- Joined
- May 15, 2017
- Messages
- 23,012
- Reaction score
- 42,492
You meant ‘two’, right?too many
Fair enough .
You meant ‘two’, right?too many
It was worth keeping him I agree for what he offers good depth and decent impact of the bench.300 is alot more than what he was on.
The fact he took a one year deal with manky means we could have probably offered a year deal too.
1 year deal for a great bench back rower for 250ish is great.
Even two would be more than most.You meant ‘two’, right?
Fair enough .
That’s more like it - optimism.Even two would be more than most.
Remember the Nic Cotric smile lolYou’re relying on Brent read and analysing the smile in his contract signing picture? You need to lay off the domestos mate. It’s not cordial.
*Image of Flanagun trying to be optimistic about future at Belmore under Ciraldo.That’s more like it - optimism.
Try showing some of that towards Belmore…
You counted? I don't know which of us is more dedicated lollmao @Flanagun with almost 100 posts in this thread alone.
Cooker
Have the fortitude to tag me at least.Next to nothing is not nothing. The defence rests.
When did I accuse you of trolling me? I don’t think I ever did such a thing lol
All I said was the spam replier was spamming me, so I started ignoring his comments…. not because they were triggering, simply because he was sending too many of them and they were becoming irritating and needlessly time consuming. I actually asked him to stop the spam replies and limit his responses to single replies so we could keep interacting and he ignored that request…. Presumably so he could hang his drum about holding me to account and pretend I’m hiding from him and not just cutting out an unnecessary annoyance lol
Nah no need to count just look at yr post history with a quick ctrl f lolYou counted? I don't know which of us is more dedicated lol
Just remember he's never landed a contract without the help of his dadAtta boy, looks a whole lot better than…
View attachment 89789
Why would I tag you if I have no desire to interact with you? I only mentioned you because I believed @DinkumDog was referring to something I said to you.Have the fortitude to tag me at least.
I explained the reasons for my actions, partly based upon your reaction to third parties that post longer replies.
What is apparent, is it's obvious that you don't realise that another part is me reflecting your behaviour.
Either that, or you do and don't like the shoe on the other foot!
BTW, where are all of these posts celebrating 34+ points scored against us that you mentioned?
I see no evidence supplied by you.
Common decency.Why would I tag you if I have no desire to interact with you? I only mentioned you because I believed @DinkumDog was referring to something I said to you.
Stop talking out of your butt for once in your life, fam. I don't go around tagging people with half a dozen or more comments in one sitting. I have never done that. I can comment freely on here as much as I like.... and people can ignore me as much as they like, because I'm just commenting and not constantly flooding people's notifications with unnecessary tags.
You are not a reflection of anything except your own inflated sense of self importance.
I have compromised my stance of ignoring you just this once, because I did address you indirectly, so figure I would extend that small courtesy. Believe me, this will be the last time, so you can spare me the Atticus Finch wannabe bullshit. Nobody thinks you are the hero and Kennel guardian you are trying to portray yourself as.
See ya later, alligator.
I typically do not like to ignore problems.Guys seriously, so your self a favour;
View attachment 89795
You will not regret it.
Always a Bulldog
You sure you didn’t say he was one of our few forwards who bent the line this year? Maybe I misread. If it doesn’t work out you move onBecause you said I claimed Davey was playing well (implying he was some sort of big loss due to hs stature as a player) when in reality, I was commenting on the lack of professionalism of Gus signing a player and then releasing him midway through his first year, leaving us even thinner in forward stocks than we already were. In reality, all I said was he was a decent depth player and probably in, or close to our best 17 and we now had a little less depth because of it. I'd say the same thing about Pele, too. Not because Pele was a big loss.... but because when you sign multiple players to new contracts and and up releasing them before they have even played out a full year, it doesn't reflect very well on the club's decision making.
No, I said that about Waddell.... and that is 100 per cent true.You sure you didn’t say he was one of our few forwards who bent the line this year? Maybe I misread. If it doesn’t work out you move on