growth and success.
“As the recipient of the 2022 clubman of the year award at the Bulldogs, his approach to being part of the squad impressed his team through his enthusiasm, effort and positivity. In his limited number of first-grade appearances, he has shown an extremely high tackle efficiency (93.5% in 2023, 94.3% in 2022, and 97.2% in 2021), which is a reflection of his grit and high endurance.


“He represented the Maori All-Stars during 2021 in a 10-10 draw, and played in the 2022 NSW Cup grand final against the Penrith Panthers.”

The ceasing of payment

Topine’s statement of claim alleges that the contract of the former Australian Schoolboy was illegally terminated. Sources talking under the condition of anonymity to protect confidences told this masthead that Topine was paid for at least three months after refusing to return to training.
It is alleged he provided the club with several medical certificates to justify his absence but would not respond to calls from club officials who decided to stop paying him well after his sick leave entitlements had expired.

Before the Bulldogs stopped paying him, Topine’s agent was notified that the club would cease to make payments to him if he could not fulfil his contractual obligations. The club stopped paying Topine on October 31 – the end of the rugby league financial year. The NRL also approved his removal from the club’s salary cap.


Those close to Topine believed he had a 10- to 12-year NRL career ahead of him. Given the average NRL salary exceeds $400,000 – and considering his status as a junior representative star – they predict he could have earned more than $4 million.

Topine was on an annual salary of around $125,000 at the time of the incident in question, which occurred at Gracie Jiu Jitsu in Smeaton Grange, in south-west Sydney.

The statement of claim says Topine was made to wrestle 30 to 35 teammates. This masthead has been told under the condition of anonymity that the club’s internal investigation into the matter estimated he had been told to wrestle 24 players for a total of four minutes at approximately 10 second intervals per teammate. The session was not captured on video.

The sources said Topine turned up to training for the rest of the week and did not raise an issue with the treatment at the time.
This masthead has learned that the incident occurred in the same week as he was demoted from the NRL for defensive lapses (including four missed tackles) in a 44-24 loss against the Brisbane Broncos at Belmore on July 15.


Three days after the loss – on the same day as the wrestling incident in Smeaton Grange – Topine was named to play in the No.11 jersey for the Bulldogs against the Panthers that weekend. The next day he was told by Ciraldo that he would instead be the team’s 18th man. He hasn’t played in the NRL since.

And now we see some of the reasons why the Bulldog board voted unanimously to defend the action…
 

Old Man JB

Kennel Participant
Joined
Sep 26, 2021
Messages
351
Reaction score
742
Topine was shopped to rival clubs weeks before $4m claim against Bulldogs

Jackson Topine’s lawyer lodged a $4 million claim against the Bulldogs that alleged his client was incapable of playing the sport less than three weeks after the young back-rower’s agent sent an email to all 17 NRL clubs spruiking his client as an off-contract player.

Topine on Wednesday commenced legal proceedings against the Bulldogs over an incident last year in which he alleges he was punished by head trainer Travis Touma for reporting late to training and was allegedly told to wrestle between 30 to 35 of his teammates.

The training session on July 18 last year has been described in Topine’s statement of claim as a “deprivation of liberty” and “unlawful corporal punishment”. It is claimed Topine suffered “psychiatric injury” and “physical and mental impairment” as a result.
Topine has not played since and documents filed to the Supreme Court allege he had “suffered ongoing incapacity to play the game, with such ongoing incapacity continuing as at the date of filing this statement of claim”. Touma was subsequently cleared of any wrongdoing by the club. Canterbury and Touma are yet to file defences in realtion to the proceedings.

Topine’s agent, Tyran Smith, sent an email to all 17 clubs on April 8 with a list of his off-contract players that included Topine. There is no suggestion Topine’s legal team knew about Smith’s email.
The email from Smith was sent less than three weeks before the statement of claim was lodged followed on from a similar email on December 19 last year that also included Topine as an available player. There is no suggestion Smith knew about the coming legal action.

He told the Herald Topine’s name had been included on a list of available players that was generated by his agency’s computer.
“This is a list which shows NRL players who were coming off contract in 2024,” Smith said. “It is a list generated by our system on an annual basis. Jackson’s name was on the list because our system noted him as coming off contract with the Bulldogs in 2024. In Jackson’s case the uncertainty of his long-term prognosis has meant he has been taken off the list.”

The email, which has been seen by the Herald, said: “Jackson Topine is known for his exceptional work ethic and attitude towards growth and success.
“As the recipient of the 2022 clubman of the year award at the Bulldogs, his approach to being part of the squad impressed his team through his enthusiasm, effort and positivity. In his limited number of first-grade appearances, he has shown an extremely high tackle efficiency (93.5% in 2023, 94.3% in 2022, and 97.2% in 2021), which is a reflection of his grit and high endurance.


“He represented the Maori All-Stars during 2021 in a 10-10 draw, and played in the 2022 NSW Cup grand final against the Penrith Panthers.”

The ceasing of payment

Topine’s statement of claim alleges that the contract of the former Australian Schoolboy was illegally terminated. Sources talking under the condition of anonymity to protect confidences told this masthead that Topine was paid for at least three months after refusing to return to training.
It is alleged he provided the club with several medical certificates to justify his absence but would not respond to calls from club officials who decided to stop paying him well after his sick leave entitlements had expired.

Before the Bulldogs stopped paying him, Topine’s agent was notified that the club would cease to make payments to him if he could not fulfil his contractual obligations. The club stopped paying Topine on October 31 – the end of the rugby league financial year. The NRL also approved his removal from the club’s salary cap.


Those close to Topine believed he had a 10- to 12-year NRL career ahead of him. Given the average NRL salary exceeds $400,000 – and considering his status as a junior representative star – they predict he could have earned more than $4 million.

Topine was on an annual salary of around $125,000 at the time of the incident in question, which occurred at Gracie Jiu Jitsu in Smeaton Grange, in south-west Sydney.

The statement of claim says Topine was made to wrestle 30 to 35 teammates. This masthead has been told under the condition of anonymity that the club’s internal investigation into the matter estimated he had been told to wrestle 24 players for a total of four minutes at approximately 10 second intervals per teammate. The session was not captured on video.

The sources said Topine turned up to training for the rest of the week and did not raise an issue with the treatment at the time.
This masthead has learned that the incident occurred in the same week as he was demoted from the NRL for defensive lapses (including four missed tackles) in a 44-24 loss against the Brisbane Broncos at Belmore on July 15.


Three days after the loss – on the same day as the wrestling incident in Smeaton Grange – Topine was named to play in the No.11 jersey for the Bulldogs against the Panthers that weekend. The next day he was told by Ciraldo that he would instead be the team’s 18th man. He hasn’t played in the NRL since.

This certainly shines a new light on things. It appears that the kid had a problem coping with being dropped and together with the disciplinary wrestling felt humiliated. Mentally not suited for the ups and downs of NRL. Feel sorry for him but he needs to move on for his own sake.
 

Old Man JB

Kennel Participant
Joined
Sep 26, 2021
Messages
351
Reaction score
742
Not sure whether the words before the quote below belong to the scribbler or the shark, but public claims that this action will have a bigger knock on effect to me highlight the ambulance chasey nature of the claim:

Topine's lawyer Abdul Reslan said the lawsuit would have a big effect on the NRL. 'Appropriate protections need to be afforded to all workplaces, including within the contact sports domain’.

Anyone who knows any decent lawyer will know that they don’t make predictive statements like this - they stick to known facts and advise clients of precedents and things courts are ‘likely’ to do. They don’t however predict wider ramifications outside any given matter. So if those words belong to the Shark that’s pretty telling. If they belong to the scribbler than maybe less so.
I think that statement was designed to pressure the club into an out of court settlement.
 

B-Train

Kennel Immortal
Joined
Mar 1, 2004
Messages
32,938
Reaction score
49,438
And now we see some of the reasons why the Bulldog board voted unanimously to defend the action…
But we were told by Doogie that if a lawyer takes on the case, then that means it's legitimate. Because there's no such thing as a sleazy, opportunistic lawyer that wants to get easy money or free press by making outlandish claims.. Topine's legal team make Lionel Hutz look legitimate..
 

DinkumDog

Kennel Immortal
2 x Gilded
Joined
May 15, 2017
Messages
23,274
Reaction score
42,908
I think that statement was designed to pressure the club into an out of court settlement.
Which may well backfire. I still don’t think it will get to a final hearing but the talk of $4m when Topine was on $125k in 2023 and likely not much more in 2024 (existing contract) and there’s no evidence any other club was interested in his services (word gets around, everyone knows each other in the NRL) shows that some have stars in their eyes…
 

Doogie

Kennel Lizard Lord
Joined
Oct 6, 2012
Messages
9,943
Reaction score
12,459
But we were told by Doogie that if a lawyer takes on the case, then that means it's legitimate. Because there's no such thing as a sleazy, opportunistic lawyer that wants to get easy money or free press by making outlandish claims.. Topine's legal team make Lionel Hutz look legitimate..
Nope. Fckd up again it seems. Any lawyer that present a statement of claim is legitimate until proven otherwise. Has anyone proven otherwise? Or you just like wanking off the little bits of media you get and making big outrage judgements.

Funny hey - if this was about the right to be a cross dressing kid to be called a frog at school - you'd probably have the same outrage. The same outrage that the people supporting the cross dressing frog would be throwing out. People who just like outrage are simple - its called woke.

Let the court hear it. Nothing there - then Topine is up for more cash. If theres something there, then the Dogs have to answer for it. And don't be a weak fck in the future - not that hard to tag someone in if you want to have your shot Mr. Wokey....
 

King Gus

Kennel Addict
Joined
Jul 18, 2021
Messages
5,928
Reaction score
10,616
Which may well backfire. I still don’t think it will get to a final hearing but the talk of $4m when Topine was on $125k in 2023 and likely not much more in 2024 (existing contract) and there’s no evidence any other club was interested in his services (word gets around, everyone knows each other in the NRL) shows that some have stars in their eyes…
If anything they should offer him 1.2 mill that’s 120k a year for 10 years and tell him to fuck off.
It’s starting to look like he fucked up big time and trying to cover his losses.
 

B-Train

Kennel Immortal
Joined
Mar 1, 2004
Messages
32,938
Reaction score
49,438
Nope. Fckd up again it seems. Any lawyer that present a statement of claim is legitimate until proven otherwise. Has anyone proven otherwise? Or you just like wanking off the little bits of media you get and making big outrage judgements.

Funny hey - if this was about the right to be a cross dressing kid to be called a frog at school - you'd probably have the same outrage. The same outrage that the people supporting the cross dressing frog would be throwing out. People who just like outrage are simple - its called woke.

Let the court hear it. Nothing there - then Topine is up for more cash. If theres something there, then the Dogs have to answer for it. And don't be a weak fck in the future - not that hard to tag someone in if you want to have your shot Mr. Wokey....
Whatever you say champ. More facts get presented which poke more holes in Topine's already weak case. You can ignore them if you want.
 

wendog33

Kennel Immortal
Premium Member
Ladder Champion
Joined
Aug 6, 2016
Messages
25,994
Reaction score
29,772
Before the Bulldogs stopped paying him, Topine’s agent was notified that the club would cease to make payments to him if he could not fulfil his contractual obligations. The club stopped paying Topine on October 31 – the end of the rugby league financial year. The NRL also approved his removal from the club’s salary cap.

Smith, as his Manager, doesn't appear to have much input, or control, of JT's best interests or seem to know what was going on.

Gets notification of the Bulldogs terminating the contract bc JT won't get in contact yet then sends out a memo to other clubs saying JT is available to negotiate.

Court case will unravel how much Smith did to actively try and mediate this for his client to bring both parties together. Doesn't look like much from what we know (as yet). What we do know is that Bulldogs initiated several attempts to remediate and meet with JT and "get both parties moving forward".

We also know NRL given the details by the club and are involved by approving the removal of his contract.
 

Doogie

Kennel Lizard Lord
Joined
Oct 6, 2012
Messages
9,943
Reaction score
12,459
Whatever you say champ. More facts get presented which poke more holes in Topine's already weak case. You can ignore them if you want.
Like the shopping around Mr. wokey from the anonymous source? Well his manager said it was an autogenerated email from his player contract system. And Tyran Smith put his name to this - not 'anonymous source'. That is directly testable in court, unlike anonymous sources....

Said it all along - let the courts decide. Better than letting Mr. Wokey decide.
 

DinkumDog

Kennel Immortal
2 x Gilded
Joined
May 15, 2017
Messages
23,274
Reaction score
42,908
If anything they should offer him 1.2 mill that’s 120k a year for 10 years and tell him to fuck off.
It’s starting to look like he fucked up big time and trying to cover his losses.
Generous. With no evidence that any other club was serious about signing him when flagged as off contract and now with the action commended plus learning he was paid for 3 months after going ‘on leave’ (well in excess of leave entitlements) that doesn’t make you an attractive proposition. There’s no guarantee he would’ve had a 10 year career or even @ $400k per annum - the average NRL career is shorter than that. Without knowing all the facts which are yet to be tested I’d suggest any settlement outcome is a fair way south of $1m and that doesn’t include costs either.
 

King Gus

Kennel Addict
Joined
Jul 18, 2021
Messages
5,928
Reaction score
10,616
Generous. With no evidence that any other club was serious about signing him when flagged as off contract and now with the action commended plus learning he was paid for 3 months after going ‘on leave’ (well in excess of leave entitlements) that doesn’t make you an attractive proposition. There’s no guarantee he would’ve had a 10 year career or even @ $400k per annum - the average NRL career is shorter than that. Without knowing all the facts which are yet to be tested I’d suggest any settlement outcome is a fair way south of $1m and that doesn’t include costs either.
100% just want this shit over with.
 

D0GMATIC

Kennel Legend
Joined
Nov 1, 2020
Messages
12,403
Reaction score
14,175
Before the Bulldogs stopped paying him, Topine’s agent was notified that the club would cease to make payments to him if he could not fulfil his contractual obligations. The club stopped paying Topine on October 31 – the end of the rugby league financial year. The NRL also approved his removal from the club’s salary cap.

Smith, as his Manager, doesn't appear to have much input, or control, of JT's best interests or seem to know what was going on.

Gets notification of the Bulldogs terminating the contract bc JT won't get in contact yet then sends out a memo to other clubs saying JT is available to negotiate.

Court case will unravel how much Smith did to actively try and mediate this for his client to bring both parties together. Doesn't look like much from what we know (as yet). What we do know is that Bulldogs initiated several attempts to remediate and meet with JT and "get both parties moving forward".
It's unravelling now, if it makes it to court, the judge will see that topines decision making process,from the time he was late,onwards has lead to his loss of career. The agent sending out his name as an available player, 3 weeks prior to topine lodging the claim,is a bad,bad look and will not be easy to explain away. Our lawyers will be all over that.
 

wendog33

Kennel Immortal
Premium Member
Ladder Champion
Joined
Aug 6, 2016
Messages
25,994
Reaction score
29,772
bro security clearances are done before you join ANSTO not after.

There were 3 levels of security clearances from ASIO spending on where you are working on site.
Seems like there's a mole leaking inside, sensitive top secret info ID.
Better hand that info on to ASIO. Tell 'em a big clue is to look for the guy with radioactive warts ;)
 

DinkumDog

Kennel Immortal
2 x Gilded
Joined
May 15, 2017
Messages
23,274
Reaction score
42,908
100% just want this shit over with.
Yeah the club could do without the distraction.
That said it will be handled by the executive and I doubt Ciro will let it distract the playing group - doubly so since many of them weren’t even here last year and may have little to no personal relationship with Topine.
 

dekepefc

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Jun 18, 2008
Messages
2,292
Reaction score
3,852
Generous. With no evidence that any other club was serious about signing him when flagged as off contract and now with the action commended plus learning he was paid for 3 months after going ‘on leave’ (well in excess of leave entitlements) that doesn’t make you an attractive proposition. There’s no guarantee he would’ve had a 10 year career or even @ $400k per annum - the average NRL career is shorter than that. Without knowing all the facts which are yet to be tested I’d suggest any settlement outcome is a fair way south of $1m and that doesn’t include costs either.
Things don't look good for his claim when you're a fringe player on arguably the worst roster in the nrl. Why not just go to another club if you're unhappy with bulldogs.. there wasn't anything other than himself stopping that.
 

dekepefc

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Jun 18, 2008
Messages
2,292
Reaction score
3,852
Yeah the club could do without the distraction.
That said it will be handled by the executive and I doubt Ciro will let it distract the playing group - doubly so since many of them weren’t even here last year and may have little to no personal relationship with Topine.
I don't reckon it will negatively effect the playing group.. if anything it may help them.. but more likely it has no impact at all.
 
Top