Shut up, listen: the Roosters are awful (long article by Gould)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Brissy Bulldog

Proud to be a Bulldog
Joined
Feb 26, 2004
Messages
1,060
Reaction score
2
Shut up, listen: the Roosters are awful
By Phil Gould
April 23, 2006

SO GUS is the bad guy for having criticised the Roosters. Well, boo bloody hoo to you! Those in the media who staged a campaign against me during the week have no credibility.

The fact you lied, exaggerated and embellished the facts to suit your cause highlights your lack of integrity and professionalism. What's new? You've been trying this rubbish for years and achieved nothing.

You can either challenge the accuracy of what I said or you can challenge my right to say it.

The first in a no-brainer win to me. Everything I said in commentary on Channel Nine during the Roosters' performance against the Broncos last weekend was 100 per cent right. I'm sure coach Ricky Stuart would agree.

If media people question my right to criticise the Roosters, it's the height of hypocrisy. But given the individuals behind this childish campaign, hypocrisy is expected.

My involvement with the Roosters these days is negligible and has been that way for some time. I work in the media. I call it as I see it. I criticise and praise as I see fit.

With the Roosters, some people want it both ways. If I praise, I'm biased. If I criticise, I'm a villain. Get over it and get a life. You are boring people with your personal vendettas.

The Roosters have been average for more than a year. Average is unacceptable at the Roosters.

I wouldn't criticise them if I didn't think they were capable of much better. They have plenty of potential but they need to lift. Plenty of people will say you're going OK when you're not but if you want to be a success you do things the right way and not the easy way.

Senior players can complain about unfair criticism but Roosters fans would rather they did their talking on the field. The Roosters have suffered from a lack of leadership and inspiration from their senior players since Brad Fittler's retirement.

I'm not saying they're not trying. They always try. But no one has stepped up to give the team personality and character. The Roosters don't look like a team.

Their defence is not what it used to be. The worst thing about their defence is that they are doing way too much of it. Every week, the opposition gets more possession because the Roosters' ball control has been terrible.

Dropped ball, bad passes, bad play-the-balls, poor fifth-tackle options, kicking dead in goal on the full, penalised in possession, decoy runners running into ball carriers, ball players hitting runners in the head with their passes - you name it and the Roosters have done it.

Poor discipline and turnovers are eating away at their confidence and the extra workload in defence is eating away at their effectiveness in attack.

After the game against Brisbane, Shane Webcke wrote that he had never played against a Roosters team with so little direction. He's right. They lack direction and composure.

This is not a criticism of the coach. Ricky and I have talked about this. They train well but play poorly. The coach can talk endlessly about direction but it's the players who have to execute.

Direction is the responsibility of the halfback. This team has good periods in each game but they are few and far between.

Ricky is as frustrated as anyone else. He probably can't be as brutally honest as I am because he has to deal with them every day and he has some young players in the group who need encouragement.

But the Roosters won't improve until they are honest about their performances.

It's no good comparing yourself with other teams. The Roosters became great by believing they were a cut above the rest.

I will not go into selections. Ricky knows the players so that's entirely up to him and his staff. But the collective attitude of the team is more important than the individuals.

It comes down to leadership on the field. How badly you want success and what you're prepared to endure to get it. It comes down to communication, toughness, spirit, character and how much the players believe in each other.

Attention to detail and all the simple things. Respect for each other. Fighting for each other. Competing on every play, every minute for the full 80 minutes. Without these things, the rest is window dressing. It has everything to do with attitude.

The Roosters have plenty of injuries this week and will just have to weather the storm.

Maybe they won't beat the Dragons on Anzac Day. But with eight players who have played Test or Origin football (Anthony Minichiello, Chris Flannery, Braith Anasta, Brett Finch, Craig Fitzgibbon, Adrian Morley, Craig Wing and Ashley Harrison) and two (Amos Roberts and Anthony Tupou) who are destined to, they have a very competitive side.

They will miss Ryan Cross, Iosia Soliola, Shane Shackleton and Joel Monaghan but their performance will be very important, regardless of the result.

In round five in 2002, they were in a worse situation with 15 first-graders injured but they busted their backsides and it took the brilliance of Andrew Johns to beat them in the dying minutes. They set a standard for effort and desire that carried them to grand-final glory.

Not many tipsters expect the Roosters to win on Tuesday but anything can happen in football. The Roosters can win. But what they must do is inspire the injured players watching from the sidelines to be even more desperate to get on to the field and fight for the common cause.

I don't care if the Roosters hate me for saying these things, as long as they start hating someone - because that's when they play their best.
 
M

MrCharisma

Guest
Gus Gould is a moron and this is why I'm not even going to read this:p
 

Brissy Bulldog

Proud to be a Bulldog
Joined
Feb 26, 2004
Messages
1,060
Reaction score
2
Typical Gould. He says a lot without saying much.

Defends Stuart, blames the players attitude.
 

Kim Possible

Kennel Legend
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
10,693
Reaction score
14
i read the first couple of lines then saw how long it was and thought the rest will be rubbish:p
 

Bry

Kennel Legend
Joined
May 8, 2005
Messages
8,259
Reaction score
29
Blamed the halfback for not giving them direction, the rest of the article just said blah, blah, blah.
 
M

MrCharisma

Guest
BAZA said:
Blamed the halfback for not giving them direction, the rest of the article just said blah, blah, blah.
That part is true... an inconsitant halves combination
 

Brissy Bulldog

Proud to be a Bulldog
Joined
Feb 26, 2004
Messages
1,060
Reaction score
2
I thought this bit was funny:

It's no good comparing yourself with other teams. The Roosters became great by believing they were a cut above the rest.
 

ThatsNikkisTeam

Moderator
Joined
Oct 6, 2003
Messages
10,992
Reaction score
6
With the Roosters, some people want it both ways. If I praise, I'm biased. If I criticise, I'm a villain. Get over it and get a life. You are boring people with your personal vendettas.
bhahahahaha but it is true btw if fans can criticise i dont see why Gus can't even if he does sh*t me at times
 

Özil

Hava Nagila
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,737
Reaction score
109
i think he is attacking the ****ers at the daily telu****
 

QLDGirl

queensland rock
Joined
Oct 6, 2003
Messages
3,630
Reaction score
3
I didn't think it was that bad of article, he does bring up a lot of good points, although he could have done it in less words :p

The roosters don't have direction, they don't have confidence, their halves are working (give it time), and they're playing poorly. See I did it in one sentence :p
 

ThatsNikkisTeam

Moderator
Joined
Oct 6, 2003
Messages
10,992
Reaction score
6
I dont mind when Gus takes swipes at the media so ill give him that article he makes good points... i didnt think he was having a cry and chadiwrx next time the media bags dogs you have no right to windge about it (if gus has no right to take a swipe at media who attack him)
 

JayBee

Kennel Legend
Joined
Feb 23, 2005
Messages
10,791
Reaction score
4,027
Personallly i agree with what he says. How come when he criticises the Roosters he is unfair and when he says something good about him its biased? Very truei indeed.


Still hate him tho :grinning:
 

steve_mortimer

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Feb 1, 2005
Messages
1,498
Reaction score
4
One thing that Gus is good at is putting facts ont he table. He speaks his mind and often anyone who speaks what they think will cop it. I have to agree most other journo's have not been anywhere near Gus in the cred stakes.

The guy is a record holding NSW SOO coach. The first coach to really give a damn and stick by the Blues. He has won premierhsips with clubs, taken clubs off the scrap heap as he did with the Roosters and made them a force. Who else can match that? Wayne Bennett would be close but nobody of the current crop could lay claims.

The guy has a smart football brain and is a character to boot which is what gets him into trouble more often than not. He speaks the truth and the truth often hurts. :grinning:
 

Rodzilla

Terry Lamb 1996
Joined
Dec 22, 2004
Messages
42,604
Reaction score
6,175
he does speak his mind, and thats okay i guess

but he does like to sit on the fence too much

if the roosters win by 50, he'll have an article in a few weeks saying wh they are the best club and premiership threat
 

lockyer

Kennel Established
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Messages
716
Reaction score
1
steve_mortimer said:
One thing that Gus is good at is putting facts ont he table. He speaks his mind and often anyone who speaks what they think will cop it. I have to agree most other journo's have not been anywhere near Gus in the cred stakes.

The guy is a record holding NSW SOO coach. The first coach to really give a damn and stick by the Blues. He has won premierhsips with clubs, taken clubs off the scrap heap as he did with the Roosters and made them a force. Who else can match that? Wayne Bennett would be close but nobody of the current crop could lay claims.

The guy has a smart football brain and is a character to boot which is what gets him into trouble more often than not. He speaks the truth and the truth often hurts. :grinning:

agreed, and 100% agreed with his article as well... whether you like it or not, he has a brilliant tactician footy brain.
 

matt

Kennel Established
Joined
Jul 18, 2005
Messages
557
Reaction score
2
steve_mortimer said:
One thing that Gus is good at is putting facts ont he table. He speaks his mind and often anyone who speaks what they think will cop it. I have to agree most other journo's have not been anywhere near Gus in the cred stakes.

The guy is a record holding NSW SOO coach. The first coach to really give a damn and stick by the Blues. He has won premierhsips with clubs, taken clubs off the scrap heap as he did with the Roosters and made them a force. Who else can match that? Wayne Bennett would be close but nobody of the current crop could lay claims.

The guy has a smart football brain and is a character to boot which is what gets him into trouble more often than not. He speaks the truth and the truth often hurts. :grinning:
good post man, i agree with you
 

~MC~

untouchable
Joined
Mar 10, 2005
Messages
3,845
Reaction score
0
I agree with him, respect him, but I don't really like him. His voice is annoying.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top