Surprise Surprise!!! Jayne won't accept apology

Status
Not open for further replies.

immortalbulldog

Eternal Doggy
Joined
May 20, 2008
Messages
4,846
Reaction score
688
The reporter at the centre of Canterbury's Mad Monday saga does not accept the punishment handed down to the NRL club on Tuesday, rejecting any suggestion that the vulgar comments weren't directed at her.

In a report handed down by the ARLC, it was revealed the only "punishment" dished out involves the club paying a $30,000 contribution to a nominated charity, while the Bulldogs say they will deal with those who made the offending comments involved in-house.

That means the identities of Canterbury players or staff who shouted the obscenities from Belmore Sports Ground will not be identified.

The Bulldogs remain adamant the offensive comments were directed at the players themselves, but this was rejected by the network.

Advertisement
"There was no one else there apart from two cameramen and myself.

The windows were open, these phrases were yelled out the windows," reporter Jayne Azzopardi told Nine News.

"We didn't hear anything else other than this abuse. So it was clearly directed for us to hear it.

"... Initially the abuse was directed at our cameraman but when I arrived it became more vulgar and offensive and sexual, directed at me.

"And I just don't think any woman should have to put up with that and I don't think any man should think it's okay to say those things."

In a statement issued by the ARLC, Bulldogs chief executive Todd Greenberg said he was aware of who had made every comment, but declined to disclose.

The findings, based on the Bulldogs' internal report, video evidence and an independent security report, also found that some players and their guests were found to be interacting with media representatives "in a matter that could be seen as threatening".

Greenberg, who has apologised unreservedly to Azzopardi for the situation, said there was no benefit in outing those responsible for the comments.

"We are the first to admit that we should have handled things better," Greenberg said in a statement.

"After completing a thorough investigation, I am now aware of every comment made.

"I am aware of every person that comments were attributed to and the context in which those comments were made.

"The players and staff have all been forthcoming with the information and honest in their discussions.

"... There was a lot of sledging going on between the players and they used language that was inappropriate.

"... It would not be helpful or fair to single any one name out and it can only produce a result that will be disproportionate with the actions of any individual.

"This is the result of the behaviour of a number of persons not anyone specifically."

Greenberg said he would deal with those involved individually within their contractual terms and within the club's code of conduct.

"That is good business practice and is in line with the way we manage our football club."

Interim ARLC chief executive Shane Mattiske called for the end of the term "Mad Monday", believing it could be contributing to over-the-top behaviour.

Mattiske also implored clubs to tone down post-season celebrations rather than just keeping them out of public places as the Bulldogs did.

"There is no place for `mad' behaviour at any level in our game," he said.

"Calling something `Mad Monday' is almost an excuse to go over the top and it is time for clubs across all levels of the game to seriously review how end of year celebrations are planned."

http://news.brisbanetimes.com.au/br...nday-apology-not-accepted-20121009-27b14.html
 

immortalbulldog

Eternal Doggy
Joined
May 20, 2008
Messages
4,846
Reaction score
688
Danny Weidler is scum of the earth but I swear Jayne is doing her best to I've him some company.

The thing that ****s me about Ch9s report was that the cameraman said that players were calling him a media dog and told him to **** off. I would have thought if that was true they would have aired that because it would back up their argument but the best they could air was Big Sam hiding from the camera.

Let it go channel 9
 

OTTO

Playing Pablo
Joined
Mar 9, 2007
Messages
9,304
Reaction score
24
Her cycle surely must be finished by now ??

Go away.
 

Big_Dawg

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Mar 4, 2012
Messages
1,989
Reaction score
17
Channel nine need to get over themselves and move on
 

FLICK THE EELS

Kennel Participant
Joined
Apr 10, 2007
Messages
430
Reaction score
7
Maybe Channel 9 should have sent Christine Spiteri to have covered Mad Monday. Oh that's right they sacked her because she didn't have f*ckabilty. I'm sure we'll hear about it on their news. Maybe Cameron Williams will read the story, the bloke who was sacked from Foxsports for indecently assaulting a female colleague.
 

dogkat

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
1,822
Reaction score
103
Assuming she truly believes the comments were directed at her, maybe the Club should offer her a private screening of the CCTV, and let her read their detailed report.

But only if she signs a non-disclosure agreement first.

Then afterwards, she can either say she still believes she was right, or she was wrong.
 

RookieDog

Dogs1
Joined
Oct 1, 2009
Messages
1,557
Reaction score
1,745
Assuming she truly believes the comments were directed at her, maybe the Club should offer her a private screening of the CCTV, and let her read their detailed report.

But only if she signs a non-disclosure agreement first.

Then afterwards, she can either say she still believes she was right, or she was wrong.
That is legal-speak. I like it!!
 

Rodzilla

Terry Lamb 1996
Joined
Dec 22, 2004
Messages
42,610
Reaction score
6,183
its the height of hubris to assume that sexual comments are directed at you
 

Rodzilla

Terry Lamb 1996
Joined
Dec 22, 2004
Messages
42,610
Reaction score
6,183
"... Initially the abuse was directed at our cameraman but when I arrived it became more vulgar and offensive and sexual, directed at me.


This idiot really is a piece of lying ****. 40 meters away and through a window..obviously it was directed at you, you ****ing gronk.
the thought process is: "hmm that is a sexual comment, i am a very sexy woman, ffs just look at me, as if those comments werent directed at me"
 

Dognacious

Kennel Immortal
Staff member
Administrator
Premium Member
NF Draft Champion
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
23,622
Reaction score
11,096
I wonder what would appease this woman? Maybe she thinks we should be kicked out of the NRL or fined a million dollars. $30k for a remark is steep already. She really needs to get over it. Now she is just making an idiot out of herself. An apology and a fine is more than enough imo.
 

Gingerbread Man

Kennel Participant
Joined
Jun 27, 2012
Messages
310
Reaction score
0
Q. How many journalists does it take to change a light bulb?
A. Journalists don't change light bulbs, they only change facts.
 

Bry

Kennel Legend
Joined
May 8, 2005
Messages
8,259
Reaction score
29
The name calling is not going to help the club in anyway. Relax people.
 

Pom_81

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Sep 22, 2010
Messages
3,380
Reaction score
75
Stay classy, Jayne.

Nothing loses the moral high ground faster than refusing an apology and refusing to move on. Well done.
 

Bob dog

Hectik defence
Premium Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2005
Messages
19,419
Reaction score
3,628
No proof. They must have alzheimers or did they forget.
 

FLICK THE EELS

Kennel Participant
Joined
Apr 10, 2007
Messages
430
Reaction score
7
Channel 9 is hardly making a big deal out of the fact that they gone of the quotes wrong. And that instead of being directed at Jayne Azzopardi it was clearly directed at James Graham...which does seem to undercut their whole story.
 

Snowmann

Party Rocker
Joined
Jul 14, 2012
Messages
2,492
Reaction score
2,503
the thought process is: "hmm that is a sexual comment, i am a very sexy woman, ffs just look at me, as if those comments werent directed at me"
Sure..if you're into kitchen apparatuses, maybe my standards are too low but the gronk has a face like a frying pan.
 

TheBarba

Kennel Participant
Joined
Nov 15, 2007
Messages
479
Reaction score
0
If it were your daughter would you be happy? I am not saying her behaviour is warranted, just saying....

I agree with the 15 minutes comment tho. You had your chance, you couldn't do anything.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top