RookieDog
Dogs1
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2009
- Messages
- 1,557
- Reaction score
- 1,745
Raiders would have gone close to hitting 50 but for a couple of disallowed tries.After the opening set I honestly thought 50’ on the cards
So in a way, you were correct.
Raiders would have gone close to hitting 50 but for a couple of disallowed tries.After the opening set I honestly thought 50’ on the cards
I meant 50’ to nilRaiders would have gone close to hitting 50 but for a couple of disallowed tries.
So in a way, you were correct.
Yeah I know - I was more saying we leaked a hell of a lot of points.I meant 50’ to nil
Yes attack has improved, but his defence is very ordinary.......at least flanagan tackled.........you can't have 2 halves playing together if the are both poor in defence.....Obviously the positional change only coame about because Flanno failed to fire - but curious to hear people’s thoughts on whether it’s worth persisting with beyond this season? Our attack looks good with him in the 7.
Was at the game and Raider had a lot of space outwide when a quick play the ball was being shifted. Perfect opportunity for a step into that space and a palm on a shitty defender and bang try but he often went with the kick first thing. It might of worked a fair bit last night with the kicking but he even himself forgets when to run and not to runWe could of used his running game, but it looked like he shelved it after the Dragqueens game, for some stupid reason.
His running game is more dangerous than his big bomb that works once out of every 20 kicks.
Runs at the wrong time and passes when he should run way too oftenWe could of used his running game, but it looked like he shelved it after the Dragqueens game, for some stupid reason.
His running game is more dangerous than his big bomb that works once out of every 20 kicks.