Burgler
Kennel Participant
- Joined
- May 1, 2017
- Messages
- 453
- Reaction score
- 972
Looking at RFM time at dogs. He signed a few round into the 2016 season. We finished 7th that year and he played 14 games. He’s played 100 odd games in 8 seasons. Which averages about 12 games a year. He was with the club the last season we made the finals. Outside of that he’s been in a team that finished 11th, 12th, 12th, 15th, 16th, 12th, 15th.
At the start of the season he was named club captain. He spoke about how much it means and how long he’s been at the club etc.
Then he gets injured, headlines around him being shopped around, then he’s reported to have gone back to NZ for some type of leave. He’s had pneumonia etc etc. Now he’s been named by Buzz to be complaining about training load.
Just seems to be drama after drama surrounding someone who is supposed to be a stable figure within the club. Did he think by being named club captain that he’s an ‘old boy’ now and exempt from the harder training? We won’t know but just doesn’t seem worth persisting with.
It’s a similar case with Topine. He’s been at the club a long time with very limited success, he’s been overlooked by 3-4 coaches during their tenures. Does he also think because he’s been there long enough he doesn’t have to prove himself like the new/up and coming players do.
Are these guys the problem at the club and when you look at the players let go or leaving such as TPJ, Nu Brown, Davey, Pele etc. The common theme seems to be inconsistent form or never cementing a spot. If the club can identify it and remove them rather than carry them for next few years, what’s the issue?
In regards to the player looking at legal action I thought training involved being pushed to your limit mentally and physically to give you an edge of the opposition. Boxers do that sharkbait type training all the time, is it a first for a player to take legal action against their club for training regime?
At the start of the season he was named club captain. He spoke about how much it means and how long he’s been at the club etc.
Then he gets injured, headlines around him being shopped around, then he’s reported to have gone back to NZ for some type of leave. He’s had pneumonia etc etc. Now he’s been named by Buzz to be complaining about training load.
Just seems to be drama after drama surrounding someone who is supposed to be a stable figure within the club. Did he think by being named club captain that he’s an ‘old boy’ now and exempt from the harder training? We won’t know but just doesn’t seem worth persisting with.
It’s a similar case with Topine. He’s been at the club a long time with very limited success, he’s been overlooked by 3-4 coaches during their tenures. Does he also think because he’s been there long enough he doesn’t have to prove himself like the new/up and coming players do.
Are these guys the problem at the club and when you look at the players let go or leaving such as TPJ, Nu Brown, Davey, Pele etc. The common theme seems to be inconsistent form or never cementing a spot. If the club can identify it and remove them rather than carry them for next few years, what’s the issue?
In regards to the player looking at legal action I thought training involved being pushed to your limit mentally and physically to give you an edge of the opposition. Boxers do that sharkbait type training all the time, is it a first for a player to take legal action against their club for training regime?