RL Judiccary: 11 charged, Manly-Melbourne fined

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hansta

Im Bain's Boss!
Joined
May 25, 2007
Messages
22,608
Reaction score
1,649
http://www.nrl.com/nrl-judiccary-11...e-fined/tabid/10874/newsid/64486/default.aspx

Manly and Melbourne will each be fined $50,000 by the NRL over the fights at Brookvale Oval on Friday night with Sea Eagles’ Glenn Stewart and Storm’s Adam Blair today referred straight to the NRL judiciary while another eight players have been charged by the NRL match review committee following the brawl in Friday night’s clash at Brookvale Oval.

The immediate playing future of Stewart and Blair will now be up to three panel members to decide what punishment is handed down to them.

Eight other players face charges from the brawl ranging from contrary conduct to striking; Sisa Waqa, Bryan Norrie, Jaiman Lowe, Sika Manu, Darcy Lussick, Brett Stewart, Kieran Foran and Michael Robertson.

The breach notices outlining the fines will make no judgment on the actions of any of the 10 individual players who are the subject of judiciary charges (see notes below).

The fines are on the basis of the overall conduct of the teams and the damage their actions caused to the image and welfare of the game. Clubs will have five business days to respond to the breach notices.

“We need to remind everyone that the episode we saw on Friday night is wrong both for the behaviour in itself and for the image of the game,” NRL Chief Executive, Mr David Gallop, said today.

“There are many fans, families and commercial partners who will simply walk away unless we send a clear message that what occurred will not be tolerated.

“There is a collective responsibility here that both clubs must share.

“Both clubs need to accept that what happened on Friday night is damaging to Rugby League and is disrespectful to those who play and follow the game.

“This isn’t a time for anyone to be looking for excuses or deflecting blame to others … both clubs need to face up to their responsibility for the overall behaviour of their players.

“The sight of so many players from both teams fighting, of people running in and leaving the bench area, was an horrendous look for the game.

“In a weekend when we should have been celebrating the heroic efforts of teams trying to secure places in the finals, the game has instead been sidetracked by a return to headlines that we all believed were part of the distant past.

“It bears remembering that our sponsors allocate their money carefully and for the sole purpose of enhancing their own brand.

“We must protect that because no sponsor who takes their association with the game seriously wants to be associated with such ugly scenes.

“Indeed it could be fairly said that our existing sponsors and those of our other clubs missed out on exposure this weekend because of the attention given to this episode.

“The game today is cleaner than it has been at any time in its history, with a judicial system that has been copied by our competitor codes, and we will preserve that position at all costs.”

In addition to the Match Review Committee, today a full operational review also took place into the extent of any breaches of the NRL’s Operational Procedures.

While there were breaches of the guidelines relating to sideline and bench procedures (the NRL has deemed that the overall fine on the clubs is sufficient to cover those breaches), the conduct of officials and trainers from both clubs did not warrant any action.

“In reviewing Friday night it has to be said that there were parties from both clubs who attempted to intervene in a positive manner and there were those who behaved with restraint,” Mr Gallop said.

“I commend them. Unfortunately there was so much that was clearly wrong on both sides that it is not appropriate to differentiate the teams to any degree.

“As a result of Friday night, referees will be instructed that, where multiple players are being sent off or sin binned, that each player will not be dismissed until the previous player has actually crossed the sideline.

“At that point it will be the club’s responsibility to escort each player immediately to their dressing-room.

“As much as we are keen to take any lessons that can be taken I stress that anyone who blames the referee for what happened on Friday night is wrong and that they are looking to escape the real issue at hand.”

The NRL Match Review Committee has issued eleven charges from Friday night’s game, while Canberra Raiders centre Joel Thompson was also charged with a grade 1 careless high tackle in his side's game against Penrith.

Judiciary report

Adam Blair Contrary conduct – fighting (referred)

Glenn Stewart Contrary conduct – fighting (referred)

Adam Blair Striking – grade 2

Sisa Waqa Detrimental conduct – grade 2

Bryan Norrie Detrimental conduct – grade 1

Jaiman Lowe Detrimental conduct – grade 1

Sika Manu Detrimental conduct – grade 1

Darcy Lussick Contrary conduct – grade 4

Brett Stewart Contrary conduct – grade 3

Keiran Foran Contrary conduct – grade 2

Michael Robertson Contrary conduct – grade 1

Joel Thompson Careless high tackle – grade 1
 

mareeta

Kennel Participant
Joined
Sep 2, 2006
Messages
422
Reaction score
1
Could someone please explain the grading system I'm a little confused how some got grade 1 or 2 so on
 
P

Paint.

Guest
The worse it is, the higher. Grade 1 is the lowest.

Each charge gives diff points, every 100 pts results in a weeks suspension, so 325 points is 3 weeks and 25 pts carry over
 

rogueflare

popeye
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
1,123
Reaction score
123
So 3 things...
1. Why is Adam Blair charged twice and Glenn Steward not?
2. Why did that little rat, Gidley, escape - not only any kind of punishment during the game - but being put on report to the judiciary?
3. Why did Dave Taylor get away with his forearm to the face of the broncos player, when Pritchard got a grade 3 for a shoulder to the face?

What a pathetic system we have.
 

~stacie

Michael Ennis ♥
Joined
May 19, 2008
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Glenn Stewart is scum! He was sin-binned a good 15-30 seconds or so before Adam Blair. He stuck around & waited for Blair & then mouthed off. Plus he threw the first punch. If anything Stewart should have been charged twice. Not Blair. fml
 
P

Paint.

Guest
Assuming they all take the early guilty plea, and have no carry over pts, then:

Adam Blair - 2 weeks + 25 carry over pts + Judiciary for Stewart fight
G Stewart - Judiciary for fight with Blair
Waqa - 2 weeks + 25 carry over
Lowe - 1 week + 25 carry over
Manu - 1 week + 25 carry over
Lussick - 4 weeks + 25 carry over
B Stewart - 3 weeks + 25 carry over
Foran - 2 weeks + 25 carry over
Robertson - 1 week + 25 carry over

Thompson - 75 carry over pts, 0 weeks
 

Shanked

U been Shanked
Joined
May 22, 2008
Messages
11,575
Reaction score
2,628
Glenn Stewart is scum! He was sin-binned a good 15-30 seconds or so before Adam Blair. He stuck around & waited for Blair & then mouthed off. Plus he threw the first punch. If anything Stewart should have been charged twice. Not Blair. fml
blair jogged and stopped at stewart both were as bad as each other. i think the striking charge was for the upper cut
 

Hansta

Im Bain's Boss!
Joined
May 25, 2007
Messages
22,608
Reaction score
1,649
$10 Blair told Glen that Brett should have went to jail for being a pedo :p
 

Kaz

Kennel Immortal
Joined
Sep 25, 2006
Messages
19,145
Reaction score
12,071
If B Stewart pleads guilty, it will be 1 week.
 

OITENTA-E-NOVE

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Dec 23, 2008
Messages
4,635
Reaction score
271
Glenn Stewart is scum! He was sin-binned a good 15-30 seconds or so before Adam Blair. He stuck around & waited for Blair & then mouthed off. Plus he threw the first punch. If anything Stewart should have been charged twice. Not Blair. fml
G. Stewart was sin binned for being 3rd man - in the 1st altercation he only pushed players. Blair gave lussick a uppercut which was what lead to his 1st striking charge.
 

dogkat

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
1,822
Reaction score
103
Rebecca Wilson on Channel 7 news stated that it was Manly's fault.

But she said that they have been stewing since the Brett Stewart incident, and it came to a head in that brawl in that game.

For some dumbass illogical reason, it was all based around something that occurred 2 years ago.
 

Kaz

Kennel Immortal
Joined
Sep 25, 2006
Messages
19,145
Reaction score
12,071
Manly will never move on from the Stewart story.

Brett Stewart thinks the NRL were harsh.

He & Manly think the NRL gave 4 weeks for the rape story, but it was because he was p!ssed at Manly's offical launch.
 
P

Paint.

Guest
Stewart 1 week; Foran 1 week; Robertson 0 weeks; Lussick 2 weeks

WTF?
 

Mr Invisible

Banned
Joined
Apr 26, 2008
Messages
0
Reaction score
47
Stewart 1 week; Foran 1 week; Robertson 0 weeks; Lussick 2 weeks

WTF?
???

Your initial comments were correct regarding the penalties. Judiciary sit on Weds night so nobody will know the rulings / punishments they will serve until then.

Serves these clowns right... How Choc didn't get involved is mindblowing .. I thought he loved a good punch on?

Ahh well whoever plays Manly's NSW Cup side this week (who aren't that great anyway) should easily get a win.
 

Bakes

The REAL Bakes
Joined
Apr 5, 2004
Messages
13,982
Reaction score
486
As expected, nothing charges for most
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top