U.S. Politics - Thread

U.S. Politics

  • Total voters
    103
Status
Not open for further replies.
Realist90 said:
People do do it though.
Anyways say what you’s want about me I’m very open with my opinions and beliefs, just don’t put me in the same basket of Q people who now think trump is actually Biden and it’s all part of some plan.
Click to expand...
Two wrongs don’t make a right though, right?
I don’t think anyone can excuse perjury by saying ‘I’m not the first to do it!’.

I’m not lumping you in with Q crazies.
You’re a staunch conservative and that’s fine.
I might not agree with much of that but respect your entitlement to it. But I’m still waiting for answers to some questions of earlier posts - in particular how do you explain the protection of life when the GOP then refuse to implement sensible gun control?
 
DinkumDog said:
Two wrongs don’t make a right though, right?
I don’t think anyone can excuse perjury by saying ‘I’m not the first to do it!’.

I’m not lumping you in with Q crazies.
You’re a staunch conservative and that’s fine.
I might not agree with much of that but respect your entitlement to it. But I’m still waiting for answers to some questions of earlier posts - in particular how do you explain the protection of life when the GOP then refuse to implement sensible gun control?
Click to expand...
I have not forgotten about that dw lol.
 
When you think about it, a 25-year-old woman has more courage and integrity than the entire republican party put together!
(And probably the democrats and the DOJ as well.)
 
Realist90 said:
So what if she’s “republican” mitt Romney a “republican” too, are you saying when a dem calls out another dem for something it is true? I’m guessing the stories about Biden being racist by kamala Harris in the dem debates they must be true right?
Ffs before jumping the gun wait for the investigation to finish instead of judging based on hearsay’s lol.
Click to expand...

You're using "hearsay" wrong. It would be hearsay if she said that someone else said that Trump said these things. As she was there to hear him, then it's not hearsay. It's her testimony of events.

And I did say that it needs to be corroborated and is only a small part of the evidence. Maybe wait to the end of the trial before you start ranting about how Hero Trump definitely did nothing wrong and instead just listen to the very publicly available evidence.
 
Grunthos said:
When you think about it, a 25-year-old woman has more courage and integrity than the entire republican party put together!
(And probably the democrats and the DOJ as well.)
Click to expand...

Yep. She has basically painted a target on her own back for life. And apparently she's doing it because she has an Axe to grind...
 
Hacky McAxe said:
Yep. She has basically painted a target on her own back for life. And apparently she's doing it because she has an Axe to grind...
Click to expand...
Yes, possibly and her boss is in the frame as well so it might also be a case of who throws who under the bus first.
It's better to be thought of as a hero standing up for justice than just another gutles lackey of trump.
 
Realist90 said:
People do do it though.
Anyways say what you’s want about me I’m very open with my opinions and beliefs, just don’t put me in the same basket of Q people who now think trump is actually Biden and it’s all part of some plan.
Click to expand...
Biden’s a clone..you know that!
 
Did Donny throw dead horse at the wall?

205161FE-354B-424D-814D-F9107947E297.jpeg
 
Hacky McAxe said:
You're using "hearsay" wrong. It would be hearsay if she said that someone else said that Trump said these things. As she was there to hear him, then it's not hearsay. It's her testimony of events.

And I did say that it needs to be corroborated and is only a small part of the evidence. Maybe wait to the end of the trial before you start ranting about how Hero Trump definitely did nothing wrong and instead just listen to the very publicly available evidence.
Click to expand...
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1542340053413859334
 
Hacky McAxe said:
View attachment 55843
Click to expand...
With each decision they prove that they're only partaking in ideological decisions and absolutely nothing to do with the law itself.

With each decision they prove their hypocrisy and that they're plain scum

Wasn't every life important? But yet this decision here shows they actually don't give a stuff about lives, they're full of shit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top