Pearce did knock it on......BUT

[bulldogfan1]

Have a look at the replay, Pearce clearly did knock it on, however, when scrambling for ball when it was on the ground, he was held back. A dogs player grabbed him and held him back.

If anything it should have been a penalty to the Knights.

Shame as it was a decent come back.

 

[CaptainJackson]

He held tolman back you nutcase

 

[BondiBulldog]

We never looked liked winning to be honest..

 

[coach]

Have a look at the replay, Pearce clearly did knock it on, however, when scrambling for ball when it was on the ground, he was held back. A dogs player grabbed him and held him back.

If anything it should have been a penalty to the Knights.

Shame as it was a decent come back.

You better look at replay again muppet

 

[Boxer]

Knock on should be the call,
Pearce got there first and knocked on.

 

[DoggyStyla]

If we had a better first half we would have won but let’s face it we suck!

 

[vegny]

Have a look at the replay, Pearce clearly did knock it on, however, when scrambling for ball when it was on the ground, he was held back. A dogs player grabbed him and held him back.

If anything it should have been a penalty to the Knights.

Shame as it was a decent come back.

Which happened first, the knock on or the holding back?

 

[Scoooby]

KNOCK ON !!!!!!! Fuck sake, was there for all too see.

 

[bulldogfan1]

Which happened first, the knock on or the holding back?

Holding back

Dot believe me? Look at the replay. Tolman had his hands on him and held him back.

 

[KLil]

Da fcuk? Pearce knocked it on before anyone was even close... Have u been drinking??

 

[vegny]

Holding back

Dot believe me? Look at the replay. Tolman had his hands on him and held him back.

I must have missed that. Then should be a penalty and not play on

 

[CBDoggies]

Dog fucker did knock it on but..... he did knock it on....

 

[Bull Terrier]

Knock on knock on knock on thats it

 

[bulldogfan1]

Have a look again.

Dogs player grabs Pearces shorts.

Dont believe me? Click on the link below.

https://www.sportingnews.com/au/lea...ding-newcastle-try/1xckccpvmmhiy112z90ntv7pom

 

[GA45]

Have a look at the replay, Pearce clearly did knock it on, however, when scrambling for ball when it was on the ground, he was held back. A dogs player grabbed him and held him back.

If anything it should have been a penalty to the Knights.

Shame as it was a decent come back.

Get your knights gear on you tosser

 

[Bull Terrier]

Have a look again.

Dogs player grabs Pearces shorts.

Dont believe me? Click on the link below.

https://www.sportingnews.com/au/lea...ding-newcastle-try/1xckccpvmmhiy112z90ntv7pom

Couldnt care if he grabbed his dick. Lot of back play stuff goes on that was a dead set knock on

 

[Mr Invisible]

National Rugby League Book of Imaginary Rules
Section 3 - Shithouse Calls.
Paragraph 7 - "Knock ons"
Subsection 2

"If a player, playing against the Bulldogs, looses possession of the ball and it travels forward, it will be deemed play on, unless the Bulldogs knock the ball forward".
"If a Bulldogs player drops the ball at any time, regardless of the direction it travels, it will be deemed a knock on".

 

[Doglover]

Dogs dropped too much ball BUT the knock on call today and incorrect goal kick position against storm demonstrate we aren’t getting even 50% of the calls. There will be little fuss made or refs held accountable as we are last. All hell would break loose if it was the roosters.

 

[stinkypinky]

Even if Tolman held Pearce back they still should of called a knock on and then penalty to knights you can play a advantage from a knock on

 

[KLil]

How about Watsons obvious miraculous knock/grab in the first half... How about Watsons one on one rake on okunbor that hit the deck too... How about the constant offsides ALLLLL GAMEEE. Not oe 50/50 went our way... Losing is one thing but atleast CAN WE LOSE ON OUR OWN FUKN TERMS!!!


By the way Pay is wrapped with these calls... It diverts attention from his shit coaching.