w00t
Kennel Legend
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2008
- Messages
- 9,614
- Reaction score
- 5,610
Yeh its a big ask but could be do-able..I don't remember how many Nadal had won at 21? *Just checked he had won a few french titles but no other majors.
These two guys could be dominant forces for a little while at least.
Not sure on that hardcourt theory you could be right but as he has already won the US I think he won't be just clay dominant.
Interested to see how he goes at Wimbledon next month(and Sinner too), there was a report his right arm still wasn't 100% but will get some rest in the next couple of weeks i suppose.
Definitely Nadal at Clay and Grass. People tend to forget how good Nadal actually was at Wimbledon between 2006 - 2008. Vice versa for Fed at Clay in the same time period.
They played 3 consecutive FO and Wimbledon finals and Nadal took Fed all the way in 2 of those finals winning one of them. Absolutely no chance Alcaraz goes anywhere near that close to a prime Fed
Djokovic as good as he is, is still a shadow of his prime and still took Alcaraz to 5.