Fair enough but Mick is as much a part of this revival as anyone and deserves the kudos. Plenty of players give their coach a rap as well after a win and still keep it professional.
I think they're all still mindful of throwing Baz under the bus. It's obvious the media want that, but they love Baz and don't want to see him disgraced. Even Potter knows and likes him. What people seem to not understand or not care about, is that while from the outside, we can clearly see Baz wasn't a good coach, the players could quite believably think the opposite. He may come across as a good coach on the paddock etc, and he obviously has a great relationship with the players, but he didn't get results and that's what matters at the end of the day.
I'm sure there's been a lot more to their revival than just combos gelling etc. although I have been saying that was always going to be a factor. As Jacko said, 10 new players or thereabouts started the season. It's like a brand new team, but Potter would have definitely taught them a few things. Yet, they don't need to be telling the media specific details. As is often the case Mick has given fairly cliché answers, which is fine for me. I don't even watch press much. Only have been lately because Mick is new in the role and I like his style. What he or the players say isn't very important to me. It's performances like the last fortnight which tell me all I need to know.