- Joined
- May 25, 2011
- Messages
- 22,588
- Reaction score
- 20,581
I’m not! Those are stats directly from NRL.com. Same deal every week with Schoupp- rubs hard but offers nothing rise in attack, abysmal defence.You are actually trolling.
I’m not! Those are stats directly from NRL.com. Same deal every week with Schoupp- rubs hard but offers nothing rise in attack, abysmal defence.You are actually trolling.
Yeah & the NRL stats are 100% accurate. lolI’m not! Those are stats directly from NRL.com. Same deal every week with Schoupp- rubs hard but offers nothing rise in attack, abysmal defence.
#committedtothetruthI never would have guessed how committed you'd be to this heel turn @utility half
No chance. Elliotts would win 44-4.... but at least the Schoupps would run hardI'd still back a team of Schoupps to beat a team of Elliotts.
They see not so skewed that anyone in their right mind could argue Schoupp is a good defender.Yeah & the NRL stats are 100% accurate. lol
Keep blaming Elliott. Look at Schoupp’s season stats. His defence has been terrible ever since he came into the team. Elliott hasn’t even been there for most of that time. Elliott had over 93 percent tackle efficiency today, Schoupp had just over 53 percent. Schoupp had twice as many missed tackles and Elliott made over 5 times as many tackles. Open your eyes.Anyone near Elliot would miss tackled ***** uselees
Schoupp a rep player.... lolllllllKids a future rep player. Our best centre prospect in years.
I think I have already done this tbh. He gas 5 missed last week and is averaging around 5 per game from memory. People don’t notice because hE rUnS hArDThat was today, but why dont you show the kennel these stats from last week's game, and the game before that, and the game before that, and the game before that, and the........?
Week in, week out you say?
Mark my words... In the meantime run off and go continue giving Ken a run down. I heard you had quite the barbie collection.Schoupp a rep player.... lolllllll
8 tackles, 6 misses, 1 ineffective, 53 percent tackle efficiency. Not even close to good enough defensively.Tough loss today but Aaron Schoupp dug in.
80 minutes
1 try
17 runs
236 metres
61 post contact metres
5 tackle breaks
2 offloads
If the Schoups ran hard, the Elliotts would miss them. But the Elliots would still high 5 and stay positive kowing they are being overpaid and still the chance to pick up a root from the Schoup's harems.No chance. Elliotts would win 44-4.... but at least the Schoupps would run hard
Err what? Schoupp may play rep footy. If the 30 odd better centres in the comp all catch covid and are offered to self isolate.Mark my words... In the meantime run off and go continue giving Ken a run down. I heard you had quite the barbie collection.
93 percent tackle efficiency vs 53. Logic dictates the Schoupps would miss more Elliotts than elliotts would miss SchouppsIf the Schoups ran hard, the Elliotts would miss them. But the Elliots would still high 5 and stay positive kowing they are being overpaid and still the chance to pick up a root from the Schoup's harems.
If he can work on his defense. He should be a good player.Tough loss today but Aaron Schoupp dug in.
80 minutes
1 try
17 runs
236 metres
61 post contact metres
5 tackle breaks
2 offloads
Err, did it occur to you that forwards make more tackles? Not to mention that Elliott plays more minutes than most forwards.and the only 2 bulldogs in the top 50 for missed tackles is elliot and waddel, elliot takes the cake having only played 17 games and racked up a nice list of misses...sorry to say but he's useless