That's what one of the Russian sports minsters had to say.What a load of sh!t
There are black people already living in Russia.
black players*What a load of sh!t
There are black people already living in Russia.
.Argentine soccer denies report of pay-off
December 5, 2010 - 2:48PM
The president of the Argentine Football Association, Julio Grondona, on Saturday denied the association received a multimillion-dollar payment from Qatar to influence its vote for the 2022 World Cup host.
The denial followed a Wall Street Journal report on Friday that cited an unnamed former member of the Qatar bid team as saying that at least one adviser had recommended that the Qatar Football Association make a $US78.4 million ($80.5 million) dollar payment to help the Argentine association out of a finanacial crisis.
"There has to be an end to playing with my good name. Why on earth would the association have a debt of that size?" Grondona said in remarks carried on the Argentine newswire Telam.
Advertisement: Story continues below "I am not going to give any credence to whatever people may say," said Grondona. "The fact is the AFA has a solid contract with the Argentine government and it is all going quite well."
Grondona spoke from Zurich where the 22-member executive committee of FIFA, the ruling body of the international federation of football associations, on Thursday awarded Russia and Qatar the right to host the World Cup tournaments in 2018 and 2022 respectively.
AFP
http://www.smh.com.au/sport/soccer/argentine-soccer-denies-report-of-payoff-20101205-18l4b.html
You do realise that wherever it is held, at least one set of viewers is going to be forced to wake up to watch the games?
In counter to Australia's timezone being good for South America, you have to remember that having it in Australia would mean detrimenting European viewers. So quit skipping continents to try and favour one point as there is always going to be one timezone that is not favoured by the decision.
I had countered your point favouring Australia because of the Asian market by saying that Qatar is still able to tap that market thus meaning Australia does not have a sole advantage there. I also said it favours Europe.
You now say Qatar doesn't favour South America, but Australia does, but if Australia has it then it does not favour Europe, so it's a one for one thing. And then there's Africa which has a closer timezone to Europe and also closer to Qatar, so they tap that market as well with Qatar as the host.
Same point applies to Australia. Actually, it applies more so to AustraliaI also mentioned the fact that having it in a middle Eastern country appears to expand the game but still allows it to favour other continents.
This goes back to what I said above. You were the one who raised the point about Asia. I simply countered that by saying Qatar also taps that market. I then further added the fact that Europe is also closer to Qatar is timezone and thus it is a win win as they still tap the market you jizzed over as being so important as well as the European market.
That then means that the Asian market does not give Australia a huge advantage if it is still able to be tapped by the Qatar timezones.
As for the south American market, if held in Qatar it will disadvantage them, yes, but it will also be advantageous to African nations, which counters the South American point you make. Football is also huge in Africa and will be growing as a result of the World Cup being held there in 2010, I'm sure you know.
Again, as I said above, wherever it is held, it is going to disadvantage countries from another timezone.
No I'm not. I am giving you reasons as to why the decision may have been made in favour of Qatar. Simple really. I have said Australia is more suitable to hold the World Cup, but that's not to say that certain factors don't favour Qatar's bid as well. And those factors may be held in higher regard by those who make the decision.
I haven't even said corruption is out of the picture. But I am still able to lay out reasons as to why Qatar may have got it legitimately (to some extent). It's really that simple, however, you seem to want to allocate me a standpoint and then argue from there. Poor form.
It's pretty disappointing that myself and Game Breaker can't have a discussion on here without people whining and what not. There's no malice, no personal insults, none of that crap, it's just a debate.
I'm just holding out now for the 'btrain essay' joke or some variation, to be honest.
Who cares? One man's point of view won't stop black people from playing in the world cup. He knows it. Everyone knows it.That's what one of the Russian sports minsters had to say.
FMD you're being a goose. It's obvious that I don't think that Russia isn't ready for black people, hence why I said that it was not myself who said that, but a Russian official and also why I said 'apparently'.Who cares? One man's point of view won't stop black people from playing in the world cup. He knows it. Everyone knows it.
Did Hitler's viewpoint on black people stop black athletes from participating in the 1936 Berlin Olympics?
Please... :rolleyes:
LOL I'm being the goose? Umm you're the one rattling on about 1 sports minister's comment in response to me saying that Russia is capable of hosting a world cup. What a total fail of a point! As if his opinion would have any significance.FMD you're being a goose. It's obvious that I don't think that Russia isn't ready for black people, hence why I said that it was not myself who said that, but a Russian official and also why I said 'apparently'.
And for your information, there are racial problems in Russia. Like Peter Odemwingie who recently signed for West Brom and the fans of his previous club, Lokomotiv Moscow I believe, had banners saying 'Thankyou West Brom'.
I never said the lack of tolerance in some parts and areas of Russian society would prevent them from being able to host a World Cup adequately. I only mentioned that one of their own had said that their country was not ready for black people yet.
Rattling on? I mentioned it once, and you took exception to it without even recognizing that I had said it in a certain manner. I never said anything about Russia's ability to host a WC. If you don't agree with what that particular minster said, then advocate your point in his direction, not mine.LOL I'm being the goose? Umm you're the one rattling on about 1 sports minister's comment in response to me saying that Russia is capable of hosting a world cup. What a total fail of a point! As if his opinion would have any significance.
I'm well aware of Russia's racism problems. You obviously don't know much about them if Odemwingie is your case in point. There are more neo-nazis in Russia than anywhere else in the world. YouTube "From Russia With Hate" and you'll get a real idea of how bad the racism is over there.
Wrong again. I didn't take exception to anything. I was just trying to make sense of your response and what it had to do with my comment. Short answer: nothing.Rattling on? I mentioned it once, and you took exception to it without even recognizing that I had said it in a certain manner.
That's all I got from this post.tap that market
Eygpt is in Africa you dopeWhat an ugly bastard.
This isnt a good result, firstly it rewards corruption.
Secondly, it was given to a country that doesnt deserve it. Too small, too hot, never made the WC, not even ranked in top 100. If they were serious about giving it to a Middle Eastern country, then Egypt wouldve been better.
Thirdly, because an Asian country was given the rights, Australia will have to wait something like 20 years before it can think about hosting it. FIFA will give it to other continents before awarding it to Asia again.
Who the **** is saying it isnt?Eygpt is in Africa you dope