News Sydney venue moves $26m in pokies profits to NRL club as ‘community development and support’

bradtalo

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Sep 8, 2014
Messages
3,874
Reaction score
6,003

Canterbury leagues club has given millions to the Canterbury-Bankstown Bulldogs since 2014-15

One of Australia’s biggest poker machine venues has shifted more than $26m in gambling profits over eight years to its parent company – an NRL club – while claiming the payments as a community benefit for a tax cut.

In New South Wales, clubs that donate a percentage of gambling profits to community causes receive a tax concession under a scheme called ClubsGrants, which is under review by the state government after years of sustained criticism.


The scheme allows clubs to secure a tax break by using poker machine profits to pay off their operating costs or those of an associated entity. This has led to claims the scheme is a “shameless rort” that must be immediately scrapped.



Since 2014-15, the Canterbury leagues club in western Sydney – which had 634 poker machines as of 31 May – has paid $26.4m to its holding entity, the Canterbury-Bankstown Bulldogs. These payments, which are legal and within the rules, were categorised as “community development and support initiatives”.

The amount of money transferred to the NRL club was significantly larger than what was spent on non-affiliated local community groups under the scheme, according to the league club’s financial statements.


Last year, the Canterbury-Bankstown Bulldogs reported a consolidated entity profit of $10m after tax. A year earlier it was $4.5m and in 2020 it was $4.4m.ClubGrants was, according to official guidelines, “designed to ensure that larger registered clubs in NSW contribute to the provision of frontline services to their local communities; and to ensure that the disadvantaged in the community are better positioned to benefit from the substantial contributions made by those clubs”.The NSW Council for Social Service, which abandoned its 25-year association with the ClubGrants program last year after its own review identified alleged conflicts of interest, believed the scheme no longer reflects community expectations.


“The ClubGrants scheme does not reflect 21st-century standards and expectations for a taxpayer funded grants program – it is a broken model and has been from the beginning,” said the Ncoss chief executive, Joanna Quilty.

Wesley Mission’s chief executive, the Rev Stu Cameron, who is part of the NSW government’s expert panel on gambling reform, said the payments were legal but “illustrate what is fundamentally wrong with the ClubGrants scheme”.


“Rather than throwing the cashed-up Bulldogs several multimillion-dollar bones over the last few years for ‘running expenses’, these funds could have done so much to help people in the community with the cost-of-living crisis,” Cameron said.

Cameron noted the Canterbury Leagues Club had donated to many local initiatives that improved the living standards of “low income and disadvantaged people”, but said “the amounts allocated seem scandalously disproportionate to the financial support granted to a prosperous NRL club”.

The Canterbury-Bankstown Bulldogs and Canterbury leagues club were contacted for comment.

The state Greens MP Cate Faehrmann, the party’s spokesperson on gambling issues, said the scheme needed to be urgently scrapped or overhauled.

“The larger clubs like to talk up a big game when it comes to giving back to their local community, yet the vast majority of grants are going straight to their own wealthy sporting clubs,” Faehrmann said.

A spokesperson for the minister for gaming, David Harris, said ClubGrants review would “help determine whether the scheme continues to represent value for money to the people of NSW”
 

Nasheed

Banned
Gilded
Joined
Sep 23, 2016
Messages
13,327
Reaction score
8,931
Nasheed here,
Firstly the reason it’s gone from 4.5 mil to 10 mil the year after is because of Covid yo.
Secondly.
What’s wrong with doggs?
If you’re going to get all this money from pokies (aka drug dealers) and claim community benefits they need to be a lot wiser in how they spend the money than just giving it to Gus.
Yes that’s why the leagues was created but if we abuse it it’ll be taken away as ppl is pushing for by the sounds of it yayay
 

Nasheed

Banned
Gilded
Joined
Sep 23, 2016
Messages
13,327
Reaction score
8,931
Most leagues clubs do this… very legal, a non issue, the media can get fkd - why write a story that simply applies common sense and business smarts.
It is but the sharks are out and it’ll be scrapped if we aren’t socially aware with it.
 

hayes

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Mar 19, 2013
Messages
1,934
Reaction score
834
Most leagues clubs do this… very legal, a non issue, the media can get fkd - why write a story that simply applies common sense and business smarts.
Canterbury is unquestionably different as per constitution different than most leagues club
 

Dognacious

Kennel Immortal
Staff member
Administrator
Premium Member
NF Draft Champion
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
23,593
Reaction score
11,028
While its within the rules then glad we have good accountants
 

D0GMATIC

Kennel Legend
Joined
Nov 1, 2020
Messages
12,106
Reaction score
13,750
The Bulldogs are part of the Canterbury area, The league's club are allocating the money where it's patrons are, what's the issue ?
 

D0GMATIC

Kennel Legend
Joined
Nov 1, 2020
Messages
12,106
Reaction score
13,750
All the people who have made comment in the article, would all be funded,at least in part, by public money. Hardly surprising they want more of it.
 

dekepefc

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Jun 18, 2008
Messages
2,255
Reaction score
3,796
The Bulldogs are part of the Canterbury area, The league's club are allocating the money where it's patrons are, what's the issue ?
Exactly. Lefty media probably want it to support community issues such as giving millions to the .001% transgender people within the community.. rather than waste millions to help out tens of thousands of people (the supporters) in the area.
 

D0GMATIC

Kennel Legend
Joined
Nov 1, 2020
Messages
12,106
Reaction score
13,750
Exactly. Lefty media probably want it to support community issues such as giving millions to the .001% transgender people within the community.. rather than waste millions to help out tens of thousands of people (the supporters) in the area.
They'll assemble a committee,made up of all these people complaining about how the money could be spent better.It will last for years, achieve nothing and cost 26 million
 

Bad Billy

Kennel Immortal
Joined
Jan 25, 2010
Messages
16,927
Reaction score
13,142
The football club is a community interest. That’s is exactly what this program is designed for.
As for the amount going to other local programs being disproportionately low? Do these people think it costs the same to run a local netball club as it does to run an NRL club with 9 teams (including female)?
And remember, it’s not illegal funding, it’s just a tax break. If the scheme was ended, they’d still provide the funding, they’d just have to pay more tax on it.
 

Bad Billy

Kennel Immortal
Joined
Jan 25, 2010
Messages
16,927
Reaction score
13,142
"$26m ......... over eight years", that's average $3.25m per year, big deal. Hopefully a decent % of it is now spent on pathways to develop local talent, a very worthwhile local cause.


Always a Bulldog
I’m sure nearly all of it is. The NRL grant is greater than the salary cap and pays for most NRL operations.
 
Top